Agree or Disagree: The Age of Imperialism Improved the Human Condition
Imperialism is the policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force. This policy was practiced by the Western Europeans throughout the 18th and 19th century. When they were colonizing what they classified as weaker nations, the colonizer and the colonized viewed the experience of imperialism in very different ways. The conquered nations of Africa, India, Middle East, and Indochina experienced the takeover by the Europeans but the effect of this was on the negative side. Based on the colonized countries, the Age of Imperialism did not improve the human condition.
During the 1700s, the Agricultural Revolution took place in England. Wealthy landowners started to buy a large amount of the small farms that dominated the land of England where the village farmers had once worked. As an aftermath, the landowners dramatically improved farming methods by creating inventions that made farming more efficient. These innovations forced the start to an agricultural revolution. However, as inventions started to increase, it affected workers. Many workers had lost their jobs and had to move to the city to become factory workers. Urbanization occurred making the cities boom up with factories, new transportation methods, and the population shifted from rural areas to urban. This was the start of the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution had made its mark on Western Europe between the late 18th and 19th century. It had started in England and it signified the shift from making goods by hand to making them by machine. England had all the right conditions for the Industrial Revolution to occur. It had a large population of workers, extensive amount of natural resources, an expanding economy, and political stability. However, abundant raw materials were needed in order to sustain an industrialized economy because raw materials like cotton could be transformed...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document