Preview

Influences on Judicial Power

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1474 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Influences on Judicial Power
Influences on Judicial Power

Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review. Chief Justice John Marshall, in his ruling of Marbury v. Madison, established the principle of judicial review advocated by Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. Originally designated as the weakest of the three branches in government by the framers of the Constitution, the Judiciary has accumulated an increase in political influence through judiciary review and has proven to be an essential institution in the separation of powers as well as an active participant in the system of checks and balances. According to Hamilton in Federalist 78, the judicial branch has the least amount of power among the three branches of government. The Judiciary is "the weakest of the three departments of power, that it can never attack with success either of the other two" (Woll, 410). The enumerated powers of Congress include the authority to collect taxes, borrow money, regulate commerce, and pass federal law. These assigned powers permit Congress to control the economy and regulate the public by adopting legislations. The Executive branch has the power to enforce laws, negotiate treaties, and accept ambassadors. Possessing these powers along with being the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, the President is capable of leading the federal government through perils pertaining to the public. The Judiciary "has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever…It may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Chief Justice Marshall first established the important principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, his goal was to give the judicial branch a safeguard by expanding the Court’s power and legitimizing the weakest branch of government. As Hamilton pointed out in Federalist 78, the judicial branch “will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution” because it “has no influence over the either the sword or the purse, no direction of either the strength or the wealth of society, and can take no action whatsoever.” He says the Court does not have “FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment, and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm for the efficacy of its judgments” (Fed. 78). The Court has the authority to say whether a law is constitutional, and Marshall gives himself that final authority without addressing enforcement, because the power to enforce belongs to the executive. The Court simply writes the opinion.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the above statement. The US Supreme Court started slowly as a branch of our government, but by 1857 it emerged as the most powerful branch. The Presidency and the Executive branch certainly can create things, implement new ideas and have a large impact on all the citizens' lives. The Congress as the legislative branch can establish or change laws, and declare war. These are both powerful branches. However, the Supreme Court places the great checks and balances on both the Executive and Legislative branches. The Supreme Court has the final say as to the appropriateness of the law, and the actions of the President. They imposed during this time period limits of power on the other branches.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and Balances

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution separates the power of government into three branches: the legislative power is vested in the Congress, the executive power rests with the President and his bureaucracy and the judicial power is granted to the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Whereas each branch of government has separate and particular powers as listed in the Constitution, each branch is also given the power, duty and ability to control and balance the other(s) in a system of checks and balances.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    None of the three branches can make laws or do something without the approval of the other two, this system is called the system of checks and Balances. Congress can pass the law but president can veto the law if he thinks it is unconstitutional, congress can override the president’s veto by getting two-thirds of majority. But even with the approval of the president and congress, still the Supreme Court can come in and say that the law is unconstitutional. The president is considered powerful because he is the head of the whole Executive branch alone.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency. To avoid tyranny, the delegates divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch. Each branch has the authority to restrain the other branch to provide checks and balance of the Constitutional system. The president can reject laws passed by Congress. Congress can override the decision after it has been reviewed by both Houses. The Supreme Court can then review laws and decisions made by congress and declare them unconstitutional. While the executive and legislative branches are elected by the people, judges under the Judicial Branch are appointed by the president and approved by the Senate. Article III of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Executive branch is composed of the President, the Vice President, and the departments, which is responsible for making sure that the laws set in place are properly carried out. The Judicial branch, which is accountable for establishing justice and comprehending the law, contains the Supreme Court and the federal courts. The final branch is the Legislative branch, which includes the House and the Senate, has the ability to approve, create, or veto laws. Each branch holds certain rights over the other in order to keep it in check and not allow one division to be superior over the other, so when it comes to the judicial branch, the legislative and executive branch hold some authority over the judicial. There is no complete control given to any branch. For example, the legislative branch (the senate), and the executive branch (the president), appoint and suggest those who may be a part of the judicial branch (the Supreme Court justices), but the judicial branch is also given the power to judge the actions of the president and the…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Constitution, the Legislative Branch has the most power in our government because they have the most checks and balances over the other branches. The Constitution gives the Legislative many powers to overrule and control the decisions of the other two branches:”The President appoints the heads of all the departments, appoints ambassadors, appoints Federal judges and appoints Supreme Court Justices. The Senate must confirm all nominations.”(Article II, Section 2) and “The President, Vice President, and other Executive leaders can be impeached by Congress for committing crimes.”(Article II, Section 4). The Constitution gives Congress the power to approve or decline all of the President's appointments. This gives not only gives…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch of the United States is network of courts that interprets and applies laws. Though they generally do not create laws, they decipher them and apply them to a certain case. One of the powers of the judiciary is the power to declare laws unconstitutional. Under the system of Checks and Balances, this main check that the judiciary has on both the legislative and executive branch is the power of judicial review. This power allows the Supreme Court to examine and compare acts undertaken by Congress (legislative branch) and the executive branch and invalidate them in both federal and state governments. Essentially, this means that the Court can overturn any move by state law or Congress if the Court is under the belief that an…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The constitution as a written document is very simple and vague, making it fundamentally political and thus requiring those who interpret it to take into account the present state of the country and the effects that their decision will have on the current populous. The founding fathers, like our politicians today, had conflicting ideas on how the country should be run, hence the length and vagueness of the document. Among these debates was the issue of the judiciary branch. Many believed that a branch whose members were not publicly elected, and thus not representing the will of the people, garnered more authority and power than the others. In response to such criticism, Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalist 78, in which he said the courts as outlined by the constitution are the weakest branch of government because, "It [Judiciary Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."(1) Hamilton, along with many others, believes that the constitution implies that the courts have the power to judge issues brought to the Supreme Court. The courts ability to rule on the constitutionality of issues is not specifically mentioned the constitution but was reaffirmed in the landmark Supreme Court decision, Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. In declaring that the courts have the ability to determine a laws constitutionality, chief justice John Marshall established a policy of judicial review. Marshall's decision gave the courts inherent powers the constitution didn't specifically mention but also created a new dilemma for the courts: how to go about interpreting laws.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The form of government currently in place in the United States, implements separation of powers and Federalism. The separation of powers creates three branches of government, the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. With each branch having different powers to keep each branch in check and from having too much power. Among the most powerful figures are the president and congress, with each having certain privileges in foreign and domestic matters. The president of the United States possesses a range of powers and privileges under the constitution. They include such abilities as being able to pardon anyone convicted of a federal crime, the power to issue executive orders that govern executive branch operations, the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays