top-rated free essay

“In re Gault Case”

By apple841 Sep 26, 2013 282 Words
In the case of “In re Gault” it was a landmark decision, which finally gave Juveniles the same due processes of adults. The U.S Supreme Court made this decision in 1967 after hearing the case of fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault. Gerald Gault was arrested on the morning of June 8, 1964, by the sheriff of Gila County, Arizona. The neighbor called the police saying that Gerald Gault called her house and used inappropriate and offensive language. The sheriff showed up to Gault’s residence arresting Gerald Gault without notifying the mother of Gerald. Gerald Gault claimed his friend called the woman and said the things to her, and that he had nothing to do with it. Gault’s preliminary hearing was the next morning, which ended when the judge said he would "think about it". Gault remained in custody for several more days until being released without explanation. He then received notice to appear at another court date. At this date the judge ordered that Gault was to be confined at the State Industrial School, until the age of 21. At the hearing the prosecution presented no evidence and no witnesses. In the state of Arizona at the time permitted no appeal in juvenile cases. Until the U.S supreme court had a 8-1 vote in favor of Gault.

The Gerald Gault case led to a new way of dealing with juveniles. Gault had a lot of misguided rulings that threw him into the State Industrial School. Juveniles now have the same due process rights as adults, allowing juveniles the same opportunities to defend themselves. All the mistakes in the In re Gault Case, eventually led to something good for juveniles rights from that point forward.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • In Re Gault

    ...On the morning of June 8, 1964, the sheriff of Gila County, Arizona took into custody one Gerald Gault, without notifying his parents, after his neighbor, Mrs. Ora Cook, reported receiving a offense and inappropriate phone call from the 15 year old boy. Once his mother found out where he was, the county’s Children’s Detention Home, she was n...

    Read More
  • Rev Re Case

    ...Revenue Recognition Case Part 1 It has been noted that “the $25 Referral Credit represents the fair value of the cost Runway would pay to acquire a new customer from an unrelated third party or marketing firm who is not a purchaser of its products.” This is a type of cost experienced by the Runaway Discount to market its products, which must...

    Read More
  • Re

    ... Re-Organization and Layoff: Solutions Paper Week 4, Team C Assignment PHL/320 Aug. 03, 2015 Oni Boston Re-Organization and Layoff: Solutions Paper Introduction A solution is a means of solving a problem or dealing with a difficult situation. (Dictionary). Identifying solutions for a business or company is imperative for it...

    Read More
  • Case

    ...registered at the Ministry of Justice practice (particularly in Vietnams Ministry of Finance). Socially independent auditors have no common interests, no relationship with the audited firm. The work of independent external auditor Check the legality and validity of the documents, accounting data, the execution of policies, accounting practices,...

    Read More
  • Case Study Hm Res

    ...test is not causing EEO issues like adverse impact where a applicant feels like the test unfairly discriminate against a protective or non-protective group. The burden of proof lies on the employer to prove that his/her test are directly related to success or failure on the job. Testing should never be used as a selection tool, it should be view...

    Read More
  • Case Study Munich Re

    ...Josh Bridges International Marketing (MWF: 10-1050) Case Study 2 – Munich Re 8/29/2014 Since the late 1800s, Munich Re has been a leader in the field of reinsurance business, and is the largest reinsurance company in the world. The company has been tasked with many challenges throughout its tenure, but continues to strive to be better....

    Read More
  • Criminal Justice: Gideon vs. Wainwright, U.S. vs. Bagley, and In re Gault

    ...they had not. Two of the government’s witnesses, O’Conner and Mitchell were state law enforcement officers who had been working undercover to assist the ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). At trial, Respondent was found guilty of the narcotics charges, but not the firearm charges. Sometime later, he filed requests for information pursuant t...

    Read More
  • Conflict of Laws - Analysis of the Case of Re Midleton Settlement

    ...RELATING TO PROPERTY IN CONFLICT OF LAWS WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE CASE OF RE MIDLETON’S SETTLEMENT INTRODUCTION Conflict of laws involves situations when there is a foreign element in a case. There are three main questions which arise for determination in conflict of laws: choice of jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition an...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.