Preview

Inequalities Leading To The French Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inequalities Leading To The French Revolution
Some of the major inequalities which existed in France in the 1700s were that the people were divided into three large groups, everything depends how is your economic status. They were two two estates had privileges for example access to high offices and exemption of taxes, those privileges weren't granted to the third. The Roman Catholic Church was the first estate which help poor people with education and relief services. The second estate were the rich nobles they own a 20 percent of land and paid almost no taxes. The third estate was the lowest and was three groups divided, first group were the bourgeoisie (middle class) that were the professionals workers, the second group was the worker of France the ones the do the domestic work and then the third was the peasants. In conclusion France in the 1700s had a lot of inequalities because that rich people didn't pay taxes at all, and then the poor used to pay a lot of taxes it wasn't fair the peasants and the poor people pay what rich people do. Besides it wasn't fair that not all the people have the privilege to study and learn.

2 How did Louis XVI weak leadership lead to the French Revolution?
…show more content…
He didn't pay to much attention to the government advisers and he didn't look at details of governing he didn't have patience to do it. He have a wife the queen which only give him more problem, she was always giving him poor advice. The queen used to spend a lot of money in clothes and then Louis was with no money left all the problems of the government and more his wife spending a lot of money. In conclusion Louis XVI didn't have what is needed to control France, he left France without money and push the french

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He lost four wages, on four wars. Because of that, France went into bankruptcy. France was at war for 30 years under the rule of Louis XIV. Louis XIV toughest war was the Spanish succession. His grandson inherited Spain, along with all of its possessions. He wanted to unite with him, which would give him other countries, islands and colonies to own. One of the main reasons why Louis XIV lost the wars he did was because of the balance of power. He was much more powerful than the countries he was about to go to war with, smartly, the European countries allied up with each other; balancing out the power between them and France. With the European powers allying to prevent Louis from uniting Spain and France together, they overpowered France. Louis agreed to the Peace of Utrecht; Spain and France crowns could never unite, giving the allied Europeans what they wanted. If Louis had won, he would have control of Spain’s Territories; of other small countries and American colonies. Putting in a great amount of money and losing the wars was not something Louis had intended, because of this, France was greatly in…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV strove vigorously for supremacy in foreign affairs. He was to use his foreign policy to establish a universal monarchy for himself or alternatively to use it to secure natural frontiers for France thus improving its defenses. He worked successfully to create an absolutist and centralized state. During his reign Louis was involved in four major wars, some of which Louis may be accountable as the provocateur; however, I believe that mainly his motives were purely defensive. The war of Devolution served as a pretext which nettled him part of Flanders, although the Dutch then moved against him with the Triple Alliance. Louis was determined to crush Holland and this began the third of the Dutch wars, which depleted his treasury. Louis proved an incredibly extravagant spender, dispensing huge sums of money to finance the royal court. The following ten years the king limited his policies to diplomacy. Louis continued the nobility's exemption from taxes but forced its member into financial dependence to the crown and the provincial nobles also lost political power. Louis does have a genuine concern for his country and despite his dubious methods he does manage to secure the territories that he wishes to secure. He curtailed local authorities and created specialized ministries. Louis's grandson retained the Spanish throne but the war of Spanish Succession left France in great debt and a weakened military. Louis used the bourgeoisie to build his centralized bureaucracy. He illustrated new administrative methods to make him more in control. Louis's general Colbert worked to improve the French economy. Colbert worked to create a favorable balance of trade and increase France's colonial holdings. He achieved a reputation for his work of improving the state of French manufacturing and bringing the economy back from the brink of bankruptcy. He reduced the national debt through more efficient taxation. His principal taxation devices included the aides, the douanes, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOCIAL: Transcript of The Lasting Social Effects of the French Revolution as evide The Lasting Social Effects of the French Revolution as evident in Mid 19th-Century France Bryttan, Mary, Daniel Social Structure before the French Revolution Large class differences between the rich and the poor French leaders were known to be very extravagant and constantly found themselves in debt The French Revolution Abolished the feudal system and monarchy of France Peasants burned and pillaged many places Mass murder of nobles and noble sympathizers Long Lasting Effects Changed the social structure beginning with the feudal system and monarchy Bourgeois and land owning classes emerged as dominant classes Caused widespread reform in other monarchies Gave…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV, also known as Le Gran Monarque and the Sun God, was not indeed such a good king for France. The reign of Louis XIV was hurtful in many ways to France and its people. First of all, Louis XIV financially destroyed France by doing things that he thought would help but just hurt France in the long run. Louis was constantly at war with another country, which not only hurt France financially, because wars were very expensive during that time, but it also depleted France¡¯s once massive army. He also persecuted the Huguenots and fifty thousand of them fled from France, many of them skilled and very well educated, which also hurt France. It seemed as if the way Louis XIV ruled France was to mainly help himself, and if he did want to make France greater, he failed to do so throughout his reign.…

    • 986 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, he fought with the Dutch since they were the one economic power that was competition to France. While France was technically the winner of the war, the six years Louis spent to keep his army fighting that war (often as entertainment for his court life) ironically depleted France’s economy. The same happened with the War of Spanish Succession: because Louis wanted his grandson to inherit Spain rather than the Hapsburgs, France was forced to resort to melting its silver while up against England, the Netherlands, the Holy Roman Empire, and German states. In between these two wars, Louis revoked the Edict of Nantes because he wanted the power that would come with winning favor of the Catholic Church, but overlooked the Hugenots economic influence. In short, Louis thought in the short-term without considering the consequences of the area he was trying to…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American and French revolutions introduced similar ideas in fixing society, but different methods of implementing ideas. The American Revolution was created by the American colonists need for financial independence from the overpowering nation of Great Britain, while the French revolution was a struggle to gain social equality among the masses. People claim that the French had a greater impact on a lot of things than the American Revolution, and I agree on it being true. Therefore, the French revolution had a greater impact on everything because it improved human rights, social equality, and being free from oppressive government. I will nextly explain the comparisons of ideas.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A revolution is a change where something past becomes modified or completely outlawed for a better future. An incalculable number of revolutions happen every minute of every day, some on a global wide scale, but most minor and insignificant. However, not everyone advocates these changes, Although the American, Haitian, and French Revolutions were revolts driven by the lack of social and political equality that their native government provided them, revolutionary leaders also underwent a social struggle to transition from the past to the future, in which they abandoned military protection, had to reconstruct society, accepting an independent and vulnerable position in the world. The American, French, and Haitian Revolutions all were revolts…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political, economic, and social conditions have led to changes to a nation and its people, which are called a revolution. A revolution is an overthrow and replacement of a government of the political system. The French Revolution happened was caused by the king, who did give his people equal rights. The revolution have many causes, events, and…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution - 1

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many issues that led up to the French Revolution. For example, the unfair tax burden. According to Document two, the Third Estate paid all of the government taxes. There were three estates. The 1st estate was all of the clergy; they had wealth because they collected taxes from the 3rd estate and they also owned land. They had power, food, liberty, and freedom. The 2nd estate was the rich titled nobility. They derived their wealth from land ownership, and they collected some taxes. They also had power, food, and freedom. The 3rd estate was separated into three different classes. The Bourgeoisie was the highest of the third estate; they had cash wealth since they were made up of the merchants, bankers, and artisans. The Bourgeoisie paid very high taxes, and had very little power, they had a food supply, but they had no power. The peasant farmers, and the city workers had no wealth, power, or liberty, and they had to pay taxes. The 1st and 2nd estate only took up about 3% of the population. The Bourgeoisie thought that the taxes were unfair to the entire 3rd estate. Document three explained how a peasant had 7 children, and couldn’t support her family, but she still had to pay taxes. This shows how unfair the tax burden was.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In France property was not equal. It was divided up into different classes. Class determined how much property citizens would have. Peasants would have the least because they were at the bottom of the class structure. During the revolution the French thought that…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In France their society system was not working. They were under a Monarchy type of government. They had three estates the first one was called the first estate (Clergy), then second estate (Nobles), and then third estate (Peasants) . This didn’t work because the third estate had to pay all of the taxes and they were the least wealthy.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effects of the French Revolution were vast and far reaching. The overthrowing of the monarchy quickly dealt a near fatal blow to the old feudal and monarchic system that had controlled Europe for centuries (Jörgensen, C). The Revolution got rid of serfdom and federal dues peasants previously had to pay to kings (Jörgensen, C). Outside of Europe, in South America, the spanish colonies saw a weakened Spain and the slave revolt in Haiti and began to free themselves of colonial rule. This overthrowing of large absolute governments was perhaps there greatest effect of the French Revolution (Jörgensen, C). As well there were cultural effects of the…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The start of the French Revolution was directly in French society. Society was constantly dominated by nobles, or a social group that was primarily made up of: aristocrats, officeholders, professionals, merchants and businessmen. The French society was broken up into three social classes, or better known as “Estates.”. The First Estate was comprised of all the clergy; the Second Estate was comprised of the nobility, and the Third Estate was comprised of everyone else, including wealthy lawyers, businessmen, urban laborers and poor peasants. The Third Estate was by far the largest social class. All of these classes had one thing in common, and that was a want for an economy that would serve their interests. The nobility depended on a constant infusion of talent and economic power form the wealthy social groups represented in the Third Estate. Less prosperous lawyers were jealous of the privileged position very few had in their profession. Over the course of the century the price of offices rose, making it more difficult to buy one’s way into nobility, and creating tensions between middling members of the Third Estate and the very rich in trade and commerce who were the only group able to afford to climb the social ladder. Several fault lines ran through the elite and the middle classes which led to resentment of the government and a need for change.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bossuet And Thomas Hobbes

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Like most absolute monarchs Louis claimed that his power was given to him by God and that he was to be representative of God here on Earth. He made himself head of the French church and revoked the Edict of Nantes, which had previously allowed tolerance towards French Protestants. He also worked, “to centralize and tighten control of France and its overseas colonies” (History.com staff). Louis gained control of France’s economic system and implemented mercantilism. He gained control over the powerful nobles through invitations to his court at his lavish palace, Versailles.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays