Impact of Power Distance: Comparison Among Multi National Companies

Topics: Decision making, Decision theory, Decision making software Pages: 24 (8465 words) Published: October 19, 2012
Running Head: IMPACT OF POWER DISTANCE

Impact of Power Distance:
Comparison among Multi-National Companies
Febian
Western Kentucky University

GRST597
Nevil C. Speer, PhD, MBA
May 8, 2009
Table of content
I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 3 II. Impact of power distance toward facework strategies………………………………..7 a) The correlation between power distance and Organizational changes…………..10 b) The correlation between power distance and injustice…………………………. 11 c) The correlation between power distance and individualism/collectivism……….13 d) The correlation between power distance and self-management…………………16 III. Impact of power distance toward decision making………………………………….16 a) Face-to-face participative decision-making……………………………………..19 b) Collective participative decision-making………………………………….…….20 c) Paternalistic participative decision-making……………………………………..22 d) Pseudo participative decision-making…………………………………………...23 IV. Impact of power distance toward effective leadership……………………………....24 V. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...27 VI. References…………………………………………………………………………...30

Introduction
Imagine a convenient 21st century office place with a high salary, a cozy chair and working desk, the latest office computer with all high technology systems. Everything you could ask for except nice subordinates who are willing to co-operate with you and a boss who is willing to treat you equally because you do not know and understand how to deal with the culture beyond this situation. I believe that this situation would probably happen to many employees in the world. This is the situation for Brianna Loftus who works for a multinational company Tetra Pack, who just got promoted but has to move to another country whose culture is totally different from hers. A little story about this company, Tetra Pak founded in 1951 is a multinational food processing and packaging company of Swedish origin with over 150 branch offices across the globe. Tetra Pack should know how to manage and develop its management and also how to treat its employee depending on where the office is located. It is because management cannot be separated from national culture. What happened to Briana could happen to employees in other multi-national companies in the world. According to Hofstede (1983) there are three reasons caused why nationality is important to management. The first reason is political because Nations are political units, rooted in history, with their own institution: forms of governments, legal system, labor and employer’s association system. The second reason why nationality is important for management is sociology because nationality has a symbolic value to citizens. And, the last reason why nationality is important for management is psychological because thinking is partly conditioned be national culture factors. Therefore, there is a relationship between management and national culture and it has become clear that national and even regional cultures do matter for management. The convergence of those factors defines, as outlines by Hofstede (1983; 2001), the concept of power distance: The relationship between superior and a subordinate in a hierarchy, including its values component, a measure of the interpersonal power or influence between the superiors and their subordinates as perceived by the less powerful of the two, subordinates. In an organization, the level of power distance is related to the degree of centralization of authority and the degree of authority leadership. This relationship shows that centralization and autocratic leadership are rooted in the mental programming of the member of a society, not only of those in power but also of those at the bottom of the power hierarchy. Hofstede (1983) explains that some countries...


References: Adler, N. J. (1997). International dimensions of organizational behavior (3rd ed,). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
Cangemi, J. (2007) Characteristic of effective leadership. Professional Counseling Diplomate, 34-35.
Fry, E. (1991). Subtlety and the art of Japanese management. Business Credit, 93, 26-28.
Furnham, A. (1993). Just world beliefs in twelve societies. Journal of Social Psycology, 133, 317-329.
George, M. J. (2000). Emotional and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Realtions, 53, 1027-1055.
Gray, R. J. (1999). Organizational climate and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 103-109.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and effective communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 348-400.
Hofstede, G (1980a). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G (1980b). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? AMACOM, a division of American Management Associations. 42-63.
Hofstede, G (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practice and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 75-89.
Hofstede, G (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heller, F. A., Pusic, E., Strauss, G. & Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational participation: Myth and reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heuer, M., Cummings, J. L., & Hutabarat, W. (1999). Cultural stability or change amomg managers in Indonesia. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 599-610.
Hyman, J., & Mason, B. (1995). Managing employee involvement and participation. London: Sage.
Iwao, S. & Triandis, H. C. (1993). Validity of auto and hetero stereotypes among Japanese and American student. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psycology, 24, 428-444.
Kanungo, R. N. & Mendonca, M. (1994). Organizational behavior. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Kirkman, B., L., & Shapiro, D. L., (1997). The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to terms: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 22, 730-757.
Lansbury, R. D. & Davis, E. M. (1992). Employee participation: Some Australian cases. International Labor Review, 131, 231-248.
Matsumoto, D. (1991). Cultural influences on the facial expressions of emotion. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 128-137.
Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Cultural influences on the perception of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 56, 92-105.
Merritt, A. C., & Helmreich, R. L. (1996). Human factors on the flight deck. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psycology, 27, 5-24.
Merkin, R. S. (2006). Power distance and facework strategies. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35, 139-160.
Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Matsumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., & Wilcox, R. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United states. Communication Monographs, 68, 235-258.
Roseman, I. J., Dhawan, N., Retteck, S., & Naidu, R. K. (1995). Cultural differences and cross-cultural similarities in appraisals and emotion responses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psycology, 26, 23-48.
Sagie, A., and Aycan, Z. (2003) A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations. Human Relations, 56, 453-473.
Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M. (2000). Participation and empowerment in organization: Modeling, effectiveness, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Silversthorne, C. (2004) The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 592-598.
Summers, D. C. S. (2009). Quality management: Creating and sustaining organizational effectiveness. (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sull, D (1999). Why good companies go bad. Harvard Business Review, 77, 42-51.
Triandis, H. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.
Vittel, S. J., Nwachukwu, S. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1993). The effects of cultural on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 753-760.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Power distance Essay
  • Power Distance in Companies Essay
  • Power Distance Research Paper
  • Essay on Workplace Bullying and Power Distance
  • Impact of Power on Leadership Effectiveness Essay
  • Multi National Corporations Essay
  • Culture-Power Distance Research Paper
  • Power Distance and Hofstede's Dimensions Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free