Preview

Impact of the Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Impact of the Constitution
Mary Hunsucker
October 1, 2008
APUSH—3A
Take Home Essay Test

Impact of the Constitution

The Articles of Confederation were approved by all the early American states in 1781, but by 1787, it was apparent that the Articles were insufficient for the young nation to operate on. A convention was formed with the priority job being to revise the Articles of Confederation; however, they only concluded that an entire new structure was needed to fulfill the demands of the growing country. The Constitution was then born. The Constitution provided the structure of government and power that was needed to achieve a strong union. This structure “saved” the American republic from collapse while under the Articles of Confederation. George Washington himself called the end of the Articles a “happy termination” (Document A). He commended Henry Knox and hoped that good would come from the Constitution that was now put in place. Good has most definitely come from the Constitution. Would America be the great nation it is today without the formation of the Constitution? Many historians would agree that America would not be the same country in any shape, form, or fashion without the development of the Constitution. While in deliberation over the revision of the Articles of Confederation and a new government, the so-called Framers had four main points in mind. The government must be able to prevent a tyranny of the majority, prevent a tyranny of the minority, have sufficient powers to create conditions for both short- and long-term economic development, and formulate and conduct a more effective foreign policy. It was not long, however, before core conflicts emerged between different interest groups. Bankers and debtors disagreed; there was economic competition between states, along with conflicts over western land ownership. Despite the enormous gap between advocates of the differing approaches, a number of important compromises were worked out.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aoc vs the Constitution

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781. The goal of the Articles was to balance the need for national coordination of the War of Independence with the fear that centralized political power was a threat to liberty of the people. The Articles stated that the new national government was to be a "perpetual union." The Articles gave the thirteen states their individual "sovereignty, freedom and independence." Under the Articles the national government had a one house Congress, where each state cast one vote. There was no president and no judiciary. Major decisions needed the approval of nine states to be passed. There were only a few powers given to the national government which were to declare war, conduct foreign affairs, and make treaties with other governments. Congress did not have financial resources. It did not have the power to levy taxes or to regulate commerce. Revenue came from contributions from the states and in order to amend an Article you needed a unanimous decision from the states. This made it hard to amend or to change anything. The Articles basically made it impossible to have a national government on a large scale.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political, social and economic relationships for the American people were created after the American Revolution. Many types of relationships were formed when the Articles of Confederation were composed, which lead to other events. The Articles of Confederation were written to establish a government. Much of the power was in the state government’s hands. Therefore, the central government had limited power and was weaker, as most people wanted. Though it caused many economical issues. An effect of the failed Articles of Confederation was a consideration of the Articles. Delegates meeting at the Constitutional Convention agreed that they needed not to revise the Articles of Confederation, ut to start over from scratch. Then the Constitution was…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of early America had many faults and strengths after becoming free from England. They wanted to create a government different from England’s so the Americans could have more rights. To do this, the articles of confederation had no executive branch, congress didn’t have the power to tax directly which made it hard to support their own country, to change a law, it had to be unanimous and to pass a law 2/3 of the colonies had to agree which made it practically impossible to change or make laws and overall the country was just unbalanced. The first official form of government of America, The Articles of Confederation, was one of the disputable topics whether or not it was a good form of government. Evidence that proved the articles was an effective form of government was the spreading of land westward. On the other hand, there were many more ineffective ways the articles didn’t work, like Americas affairs with foreign countries like England and Spain and its economy.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as you might think. The Constitution gets most of its ideas from past documents. Without these other documents, we would not have the same constitution we have today. Without these documents, we would have a second Articles of Confederation. Without these documents, our country would be completely different.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation delivered the United States with an operational government from 1781 to 1789. It was a model of what a loose Confederation should be. The Articles succeeded in maintaining the union of the thirteen states as well as clearly outlining the general powers of the centralized government. Yet, despite these positive deeds, there were many setbacks. One major setback was the weak government designed to prevent any future abuse of power. However, with all things that have come into play, good or bad, the Constitution that now shapes America would have never been formed without first evolving from the flawed Articles of Confederation. (Magleby)…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation caused many problems for our founding fathers. There were many important factors that were abandoned in order to run a functional nation. Some of the problems were: no federal army, no national currency, the federal government could not tax, there were no centralized courts for interstate crimes, and it was extremely difficult to pass a law and almost impossible to pass an amendment. Lucky for us our founding fathers met in Philadelphia and discussed how they can approve on the Confederation. Eventually they came up with the Constitution of Independence and the Bill of Rights. Before the Constitution was created there was a lot of arguing and compromising done. Without compromise it would be impossible to create the Constitution.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, from 1781 to 1789, provided the virgin country with an efficient form government, transferring power from a monarchy to a democratic republic. However, The Articles of Confederation failed to secure our country. It left our nation utterly defenseless and divided without the existence of a standing national army and grievances among states. The reason for such a short period between its adoption and its revision was due to the many problems that occurred.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after the American Revolution was over, the United States of America was conceptualized, and from there emerged two possible forms of ruling. The government in the colonies set out to create the Articles of Confederation to prevent tyranny and be as traditional as possible. The Articles of Confederation gave the US government very little power over basic things such as taxation and raising an army. The Constitution was able to create a strong central government that united the country, and it is seen as a stepping stone to the eventual US Constitution since it wasn’t perfect.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Articles of Confederation established the first governmental structure unifying the thirteen colonies and went into effect on March 1, 1781. Its purpose was to create a confederation of states where each state could maintain its personal freedom, independence and every power. While this document was effective in many aspects it did have its pitfalls and it was these pitfalls that lead to the Articles of Confederation's replacement by the Constitution on March 4th, 1789. James Madison, a federalist, expressed the importance of this reform by saying that the best the country could do at that point in time would be to avoid the errors suggested by the past experience of other countries and the errors from their own(document 10). The concerns regarding the Articles of confederation were extensive and the compromises that the Constitution then provided in return were even more so.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were developed in 1781 and were established as a first constitution of United States of America. Under these articles, the states remained self-governed and independent. Congress only stepped in as the last resort on appeal…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although this major weakness was one of the Articles’ significant flaws, the Articles of Confederation managed to improve representation in the government of today. In the modern government, the House of Representatives allows the population of our nation to be represented, which expands the ‘One Man, One Vote’ principle. The Articles influenced the many improvements of our government throughout history. Without the principles applied, our government would not be what it is…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Constitution devotes the national domain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare and to liberty" (Maier 154). This quote, stated by William Henry Seward, displays the strength and stability that the Constitution had over the nation, and the liberty and justice it supplied for all of its citizens. Although the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have similarities, they have many differences, which proved that the Articles of Confederation were a weaker document in comparison. It can be said that the Articles were the "rough draft" to the final living document, which significantly influenced and "ruled" our government, as it still does today.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the revolution the Articles of Confederation was drafted by the Continental Congress in 1777 as the first national constitution. There was no army because the articles did not allow the federal government to apply taxes to raise an army. There was no national executive which meant there was no executive power. There was also no federal court system. An agreed vote of the states, acting through their legislatures, was vital to amend the Articles which essentially meant that changes in the articles were possible. As shown, there are many weaknesses in the articles of confederation but only three will be discussed throughout this paper. Not having separation of powers with a unicameral legislature under the articles is the first weakness I will examine. The second weakness in the articles of confederation discussed will be the fact that congress did not have the power to tax which meant that they could never put their finances in order. Lastly, for any laws to pass they had to be approved by nine or the thirteen states which was very difficult. (ranford.edu)…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government;” a bold statement considering the fact that the Articles lasted only 8 years. Although, I suppose the case could be made that the Articles of Confederation provided the means for a temporary government, only acting as a first-time attempt for the colonies in creating a more perfect representation for the colonies as a whole. This is true in some ways and in some ways it’s not; for instance, just the fact that the Articles lacked the necessary provisions for a sufficiently effective government. There was no president or executive agencies or judiciary, nor was there a tax base…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays