Preview

Indo Us Nuclear Deal

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indo Us Nuclear Deal
Following are the key aspects of the Indo-US civil nuclear deal:

* The agreement not to hinder or interfere with India's nuclear programme for military purposes.

* US will help India negotiate with the IAEA for an India-specific fuel supply agreement.

* Washington will support New Delhi develop strategic reserves of nuclear fuel to guard against future disruption of supply.

* In case of disruption, US and India will jointly convene a group of friendly supplier countries to include nations like Russia, France and the UK to pursue such measures to restore fuel supply.

* Both the countries agree to facilitate nuclear trade between themselves in the interest of respective industries and consumers.

* India and the US agree to transfer nuclear material, non-nuclear material, equipment and components.

* Any special fissionable material transferred under the agreement shall be low enriched uranium.

* Low enriched uranium can be transfered for use as fuel in reactor experiments and in reactors for conversion or fabrication.

* The ambit of the deal include research, development, design, construction, operation, maintenance and use of nuclear reactors, reactor experiments and decommissioning.

* The US will have the right to seek return of nuclear fuel and technology but it will compensate for the costs incurred as a consequence of such removal.

* India can develop strategic reserve of nuclear fuel to guard against any disruption of supply over the lifetime of its reactors.

* Agreement provides for consultations on the circumstances, including changed security environment, before termination of the nuclear cooperation.

* Provision for one-year notice period before termination of the agreement.

* The US to engage Nuclear Suppliers Group to help India obtain full access to the international fuel market, including reliable, uninteruppted and continual access to fuel supplies from firms in several nations.

* The US will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. What event led to the Nuclear Test Ban Agreement? Which 3 countries sign it and what type of nuclear test was banned? (510)…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * SALT: negotiations between the U.S. & the U.S.S.R. opened in 1969 in Helsinki designed to limit both countries’ stock of nuclear weapons.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One achievement of detente was SALT I signed in 1972. The purpose of this was to reduce the number of nuclear weapons on both sides. Although, the significance lies mainly with the basic principles agreement, were both superpowers vowed to “do their utmost to avoid military confrontations”. This brought about improvements economically since trade was encouraged and indeed, international trade increased significantly. However, grains from the US supplied the trade.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weapons proliferation: o Enrichment of reactor-­‐grade uranium can be weapons grade o Reprocessing more efficient but plutonium useful for nuclear weapons o Disposal pools and dry casks susceptible to attack 3.) Safety: once “glamorous reactors” now dreaded • Three-­‐Mile Island (1979 4.) Storage of radioactive wastes o Need to store and secure spent nuclear fuel for 10,000 to 250,000 years!…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will discuss/describe the current relationship between the U.S. and other countries since the Cold War.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes Iran

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page

    advantage. Several other countries would then want nuclear of their own and they would all…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, the fear of a nuclear conflict that arose between the two superpowers after the event of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This led to one of the earliest agreements on nuclear arms control which included the Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty in 1963 (“Détente and Arms Control”). The formal agreements made between the two superpowers assured the security of the people against a possible nuclear attack which benefited both sides. Further negotiations continued with the Conference on Security and Cooperation. They emerged with an act that “recognized political borders, established military confidence building measures, created opportunities for trade and cultural exchange, and promoted human rights” (“Détente and Arms Control”). It presented both sides willingness to agree upon economic, and humanitarian solutions regarding the tensions between them. However, the era of Detente came to an unsatisfying halt. Public dissatisfaction and the continued competition increasingly manifested as they further intervene in the third World (“Détente and Arms Control”). It ended in a stalled progress on arms control and brought them back to the brink of confrontation. In conclusion, Detente was an event that showed vast improvements in the use of aid to create common…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military insurgents

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    has been a long time concern of the US that if able to develop any type of significant nuclear technology…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [1] Howlett, Darryl ‘Nuclear Proliferation’ in John Baylis and Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics (Oxford: OUP, 2001, second edition)…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Market

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages

    “G8 split on nuclear power in energy security talks.” EU Business. March 16, 2006. Available at: http://www.eubusiness.com/Energy/060316103012.mt2l023a.…

    • 6329 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia clearly understands that under today's conditions the spread of nuclear weapons, together with missile vehicles of their' delivery, would be fraught with generating strategic turmoil, Increased risk of regional conflicts and use of nuclear weapons. Quite naturally, it is urgent to counteract such a course of events. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the main factor allowing the community to hold back such a development of events, providing at the same time for the development of international cooperation in the sphere of peaceful use of nuclear energy. That is why Russia attaches great importance to the comprehensive and impartial consideration of the NPT functioning.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within fourteen months of its initiation, in July 2015, negotiations between Austria and Iran was successfully concluded as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was signed my Iran, the P5 + 1, the European Union and Kurz. In a press release, Kurz shared his satisfaction on the conclusion of the agreement and emphasised reinforcement of Austria as a place of dialogue (Europe Integration Foreign Affairs, 2015). Kurz shared his point of view regarding nuclear weapons: “The only way to guarantee that nuclear weapons will never be used again is through their total elimination, all states share the responsibility to prevent the use of nuclear…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    India's Nuclear Weapons

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This event is in the news because a country violated a law that the entire world agreed on not doing anymore. India have always wanted to become nuclear, and their wish came true. They accepted their consequences of being nuclear, but they are happy. It's neighboring country Pakistan and India have had two wars, and always competed to be the best, and so far India is winning, because India have about 65 warheads and Pakistan have about 25 warheads. India have also declared they have nuclear capability were as Pakistan have not. India is exceptionally proud of having nuclear power, after conducting their first test in 1976, and then five in the year 1998. India have always wanted to be known for something to do with military and now they have accomplished that goal.<br><br>Proposals have been suggested for this problem, but only two countries have sort of resolved the problem. Japan and America have put sanctions on India. Japan have froze all bank access to India from their banks, but trade is still continuing. America its most dependent country have put money sanctions on India, in which now it will now effect India's economy. India is 14.5 billion dollars in debut. If I could have a chance to resolve this problem, I would let them keep there nuclear power, but would have to lay down some rules on what they can't do and what they can do. I would not allow anymore nuclear test's. I would also make it mandatory that the bombs have to reach a certain requirement.<br><br>India's past prime ministers have been scared of becoming nuclear, but it has been the India's citizens dream to become nuclear, and now there dream has become a reality. In recent news of India, their economy is dropping rapidly, and is making no attempt to rise. There is only one problem with nukes they hold. There nukes, Russia's, China's, Frances all are short range nukes, which go about 5000 miles. The only two countries that it's nukes can mostly reach any were in the world is the United…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays