The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…
The second amendment states that all citizens have the right to bear arms, the first draft of this amendment, from James Madison, Federalist Papers No. 46. James Madison states that; “ A regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.” .He also states , “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” What James Madison is basically saying is that citizens should have the right…
America should have better gun control for many reasons, people don’t feel safe with others having guns because they believe criminals have a higher advantage of killing innocent people and could cause more trouble. Even if it is the police’s job to protect us from this happening, there are others that take the advantage from using their gun and they make big mistakes with it. America must have a different way to control gun safety and gun laws should be stricter.…
The second amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (The United States Constitution). Most gun control supporters will claim that this was written during a time when militias were needed during the war with the British and that we now have the U.S. Military to protect us. These people who fight against the Second Amendment do not understand that we will always have enemies.…
The Second Amendment to the US Constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The layman’s meaning of militia is citizen soldiers. The early American’s believed that a militia was a better security to their liberties than a permanent army. Today, the word militia can be associated with the National Guard. The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that state and local governments were required to recognize an individual right to possess firearms. The court also recognized that laws to prohibit gun possession by felons and the mentally ill were acceptable and so were laws banning guns from schools, government buildings and laws regulating gun sales. This ruling in 2010 was brought to the Supreme Court because of a Chicago law that banned almost all handguns to individuals, which many believed denied them of their so-called Constitutional right to bear…
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." ("Second Amendment to the United States Constitution"). Today, the interpretation of the amendment has polarized the American people among two different views (Greenslade, 2004). Those opposed to private ownership of firearms agrue that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms because the Second Amendment refers to the people 's collective right as a members of a well-regulated State militia. In contrast, the individual right view holds that individuals may bring claims or raise challenges based on a violation of their rights under the Second Amendment just as they do to vindicate individual rights secured by other provisions of the Bill of Rights. This view appears to be the most valid after placing the Second Amendment in appropriate historical and Constitutional context.…
The language used in the second amendment has a lot to do with the different interpretations as it reads, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The first part, “A well…
The text of the Second Amendment of America’s constitution is as followed “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. amend. II). This small portion of text has been widely debated and analyzed over the years to determine exactly what it entails in order to discover what rights it actually grants United States citizens, if any. Over the course of our nations brief existence we, as a people, have had the pleasure of practicing our right of self-preservation through the tools that have been bestowed upon us via the Second Amendment. However, some individuals have grown comfortable in an existence where…
The Second Amendment and the right to bear arms has always been a part of American culture and history, the right to bear arms is as American as apple pie and westerns, but it has and always will be a hot topic and the wording and meaning of the Second Amendment comes into question frequently. The currently accepted meaning of the Second Amendment is that it gives militias and individuals the right to bear arms, the right to own firearms (“Second Amendment to the United States Constitution”). However even though the right to bear arms is given to every American it can be revoked, many states have sensible laws that restrict where you can take a firearm and who can own them, and many Americans support these restrictions even though they technically…
The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.…
The Second Amendment States: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a…
The way that an individual interprets the wording of the Second Amendment influences their point of view on who has the right to "keep and bear arms" (Amendment 2). The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is because the Second Amendment does not clearly define whom "the people" are. This ambiguity has left room for action by legislative bodies and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." (Amendment 2).…
“A new way to tackle gun deaths.” Is an article by Nicholos Kristof posted by Nytimes.com on October 3rd. Detailing the statistics of gun related deaths since 1970, and explaining ways to prevent gun fatalities.…