Preview

Indian Removal Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Policy
As a result of his Indian removal policy, the Choctaws were the first to sign a treaty promising to relocate. Most the Seminoles refused to sign with only a portion agreeing to a removal treaty in 1833, with most refusing to abandon their home land the Second Seminole War of 1833 was fought and subdued in a third war. With other tribes following suite; the Creeks signed a removal treaty in 1832 and the Chickasaws moved in 1837. Although it was the removal of the Cherokee that would forever blemish Jacksons presidency and Americas history. The Cherokees had once fought alongside Jackson and viewed him as an ally, but even a chieftain who had previously been under Jacksons command said, “Ah! My life and the lives of my people were then at stake for you and your country. I then thought Jackson my best friend. But, ah! Jackson no serve me right. Your country no do me justice now.” (Gale) Troops forcefully removed the natives to relocate them, which would infamously become known as the “Trail of Tears.” Many times, Jackson attempted to justify his actions by claiming he had a paternalistic view of the Native Americans, he described them as “children in need of guidance, and believed the removal policy was beneficial to the Indians” (Cave) Although the realistic truth is that the Cherokees were tricked into …show more content…
A country that was based on equal treatment, tolerance for others, and fought for their own basic human rights, stripped the Native Americans of their own and degraded their culture. The Indian Removal act was genocide. It represented a time when Americans were hypocritical; while they demanded rights, they denied other races the same treatment. The legacy that was left behind from the Indian Removal act was one of destruction, there is nothing that justifies the disdain and selfishness behind the federal government’s approval of the act, or the support it received from the white

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s presidency also focused on issues of westward expansion. Pursuing paths of “civilization,” Native Americans of the Southeast engaged in extensive agricultural and educational development. But pressure from white settlers and from the state governments proved overwhelming, and Jackson finally supported the forced removal of all southeastern Indians to Oklahoma along the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions on Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was an act of cruelty or a fair policy, but the policy did not benefit Native Americans.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy DBQ

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their beliefs verified to not apply to the Indians when Jackson, with the support of his administration, exiled them from their ancestral lands and drove them along the "Trail of Tears" to new "homelands" in Oklahoma. [Doc G] Jackson did this even after the Cherokee were established as an independent nation. After defing the Supreme Court by doing this, Jackson defended this horrendous decision by claiming that the Indians would be better off "out of the way" and that the occurrence was a "voluntary" migration west of the…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many had intermarried with Europeans and lived settled lives in farming communities. The Cherokee had written their own constitution, based on the United States Constitution, they had started a newspaper, and had built roads, schools, and churches. As immigrants poured into the United States, however, land became scarce. The Indians had land; the settlers wanted it. Suddenly, it was not enough that some of the native tribes had become very much like the white Americans. At first, the Cherokee in Georgia tried to fight the Indian Removal Act by taking the government to court. In 1832, the Supreme Court ruled against Georgia. (Smith 134) even with the Court’s ruling, the Indian removal act continued. President Jackson ignored the Supreme Court’s verdict, handed down by Chief Justice John Marshall. The President was reported to have said, “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it!” (O’Neill 11). By the end of the decade, tens of thousands of Indians had been moved west. Thousands died on the long, difficult march, which became known as the Trail of…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is very difficult to prove racism as a driving factor of an issue, but when reading Jackson’s address to Congress regarding the issue of Indian removal, it is evident that there was prejudice and discrimination present in this context. Jackson calls the Indians “savage hunters”, impediments to “white settlement”, and hopes that they will “cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, Christian community.” Throughout Jackson’s address, it is clear that he believes Colonial settlements and cities are more important to the nation than any Indian matters, and he attempts to lessen the severity of an enormous relocation…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More land is benefit for a country of course americans want to make their country grow better so they need more land, so now we gong to talk about should Indians move? Of course that the Cherokee should move,Cause of the threat from the U.S.invaders ,and the U.S. leaders of already signed the Indian removal act,and they move is for avoid more sacrifice of their people, the whole nation.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As more and more people migrated to the United States, the government felt that settlers needed more space in the US Territory. They had already forced several Native American tribes off of “US land” by the time Andrew Jackson was President. In the Southwestern United States, the Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw tribes excelled in interacting with new settlers. Jackson had been able to maintain a peaceful relationship with these tribes and had even raised a Creek orphan alongside his own son. Although he did not treat them as if they were strangers, he still saw them as inferior. He forced the tribes to split and absorb into the American way of life. At the beginning of his presidency, the Cherokee’s tribal and state governments began…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson also known as, ‘Old Hickory’ promoted many policies that impacted the young nation. Known for his authoritarian style during his presidency it was no surprise Jackson would be harsh with the Native Americans and treat the Indians with no mercy while doing so. “Like most white frontiersmen. Jackson viewed Indians as barbarians without rights…” (Shi & Tindall 2015 p. 330) this influenced his decision to request congress to approve the Indian Removal Act. By debating this request congress allowed the president to neglect all prior treaties/negotiations to protect the lands of the Native American’s forefathers where they were residing. This would fuel the fire between many Americans because they had divided opinions on this matter,…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Guess who was behind that grand scheme. He even pressured the Choctaw to sign a treaty that forced them selves out of Mississippi. For the rest he sent troops to forcibly eradicate the Sauk and Fox from Illinois and Missouri and kicked the Chickasaw out of Alabama and Mississippi. He sent them all out west. The only Indians who put up a fight were the Cherokees. Their case went to the Supreme Court in Worcester vs. Georgia and they won because they were a political community who Georgia was not allowed to take land from. So what does Jackson do? He ignores the whole court ruling! They kept on fighting but only the Cherokees who were in favor of relocating to Oklahoma were considered representatives. They signed the Treaty of New Echota, which gave their land to the government for 5 million dollars and land in Oklahoma. This occurrence resulted in the infamous "Trail of Tears," one of the saddest moments in history. Jackson's treatment of the Natives was horrendous at the…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 1838, the journey of Cherokees began in what was known to history as the Trail of Tears. The Trail of tears involved thirteen parties of the Cherokee being forced by U.S. army troop under Andrew Jackson presidency to leave their residence in the southeast and migrate to the west. The discovery of gold in northern Georgia in 1828 and compulsion for the accessibility of more land to settle the growing white population contributed to more local delirium for the Indian dismissal. With the Election of Andrew Johnson – a man known for his believe that Native Americans had no legitimate titles to their lands and should be removed from them, congress voted in 1830 the Indian removal bill. Notwithstanding, during this period, a heated debate…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays