The deductive model
Theoretical framework and generation of hypothesis
Scientific Research Design
Methods of empirical analysis
Construct measurement of independent variables
Presentation of results
Discussion of results
The prosperity and wealth of nations are closely linked with economic growth. Accelerating the development of economic growth in a sustained way is therefore one of the most important issues in economics. Economists have long used a variety of approaches to shed light on why some countries experience faster growth than others. In the vast amount of literature on the subject there are three schools that stand out in particular. First, there is a group of scholars that places geographical factors such as climate, transport cost and natural resources as the main explanatory factors. Recent writings by Jared Diamond and Jeffery Sachs are important contributions in this paradigm (Diamond, 1997; Sachs, 2001). Second, there is a faction that emphasizes international trade as a key to economic growth. Important contributions to this market-integration view have been presented in the works of Frankel & Romer (1999) and Dollar & Kraay (2004). Finally, there is a third group focusing on the explanatory power that institutions veil in this matter. This paper will follow in this tradition, as there seems to bee an increasingly pervasive concurrence among economists studying the phenomena that the development and quality of the institutional environment holds the key to prevailing patterns of sustained growth and prosperity around the world. Rich countries are those with sustained rule of law and property rights, effective policies towards private enterprises and competition, the political system is stabile and effective, companies enjoys easy access to financing and superior tax regimes and there is a well functioning infrastructural system. Poor countries are those where the arrangements are nonexistent or ill formed.
This approach suggests a somewhat casual relationship between institutional development and economic growth. This implies that a poor country, which is able to revise the rules of the game in the direction of better institutional environment, is likely to experience a lasting economic growth. The causality of this relationship has however been questioned (Rodrik, 2004; Hausman et al, 2005b). In this article we want to investigate the relationship between institutional development and economic growth further in order to enhance the understanding of the relationship. Is this really the end of all policy development and a manifestation of an “institutions rule” approach to economic development?
Long run trends in the global economy suggest that emerging markets are the new drivers for global economic growth. Emerging markets can be defined as countries with lower level of development than EU, North America and Japan and high growth in recent years (Mygind, 2007). This makes emerging markets countries useable as laboratories for trend research related to economic growth. Brazil, as a part of the BRIC countries, has for a long time been defined as an emerging market country. In spite of quite impressive reforms (Hausmann et al, 2005b) the country has failed to show similar growth rates as China and India (DB, 2008). In this paper we therefore want to investigate how the economic growth in Brazil is related to the development in the institutional environment. Could the development and quality of the institutional environment in Brazil hold the key to understanding how to increase growth in the country? These notions has led to our research question, which is:
How does the institutional environment affect the economic growth in Brazil?
The deductive model
In order to answer our research question we will apply the traditional deductive method of...
Bibliography: (Acemoglu et al, 2001) Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. (2001). "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation," American Economic Review 91,1369-1401.
(Bosworth and Collins 2003) Bosworth, B and Collins, s (2003) The Empirics of Growth: An Update
(Comte, 1852) Comte, August
(DB, 2008) Deutsche Bank Research (2006): Brazil: O pais do futuro? – Economic scenarios for the next 15 years pp 1-9,
(Diamond, 1997) Diamond, J
(Dollar and Kraay, 2004) Dollar, D. and Kraay, A., (2004) Trade, Growth, and Poverty The Economic Journal 114, 22-49.
Dunning 2005) Dunning J. (2005) Institutional reform, foreign direct investment, and European transition economies in R Grosse (ed.) International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century. 49-78.
(Durkheim, 1893) Durkheim, È. (1893) “The Division of Labour in Society” The Free Press reprint 1997,
(Ferreira et al, 2006) Ferreira H.G., Leite G
(Fligstein 1996) Fligstein, N. (1996) “Markets as Politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61 (4): 656-673
(Frankel & Romer, 1999) Frankel, J., and D
(Goldman Sachs, 2007) BRICs and beyond: The 'B ' in BRICs: Unlocking Brazil 's Growth Potential
(Hausman et al 2005a) Hausman, R., Rodrik, D
(Hausman et al, 2005b) Hausmann, Ricardo, Lant Pritchett, and Dani Rodrik. (2005) Growth Accelerations Harvard University.
(Huges et al. 2002) Hughes, M./Kroehler, C.J./Zanden, J.W.V,: (2002), Theoretical Perspectives, Sociologi: The Core, 6th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill. 18-21
(Jensen and Meckling 1976) Jensen, Michael C., Meckling, William H
(Mygind, 2008) International Business in Emerging Markets – IB42 spring 2008 Brazil, Russia, India, China – BRIC – risks and opportunities Lecture at CBS 28/02/08.
(Narula & Dunning, 2000) Narula, R. and Dunning, J. H. (2000), Industrial Development, Globalisation and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries, Oxford Development Studies, 28 (2): 141-167.
(North 1990) North D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance Cambridge University Press
(North 1991) North D
(Perry et al 2005) Perry, G., Arias O., López H., Maloney, W., Servén, L.(2005): Poverty Reduction and Growth: Virtuous and Vicious Circles
(Powell and DiMaggio 1991) Powell, W
(Rodrik, 2004) Rodrik, D. (2004) Getting Institutions Right
(Rodrik et al
(Sachs, 2001) Sachs, J. D. (2001). Tropical Underdevelopment National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8119.
(Scott 1995) Scott R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations Foundations for Organizational Science
(Sekaran, 1992) Sekaran, Uma “Research methods for business: A skill building approach” John Wiley & Sons, Inc
(Stigler 1961) Stigler G. J (1961)The economics of information
(Stiglitz & Charlton, 2005) Stiglitz, J.E
(Williamson 1975) Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press, 1975
(Helpman, 2004) Helpman, Elhanan (2004), The Mystery of Economic Growth
Please join StudyMode to read the full document