Incompatibilism V. Compatibilism

Good Essays
Incompatibilism v. Compatibilism

There are two prevailing incompatibilist views concerning free will, hard Determinism or Libertarianism. The former asserts that if determinism is true, then free will is nonexistent and humans are essentially robots following a path determined for us from our past and natural laws. The latter denies that determinism is true and thus appears to introduce randomness as an explanation to account for free will. Compatibilists claim that free will and determinism can coexist. For the scope of this paper I will consider the three prevailing arguments for the existence of free will or lack thereof and argue that a compatibilist view plausible view for the existence of free will. First I will attempt to show that determinism and free will can coexist, thus rejecting the Hard Determinism argument. Next I will claim that Libertarianism does not effectively rule out determinism, by focusing on the Quantum Mechanics response. Finally I will attempt to point out a relationship between responsibility and compatibilism.
Determinism and Compatibilism
The thesis of causal determinism states that every event has a cause and that human, an event, is no exception to the rule. Thoroughly put, if we know all of the physical facts and causal laws about a situation, we can determine what will occur next. Meaning that beliefs and actions cause our actions, and our past causes our beliefs and desires (i.e. parents/grandparents). The Hard Determinist argument, which flows from the thesis of causal determination, states the following :
1) Everything we do is caused by forces over which we have no control.
2) If our actions are causes by forces which we have no control, we do not act freely.
3) Therefore, we never act freely.
The Hard Determinist argument appears to be in conflict with whether we act freely rather than “free will” or our ability to make choices. Using a thought experiment I will attempt to explain the different between acting freely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compatibilism

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    thoughts and actions are determined by cause and effect implications. It is vital that we are “free to do otherwise” since this gives us accountability for our actions and allows us to attain moral responsibility. Unlike John Martin Fischer’s semi-compatibilism, I hold that determinism does not rule out all alternative actions encompassing “that we can never do otherwise.” I find the compatibilists definition of freedom convincing enough that I can agree to the thesis that determinism exists and that…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compatibilism

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    independent grounds; (2) accept its reality but argue for its compatibility with free will; or (3) accept its reality and deny its compatibility with free will.In this paper I am going to be defending the view compatibilism, specifically W. T. Stace’s view of compatibilism. Compatibilism is the idea that determinism is true, every event in the world is caused, and that free will still exists. Stace defends this view by saying the problem is the definition of free will. The current definition of…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harding on Compatibilism

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Patricia M. Barragán June 17, 2012 Philo. 154B; C. Normore Final Paper; Harding on Compatibilism Compatibilism is the idea that freedom of the will and determinism are harmonious. Susan Wolf an advocate for compatibilism in support of her own personal theory argues, “agent freedom cannot enhance freedom of choice or responsibility” (338 Harding). Instead claims that, ‘“an individual is responsible if and only is she able to form her actions on the basis of her values and she is able to form…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compatibilists are semantic conservatives; they recognize that they don’t have libertarian free will; their definition of freewill is different. Compatibilism is an attempt to reconcile free will with determinism. Morality requires free will, free will requires choice; Determinism rules out free will. From the Wiki on Determinism “Another topic of debate is the implication that Determinism has on morality. Hard determinism (a belief in determinism, and not free will) is particularly criticized for…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Debate Between Libertarianism and Hard Incompatibilism 2,062 Words Philip Samaan 1000634986 PHL105, 30/03/2014 Prof. J. Brunning Mark Schranz Robert Kane argues for the existence of free will and for the existence of a deep connection between free will and moral responsibility. Kane firstly establishes that individuals possessing surface freedoms, such as buying what they will at a convenience store or watching what they will on a television set, do not necessarily indicate…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compatibilism Is it possible to act freely if all of our decisions were already predetermined? This interesting question is connected to the most discussed philosophical question. Every philosopher wants to know, “Do human beings ever act freely?” Incompatibilist and compatibilist have been going back and forth about it for years. Compatibilist believe that determinism and free will can both exist. In this paper, we will define determinism, free will, compatibilism, and incompatiblism. I will show…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism, and discuss in detail which you think is the most convincing position in the free will debate. There are three main positions in the free will debate; determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism. In my opinion, the strongest argument of these is compatibilism due to it agreeing with my views and beliefs on the subject of free will. Firstly, determinism, sometimes called hard determinism, is the belief that every event or human action is unavoidable…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    determinist, libertarians, and compatibilism. Determinism is the idea that every action you take is heavily influenced by outside forces and past events. A hard determinist has the belief that that people have no free will and therefore no one is responsible for their actions because they were predetermined. Conversely, people with libertarian views of free will believes that our choices are entirely our own and we are not bound by a determined future. Compatibilism is like determinism but with the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will, Determinism or Compatibilism? “What I am going to do? Maybe I should do this instead of that? ” Those are some questions which arose when we are facing choices but, do we always have the choice or we just follow the situation or circumstance? Freewill is the power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external (usually psychological) or by an agency such as fate or divine will, while determinism is the belief that since each momentary state of the world entails all…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays