Preview

Imperial Tobacco Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Imperial Tobacco Case Summary
Imperial Tobacco V B.C
Sources:
http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7957/index.do

http://cases.slaw.ca/post/9016675116/british-columbia-v-imperial-tobacco-canada-ltd-et-al

Facts:
-The British Columbia Government sued the Imperial Tobacco company.
-The reason they sued was because the British Columbia government wanted the Imperial Tobacco company to pay for all the medical treatment for individuals that become ill because of smoking.
-The B.C government also wanted to sue Imperial Tobacco for having no product liability.
-Product liability is when a company must label all of the positives and negatives of the product.
-Tobacco companies didn't put on their products that they will give you cancer or any
…show more content…
Meaning that the light and mild cigarettes were no different than the regular cigarettes.
-Tobacco companies want to find contribution and damages from Canada.
-The Tobacco company issued third-party notices to the Government of Canada alleging that if they were held liable they were entitled to compensation from the government for false misrepresentation, false design and failure to warn, as well as equity.
-The B.C government wants every province to be able to sue tobacco companies to up to $10 billion for health
…show more content…
I believe this because customers that smoked cigarettes but didn't know that it caused cancer should be compensated for all damages that has developed. And with anyone that 2nd hand smoked the product before product liability was put into action. (Although it might a bit harder to prove that). But anyone that develops cancer after Imperial tobacco put the product liability on their products should not be compensated. Imperial tobacco should pay for all the cigarette related medical care of the customers no matter what the damage is. Whether it be a new pair of teeth or a new lung.

2)Depending on the situation, do you think that $10 billion is too much? If so, what do you think is a reasonable amount to sue for?

I think that $10 billion is too much money for anything. That's the equivalent of giving $1.43 to every person in the world. Even if the customer got cancer, $10 billion is too much to ask of anyone. A reasonable sum of money in my eyes would be, all health care payments, everything the customer bought to help with their disease, and a little bit of extra money if the judge approves. (Up to a maximum of $100,000)

3)What other large corporate companies would be sued for product liability if it wasn't in action? (Any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The decision barred P. Lorillard Co. from ““from representing by any means directly or indirectly”: That Old Gold cigarettes or the smoke therefrom contains less nicotine, or less tars and resins, or is less irritating to the throat…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homework Case

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Defendants, tobacco company, tobacco institute, tobacco research firm filed a motion before the court to dismiss the amended complaint and for reconsideration of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff injured smokers filed an action against defendants for numerous claims, including negligence, strict liability, fraud, and misrepresentation after some plaintiffs died as a result of smoking cigarettes.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are superior to other organisms due to our phenomenal ability to reason. It is foolish to believe that companies of harmful yet legal products are responsible for the problems their products cause. Irving Coffman states that it is right for tobacco companies to pay states settlements because of the “problems” tobacco causes. I disagree with Irving Coffman’s belief that it is right for tobacco companies to pay settlements to states, and I also disagree with his argument stating that other manufacturers of detrimental products such as guns and alcohol should pay similar fines.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Blowout Company

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. In your opinion, do you believe that private corporations should be held liable in US Courts for human rights abuses…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have so many things that tempt us daily and for some people tobacco is one of those things. Some people view it as a stress reliever. We have fast-food restaurants, ice-cream shops, doughnut & coffee shops, bars, liquor stores, and a lot more things that can tempt someone every single day. Just because we have things out there to tempt us, does not mean that we have to buy the product. Now we all know that tobacco is very detrimental to one’s health. However, at least R.J. Reynolds really takes pride in their products and they make sure they do everything in their power to follow regulations, policies, and procedures. “In June 2009, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began regulating cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products.” We are all aware of the risks of smoking and sometimes unfortunately, things will happen to…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edna Hacker Analysis

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edna Hacker’s statement that “no company should be made to pay for misuse of their products.” was wrong because she is comparing the use of tobacco and the use of other products such as cell phones and automobiles. Tobacco use and cell phone use, for example, are two different things that do not have any relationship with each other. Tobacco does not provide people with any benefits, using any kind of tobacco products lead numerous of health problem, and using tobacco can lead to addiction.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jeffrey Wigand

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: http://voices.yahoo.com/a-short-biography-jeffery-wigand-8489.html?cat=4. “Public Health Hero or Tobacco Industry Traitor?” October 2005. Cheri Esperon. February 14, 2012.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nightshade Research Paper

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My grandparents on both sides, and my parents have all worked at Philip Morris. Many of the luxuries I enjoy today inadvertently came from the tobacco industry. This has put me at a personal crossroads when it comes to using tobacco products. A part of me knows that tobacco is not good for your health and can cause serious health problems, but another part of me recognizes and respects…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    says “51 out of 4000 chemicals” are something that causes cancer or known to be “Carcinogenic.” However, smoking cigarette is not only causing cancer but also other serious disease such as “increasing the risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, lung disease by 2-4 times” and “diabetes, affect men’s sperm, and are dangerous for pregnant women.” According to World Health Organization, tobacco use kills about “six millions people per year,” which more than “five millions people” die from consuming cigarette directly while more than “600.000 people die as second-hand smoking.” Just in 20th century, tobacco has killed approximately “100 million people” and if it continues, tobacco will cause “1 billion deaths in 21st century”…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health insurance companies usually (though not always) lose money when people get extremely ill and rack up high medical bills, so it is certainly understandable that they are now addressing the effects smoking has on their bottom line. Many now offer smoking cessation treatment coverage,…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many citizens attempt to discover the reason for the obesity pandemic occurring across the world, however few understand the true cause. Media attempts to portray the simpler cause of inadequate energy balance, consuming the proper amount of calories to energy expenditure. Conversely, the quality of the calories consumed drastically alters the end result. For example, consuming excess sugar with limited fiber leads to the creation of fat. The directors of Fed Up raise awareness of the many other issues contributing to the extreme weight gain among individuals.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tobacco Act Research Paper

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tobacco laws have started as early as the 1970s (ACOSH, 2010). Government has implanted laws, such that of the Tobacco Act (1987), which goals are to discourage the smoking of tobacco, encouraging non-smokers; in particular young people to not start smoking, to limit the exposure of children and young people to the persuasion of smoking, to encourage and assists smokers to give up smoking, and finally the promotion of good well being and illness prevention. The tobacco act of 1897, had over the years since, been reformed, and it seems like there is no stopping now. To further reinforce its initial goal, recently the Australian government reformed this Tobacco Act. The Australian government had announced, the 25% increase in tobacco tax, plain…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a nation, we agree that individuals should be accountable for their actions. People often argue that those who are reckless with their bodies by ingesting chemicals via cigarettes or drug use and who subsequently develop cancers shouldn’t be subsidized by others’ insurance premiums as the latter group works hard at staying healthy by exercising, maintaining a healthy weight, and eating generous portions of fruits and vegetables. Somehow it isn’t fair. Unfortunately, life and good health aren’t quite that easy or predictable.…

    • 3162 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco companies plainly say that if people smoke, there may be a chance they can contract certain diseases and cancers(SHORT). A fact that few people know is that only 10% of lifelong tobacco users get cancer from smoking tobacco, but this does not mean they will not get any disease from using tobacco(LONG). Some people believe that cigars and chewing tobacco are safe alternatives to smoking cigarettes, but these types of tobacco are just as dangerous for them. Tobacco companies even have the warnings on these types of tobacco that they are not safe alternatives. It is not right for smokers to make the choice of potentially getting a disease by using a product that always has a label that warns them about diseases they might receive, and then turn around and try to hold the company making the company and product liable for them getting the disease. (LONG)“Smoking is a risky activity, not necessarily a deadly one. And adults in a free society have the right to engage in risky activities if they so choose” (Torr…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    macc

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Generally, tobacco industries are enforced regulatory control by imposing taxes and duty charges. Also restrictions on marketing, advertisement, and exhibition of the product, avoid descriptions like, light and mild, nicotine, carbon monoxide smoke yields and tobacco ingredients, prohibition of smoking in public places - BAT is aware of these aspects and employ lawyers to have legal advice on these social responsibilities, marketing and stakeholders issues.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays