top-rated free essay

Imperialism Dbq

By sidewalkclosed Mar 21, 2011 1041 Words
Imperialism DBQ
Between 1898 and 1914, the United States had many strategic, economic, and ethnocentric motivations for practicing Imperialism. While America was imperialist mostly for strategic reasons, strategic and economic factors often coincided, and America’s motivations almost always had undertones of ethnocentrism. During this time period, American imperialism was most prominent in the Caribbean. One major example was when the U.S. intervened in Cuba to help liberate them from Spanish rule. Congress even passed the Teller Amendment, which granted Cuba its freedom after it was set loose from Spain. However, the U.S. mandated that the Platt Amendment be written into the Cuban Constitution. The Amendment stipulated that Cuba not acquire any debt greater than it could pay off, or enter into any treaties which potentially compromised its liberty. While this event occurred before 1898, it still exemplifies American imperialism, and highlights America’s strategic motivations. One way, in which this was a strategic intervention by the U.S., was that it gave Spain less power in the Western Hemisphere, and America acquired the islands of Guam and Puerto Rico. In Alfred T. Mahan’s book, The Interest of America in Sea Power, he expresses the idea that U.S. held on to the islands, and in Cuba’s case, passed the Platt Amendment, to ensure that no other European powers, such as Germany, would attempt to control the nations (Document H). Thus, to strengthen America’s strategic interests in the Caribbean, Roosevelt issued his famous Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine in 1904. It stated that the U.S. reserved the right to intervene in Caribbean and Latin American affairs, especially to pay off their debts to other countries. The summation of America’s Caribbean policy can be seen as having a mostly strategic background, for the U.S. was primarily concerned with ensuring that no European power took advantage of any country by holding them in their debt. Yet, the reasons for keeping Eastern powers out of the West were often connected to economic interests. U.S. interference in Cuba was largely due to the fact that farmers were striking against the Spanish government, and the U.S. needed to appease the farmers since many Americans had much invested in Cuban crops. This idea was even expressed in a 1900s quote, which claimed “where the American dollar goes, so goes the American flag” (Document I). Yet, what America didn’t have invested in the Caribbean was made up for with, as U.S. diplomat to China Charles Denby stated, a “foothold…in the Far East,” which gave America “standing, influence…[and] valuable trade” “near the center of the great lines of commerce from the East to the West” (Document A). Another instance which demonstrates American imperialism in the late 1800s, but before 1898, was the construction of the Panama Canal. The canal was key to America’s ability to ship things from East to West, by cutting through the Caribbean, highlighting America’s economic interest in the region. All of these economic factors can be seen as strategic as well, for they were all means to gain power and success in the global economic competition. The Roosevelt Corollary intended to keep Eastern powers out of Western affairs primarily to prevent them from having an economic or political advantage over the U.S. Yet both of these factors were rooted in the idea that the U.S. had the right to dominate the Western hemisphere. Whites, and Americans in particular, have long held onto the belief in the superiority of their own race. In his novel Our Country: Its Possible Future, Josiah Strong even wrote that God had prepared the whites most adequately for “the final competition of races” by giving them “unequalled energy.” His views are also made clear when he refers to Anglo-Saxons as having “the largest liberty, the purest Christianity, the highest civilization” (Doc C). These claims were furthered by Julius Pratt in his novel Expansionists of 1898, when he wrote that “the superior virility of the American race” had created a “superior beneficence of American political institutions” (Doc F). Many Americans believed that a white man’s burden existed to advance other civilizations, since Americans were the most advanced people on Earth. The New York Tribune applied this idea to the Caribbean policy in 1903, when it was written that even “cannibals…[and] the half-ape creatures of the Australian backcountry…[and the] wildest tribes” govern themselves. Yet, upholding the belief in the supremacy of the American government, they cynically asked of the beastly nations, “but what kind of government is it” (Document E). Still, the most pressing evidence that both American strategic and economic motivations were rooted in ethnocentrism is found by closely examining the Roosevelt Corollary of 1904. When Roosevelt wrote this addition to the Monroe Doctrine, he provided for exceptions that permitted Imperialism. He stated that “chronic wrongdoing” and “impotence” of another country, which resulted in the “loosening of the ties of civilized society,” would require “intervention by some civilized nation” (Doc G.) In this corollary, his terms such as “wrongdoing”, “impotence,” and “civilized” are all completely subject to American interpretation. Thus, he not only implies that other countries must behave according to how America sees fit, but he determines that no other nations of the world except for America, may interpret what actions constitute intervention. He also demeans the presumably Caribbean nations by suggesting that they might require assistance from some superior nation that is “civilized.” Furthermore, Roosevelt’s belief in the superiority of America is reflected in his argument that the U.S. should be the only nation to control the affairs of the entire Western half of the world, and by prohibiting Eastern nations from intervening. It is clear how both strategic and economic factors led to American Imperialism during the early 1900s, yet all guidelines for foreign policy stemmed from American ethnocentrism. The U.S. believed it reserved the right to control other countries that it deemed inferior, and essentially used other nations as economic and political tools. American Imperialism was not always just to gain power for the U.S., but it was also to make sure no other nations were able gain said power.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Notes on Colonialism and Imperialism

    ...Chapter 33 Notes * Foundations of empire * Motives of imperialism * Modern imperialism * Refers to domination of industrialized countries over subject lands * Domination achieved through trade, investment, and business activities * Two types of modern colonialism * Colonies ruled and populated by migrants * Coloni...

    Read More
  • Imperialism: British Empire and Imperialist Powers Spheres

    ...Age of Imperialism 1870-1914 Main Idea: The industrialized nations conquered native lands in Africa, Asia/Pacific and Latin America and exploited these lands and the native people. Imperialism: one countries domination of the political, economic and social life of another country. A. Causes of the “New Imperialism” *1...

    Read More
  • imperialism

    ... Without imperialism the industrial revolution would not have happened. Many of the reasons were because it required materials from around the world and the laborers to acquire the materials and man the materials. Another reason would be power,there wouldn’t be power without imperialism, North America would...

    Read More
  • Imperialism Debate Essay

    ...the selected civilization. While the imperials ruled, they usually ‘robbed’ the land of its resources with little payback. These schemes obviously allowed for the imperial powers to gain a large profit and gain dominance. Imperialism was an effective and successful way for civilized countries to gain control over an indigenous countries. So,...

    Read More
  • Imperialism

    ...two parties. At this time imperialism and anti-imperialism were the dominant topics regarding America's destiny. One argument backing U.S. imperialism is by naval strategist, Alfred Thayer Mahan. At this time, Great Britain had the strongest sea power. Mahan states that America's navy must be as strong to compete in trade and war. Expansio...

    Read More
  • Justifications for Imperialism

    ...US History Justifications for Imperialism American imperialism is the economic, military, and cultural influence of the United States on other countries. Although some might say the US wasn't justified in becoming an imperial power because of Social Darwinist Thinking, world power, and religion, overall, they were justified because of milit...

    Read More
  • American Imperialism - 1

    ...APUSH Mrs. Cox 3/7/2013 (B) In the late 1800s, the United States embarked on a new wave of expansionism during which it acquired overseas territories. Explain the reasons for this new wave of expansionism. American Imperialism has been a part of United States history since the American Revolution. Imperialism is practice by powerful n...

    Read More
  • American Imperialism: Chart and Prompts

    ...Associate Program Material Appendix A American Imperialism Part 1 Complete the chart by identifying the following: Identify the countries or areas where the United States engaged in imperialistic actions during the period from about 1870 to 1914. Discuss why each area was important to American empire building—political, economic, and ...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.