Preview

In a Highly Dynamic and Turbulent Environment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In a Highly Dynamic and Turbulent Environment
In a highly dynamic and turbulent environment, some mangers of organizations seek to plan their change strategy in the light of circumstances, whilst others have change thrust upon them.
Therefore, it benefits all mangers to obtain a better understanding of the relationship between the organization and its environment and react accordingly.

Introduction
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the statement above and discuss the skills a manager might need to be successful in a increasingly fast changing and growing complexity business environment.

No matter what form of the organization that you work for, for example, a profit making company, a public sector bodies or voluntary charitable group. We all have been experiencing the impact of the environment that surrounding organization. Accordingly, studying the environment and managing the impact are essential to survive or gain competitive advantage.

Changing School of Management Thought
Before we talk about the environment, I would like to briefly exploring some of the major schools of management thought. This is important to know that not only the environment is changing rapidly, but also the way we see the world is shifting. Each of the schools of thought, in their day, represents the major paradigms and reflects the business environment surrounding them in their eras.

These schools of thought are the ‘paradigms’ of management referred to by Clarke and Clegg in their book “Changing Paradigms – The Transformation of Management Knowledge for the 21st Century.”(Clarke & Clegg, 2000) . Since “Clarke and Clegg define paradigms as models or frameworks that we use to help us perceive, perceive, understand and interpret the world around us.” (R A Cowe B&miC Lec1, 2008).
We can understand the change happens in business world by studying different schools of thoughts and paradigms in different time. Thus we can compare the complexity of nowadays environment with early year environment.

The major



Bibliography: Clarke & Clegg, (2000) Changing Paradigms – The Transformation of Management Knowledge for the 21st Century.” R A Cowe B&miC Lec1, (2008) Bhagwati, Jagdish (2004). In Defense of Globalization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Rowman & Littlefield. (2004)Sheila L. Croucher. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity a Changing World. Emery,R.E & Trist, E.L., (1969) Systems Thinking, Penguin,. F. Heylighen,(1998) Basic Concepts of the Systems Approach Brown et al. (2002). Brown, Alan; Rhodes, Ed; Carter, Ruth. Innovative attempts to support learning through continuing vocational education and training in advanced supply systems in the automotive and aerospace industries.. David Bobby, (2008). Management – An Introduction 4th edition

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Hrm 587 Final Project

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Now-a-days change is mandatory for each and every sector in the world, as the change is happening too fast as there is a increase of globalization and technological updates which is making it much faster than any thing. All the organizations are trying hard to change their pace as we can see that technological changes have not only affected the organization but also each individual because of its global reach, and the availability of the information is too much than it was before. All the firms are downsizing themselves and societies are becoming decentralized.…

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U010A1 Final Paper

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Change management entails thoughtful planning, sensitive implementation and involvement of the people affected by the change. Since managing change in organizations requires adhering to personal as well as the organizational needs of the people involved in the change, it should be holistic, achievable and measurable. Utilizing these principles of change will require reevaluating how we propose change management strategies as it relates to business decisions and processes. If you force change on people, problems will arise and resistance to change processes will build (businessballs.com).…

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Norton Company vs 3m

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of the article about the Norton Company and 3M, the quantitative and systems school of management thought was presented. The Norton Company adopted this school of thought since that was their technique to expand new product lines. Even though the company started on the time during the classical school of management thought was used mostly, wherein there should be a developed efforts to find the best way to perform and managed tasks, their management team or board of directors division was not doing a good job in their operations. They have sophisticated management teams that made the approval of decisions too complicated and maybe time consuming. This did not made The Norton Company embraced the classical school of management thought. The Norton Company thought that the use of Quantitative and systems schools of management will improve their decision making through the use of quantitative techniques. The Norton Company used scientific improvement such as computer modeling because they were thinking that this will improve their product lines and in the long run will improve the company. On the other hand, 3M Company is more on the classical school on management thought. They are more focused on the workforce and how they will deal with each individual’s initiative, which is more on developing each individual to contribute to a better job.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Burnes, B (2004) Managing change: a strategic approach to organisational dynamics. 4th Edition. Financial Times/ Prentice Hall…

    • 5138 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The diverse approaches to management have been fine tuned. Changed and discarded above the years. In this paper we will take a glance at the contemporary approaches. We will scrutinize how they evaluate to each other in addition to if they can be employed in the 3 sorts of environments; competitive, internal, and macro environment.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cole, G.A. (2004) Management – theory and Practice – Sixth Edition. London, South Western CENAGE learning…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In companies there are factors that create a need for change. Some changes are motivated from external forces, such as competition or updating technology. Other changes are motivated by internal forces, such as employee attitudes, new equipment, and redesigning of jobs. When implementing changes the person who implements those changes are called a change agent. A change agent can be a manager or a non-manager. Mangers make smaller, less drastic changes and are more cautious about the outcome. Non-managers tend to make larger, more drastic changes because they do not have to deal with the repercussion of the change (Robbins, DeCenzo, & Coulter, 2011).…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Change Initiative

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Managing change requires a vision which supports a renewal process (Moran & Brightman, 2001). Change doesn’t (or shouldn’t) occur for the sake of change. The stress which change places upon an organization isn’t likely to justify the price in terms of its effect on the people which make up the organization. Rather, change should be gauged in terms of its resultant ability to adapt to the needs of the organization’s external and internal customers (Burke, 2002). This should serve as…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Johnson, G. & Scholes, K., 2009, Exploring Corporate Strategy, London: FT Prentice Hall. (Various editions)…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The evolution of management thought is divided into two major sections: classical approaches and contemporary approaches. All the approaches attempted to explain the real issues that the managers are facing and provide them with tools to solve future problems.…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983)…

    • 6263 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management and Daniel A. Wren

    • 11014 Words
    • 45 Pages

    As management historians, we are seldom able to trace the formative thinking of our field 's major contributors, especially its founders. McMahon and Carr (1999, p. 228) noted the ``increasing distance between students and scholars of today and the early writers in the development of management thought . . . The current generation of students are reading less of the actual writings of the early scholars and more what those writing current texts are attributing to [them]. ' ' At best, by examining contemporary accounts, or in the limited instances where autobiographies exist, we can…

    • 11014 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Sheila L. Croucher. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a Changing World. Rowman & Littlefield. (2004). p.10…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheila L. C. (2004). Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a Changing World. Boston: Rowman & L ittlefield.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper we will try to see about history of management, the two main schools of thoughts and their interrelation with one another and the development of modern management theories, people who lead for the foundation of these ideas, what is the main difference between these ideas and how they were developed. We will also try to demonstrate how they have evolved to reflect the changing needs of organizations and society as a whole. The above points will be discussed below in the paper.…

    • 4532 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics