Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Insanity Defense

Good Essays
528 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Insanity Defense
Insanity Defense Due to a malfunction of certain areas within a mentally deficient individual’s brain the Insanity Defense issue should be slightly altered. Reason being is simply because since they are mentally unstable they could possibly not be so cognitive to their actions. However given the fact they are human to a certain degree they have a understanding of the actions being committed. There is not an excuse for murder. There is no excuse for mangling limbs. There is no excuse for death of another person. Yet there is an excuse for Insanity Defense. The first factor to be considered is how bad the defendant’s mental disability is in correlation to the committed offense. If there was a chart to measure the severity of the brain then it would be a more reasonable jury ruling. Without a way to detect how damaged ones brain is could mean the difference between an electric chair and a simple probation issuing. There is no way that a defendant should be let off in any circumstance. Murder is murder damaged brain or healthy brain. Another topic of discussion is should the victim pleading insanity just be sentenced to a psychiatric facility or should the punishment be altered slightly. Simply because one pleads “not guilty by reason of insanity” (NGRI) does not justify the action committed. An insane individual still must endure much more than just a temporary rehabilitation. Though the insane suspect could really have a mental malfunction that does not delete the life(s) he/she has taken within the course of not compensating for future consequences. To top that concrete facts should be able to support when and why the defendant started to realize that they were at a breaking point. Such things as different appetite desires, change in sleeping pattern, unusual psychotic inhibitions so on and so forth. A respectable amount of time should be dedicated in order to truly understand the thinking pattern of an insane human. In most cases states that do allow the “Insanity Defense” use The M’Naughten Rule most commonly which addresses that the defendant in question is guilty but had no understanding of the acts being committed. Psychiatrists also play a huge part in assessing the damage of an individual’s mental incapability. By a psychologist analyzing the patient they can determine if the behavior of the crime and the insanity defense plea matches up. Just because the insane suspect states that they have a mental illness does not totally justify the means of the action committed. Without proper detection of the mentally accused then anyone could possibly say that they are insane. Criminals would have a field day addressing to the courts that they have a unstable thinking pattern and they would be released with a milder sentence for one that they truly deserve. In conclusion the insanity defense plea should remain but be altered. One too many people can plea insanity but what justifies the true insane mind of a person. Although the judge has final ruling of the defendant statistics should ran on the person in trial perhaps before the case to see how insane one actually is.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Severely mentally ill individuals may commit horrific crimes. Many believe that these crimes deserve the death penalty; however, others believe that in certain circumstances the mentally ill should be exempt from capital punishment and believe that the punishment is too extreme for those who are not fully aware of committing their crimes. Many mentally ill individuals have been executed and some are currently on death row. All the while, this controversial issue is still being debated on.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the state of Virginia, there are several requirements that set the standard for NGRI. The defendant must be assessed utilizing tests for insanity such as M’Naghten and the American Law Institute Test for Insanity. In this state’s jurisdiction, the defendant must be evaluated and declared insane at the time of offense because of mental defects or problems. In addition, these mental defects should be the reason why the defendant did not understand the nature, character, and consequence of the act (dbhds.virginia.gov). The defects of the mental state was reason to the inability to distinguish right from wrong, and created impulse to commit the act. In the jurisdiction of the state of Virginia, mental retardation and psychotic disorder will qualify as a reason to use the insanity defense or major aspects that lead to NGRI. Moreover, the use of insanity defense can lead to a GMBI (guilty but mentally ill) verdict. This conviction recognizes the defendant’s mental illness but still holding him or her responsible for the crime committed. In Virginia, GMBI verdict is reached when there is evidence to support “either a lack of the defendant’s appreciation for the wrongness of their actions, or a lack of understanding of the consequences of their actions”…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Serial Killer Research

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A formal definition of legal insanity first was adopted in 1843 and is called the M 'Naghten test; its basic form still is used today. The test outlines that the defense must clearly prove that the accused person was so impaired psychologically as to not understand that the crime was wrong when he or she committed it. Most crime experts believe that serial killers are not insane and are fully aware of their actions at the time that they commit murders. What 's more, serial murderers commit several crimes, so it would follow that they should be proved as insane when planning and committing all the crimes they 're charged with. Some serial killers have been diagnosed as psychopaths, or people who act with total disregard for the rights of others; they can tell the difference between right and wrong, however, so psychopaths aren 't considered insane.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the beginning of Anglo-American law, the proposition that some criminal defendants should not be found guilty of their crimes by reason of mental instability has been a well established judicial action throughout centuries of jurisdiction. Even though the original intent of this practice was to soften the harsh consequences of capital punishments, the psychiatric state of persons convicted of crimes quickly became an important mechanism of social regulation. The justification for this mechanism lies in the assumption that the criminally insane are irrational and therefore non-responsible of their crimes. As we examine the history and implications of the insanity plea, a few questions should be kept in mind---1. How can we be sure that a person is indeed insane (he could be putting on a show) and 2. Should a mentally ill person be punished at all.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One legal standard used to determine whether or not a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” as per the M 'Naghten Rule is that because of their mental illness they either did not know what they were doing was wrong or knew it was wrong but could not control their actions (“enotes.com”)…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Not Guilty, By reason of Insanity!" These words have stung the ears of many courtroom observers, especially the families and friends of victims whose lives were snuffed out by a so-called 'insane' assailant. While there are indeed many insane people running around the streets today, I feel that many persons who use the temporary insanity defense are more conniving than insane. Also, being an inexact science, the psychiatric community often offers up differing opinions as to any particular individual's sanity. Furthermore, money or lack thereof can play a major role in the success or failure of an insanity defense. The temporary insanity defense should therefore be abolished, especially for felony offenses such as murder.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Although some criminals abuse the insanity plea by invoking it to escape being punished for their crimes, the insanity plea should nevertheless still be allowed for those with a documented record of mental illness.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense Essay

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is a topic that seems to garner a lot of public attention even though it is rarely used and is rarely successful. So why is this topic so popular considering its rarity? The answer could be a combination of highly publicized cases that use the insanity defense and the public’s misunderstanding of exactly what happens when someone is found not guilty by reason of insanity. The public has a common misconception that someone found not guilty by reason of insanity it just let go and not punished for his or her crimes, but in reality a person is almost always committed and often longer time than if the defendant had gone to prison…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People assume that everyone who commits a crime and pleas insanity is using it as a way to get out of the crime they committed, especially murder. What most do not know is how hard it is to actually be convicted of Insanity. When someone is convicted of insanity, that also does not mean they are off the hook. Most if not all face a longer sentence then if they did not get convicted of insanity. What exactly does insanity mean? “Insanity is the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and or will to control actions.” (Samaha,2015, pg209) There are two cases that I am going to talk about that both plead insanity but both had different results. The case of Andrea Yates and Eddie Ray Routh, two very big cases that happened years apart from each other in Texas…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When an individual commits a diminishing crime with little to no motivation, there are psychiatrists appointed to the suspect’s case to review their mentality throughout their lifetime in order to detect any instability in their emotions that could have effected their mentality during the crime. In the Andrea Yates case, through careful research, it showed that she had experienced severe depression during the pregnancies of her fourth child. There she was treated and regained her stability, although, after experiencing the same symptoms when her last child was born, she was deemed mentally ill. In this case, she was considered mentally ill and sentenced to a psych ward, even with several faults in her story. One’s mentality is a sensitive case and it is determined by perspective on what exactly someone considers ill so there is no exact proof to someone being insane other than their given symptoms. That brings us back to the argument on whether one should be able to plead insanity. In my opinion, I believe that it should be an option with…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays