Impact of Foreign Direct Investment

Topics: Economics, International trade, Economic growth Pages: 17 (4197 words) Published: January 5, 2011
Qual Quant (2011) 45:223–231 DOI 10.1007/s11135-009-9272-5 RESEARCH NOTE

Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in pakistan and turkey: an investigation using bounds test Mushtaq Ahmad Klasra

Published online: 4 September 2009 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Abstract In the literature empirical evidences regarding export-led growth (ELG), FDIled exports, and growth-driven exports (GDE) hypotheses have been mixed and inconclusive. This paper uses the autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) model (Pesaran and Shin, Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, 1990) and tests the existence of long run equilibrium relationship between the determinants of growth during the period 1975–2004 for Pakistan and Turkey. The results indicate that in the short run there is bi-directional causal relationship between trade openness and exports for Pakistan and FDI and exports relationship for Turkey. The long run relationship results support the growth-driven exports hypothesis for Turkey and openness-growth nexus in Pakistan. Keywords Economic growth · Foreign direct investment · Autoregressive distributed lags model (ARDL) · Causality · Pakistan and Turkey

1 Introduction Perhaps the main critical issue that mostly occupies the minds of policy makers is ‘how the economic growth of a country could be accelerated?’ In other words, what are the factors that affect economic performance of a country? The answer to this question remained uncertain. To some, it is the export-promoting strategy, others name FDI-friendly strategy as a main contributor to economic growth, and to others it is the extent of trade openness of a country that matters for economic growth. There appears no consensus among researchers in the literature on this issue. Their views remain mixed and inconclusive. Quite a large number of economists broadly agree that FDI plays a major role in the development process of a country. They argue that FDI affects economic growth through various venues like, increasing capital formation, advanced technology and know-how, employment

M. A. Klasra (B ) Institute of Management Sciences (IMS), Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan e-mail: mklasra@gmail.com

123

224

M. A. Klasra

and possible spillovers effects on the local firms. Many studies tried to quantify its contribution to economic growth and came up with mixed results. For example Borensztein et al. (1998), De Mello (1999) and Obwona (2001), while exploring the relationship between FDI and economic growth confirmed the FDI-led growth hypothesis. But some studies like, Zhang (2001), Balasubramanyam et al. (1999) and Woo (1995), though, found FDI beneficial for economic growth but concluded that its benefits are not automatic rather are contingent upon certain characteristics of the host country. The nature of association between exports and economic growth also remained widely debated among researchers in the recent past. Researchers remain divided on the question whether economic performance is export-led or growth driven? For example Gkatak et al. (1997) for Malaysia, Dhawan and Biswal (1999) for India supported the export-led growth (ELG) hypothesis. This hypothesis maintains that the economies exporting a major share of their outputs appear to grow faster than other. The growth of exports, in fact, is seen as a stimulating factor across the country and causes economic growth to increase as economy becomes open to international trade. There are, however, some studies that maintain that it is the growth of GDP that leads to corresponding expansion of trade. This growth-driven export (GDE) hypothesis is advocated by Bhagwati (1988), Findlay (1984), Vernon (1996) and Segerstrom et al. (1990). They base their assertion on neoclassical trade theory, which typically stresses the causality that runs from home-factor endowments and productivity to the supply of exports.1...

References: Ahmed, N.: Export response to trade liberalization in Bangladesh: a cointegration analysis. Appl. Econ. 32, 1077–1084 (2002) Arslan, I., Wijnbergen, S.V.: Export incentives, exchange rate policy and export growth in Turkey. Rev. Econ. Stat. 75(1), 128–133 (1993) Balasubramanyam, V.N., Salisu, M., Sapsford, D.: Foreign direct investment as an engine of growth. J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev. 8(1), 27–40 (1999) Bhagwati, J.: Anatomy and consequences of exchange control regimes. Ballinger for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (1978) Bhagwati, J.: Protectionism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1988) Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., Lee, J.W.: How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth. J.Int. Econ. 45, 115–135 (1998) De Mello, L.: Foreign direct investment led growth: evidence from time series and panel data. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 51, 133–151 (1999) Dhawan, U., Biswal, B.: Re-examining export led growth hypothesis: a multivariate cointegration analysis for India. Appl. Econ. 31, 525–530 (1999) Dickey, D., Fuller, W.: Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427–431 (1979) Edwards, S.: Openness, trade liberalization and growth in developing countries. J. Econ. Lit. 31, 1358– 1393 (1993) Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J.: Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometric A 55, 251–276 (1987) Findlay, R. Growth and development in trade models. In: Jonesn, R., Kenen, P. (eds.) Handbook of International : Economics, vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984) Gkatak, S., Milner, C., Utkulu, U.: Exports, export composition and growth: cointegration and causality evidence for Malaysia. Appl. Econ. 29, 213–223 (1997) Government of Turkey: The impact of globalization on Turkish economy. Central bank of the republic of Turkey, Ankara (2002) Greenaway, D., Sapsfor, D.: What does liberalization do for exports and growth. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 130(1), 152–174 (1994) Greenaway, W., Morgan, D., Wright, P.: Trade liberalization and growth in developing countries. J. Dev. Econ. 676, 229–244 (2002) Harrison, A.: Openness and growth: a time series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. J. Dev. Econ. 48, 419–447 (1996) IMF: International Financial Statistics CD-ROM. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C. (2002) Ingco, M., Winter, A.: Pakistan and Uruguay round: impact and opportunities; a quantitative assessment South Asia region. Internal discussion paper, No. IDP-163, Washington, DC. The World Bank (1996) Jenkins, R.: Trade Liberalization and export performance in Bolivia. Dev. Change 27(4), 693–716 (1996) Johansen, S.: Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12, 231–254 (1988) Joshi, V., Little, I.M.D.: India’s Economic Reforms 1991–2001. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996) Krueger, A.O.: Trade policy and economic development: how we learn. Am. Econ. Rev. 87(1), 1–22 (1997) Mackinnon, J.G.: Critical values for cointegration tests in long-run econometric relationships. In: Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. (eds.) Readings in Cointegration, pp. 226–276. Oxford University Press, New York (1999) Michael, M., Papageorgiou, D., Choksi, A.M. (eds.): Liberalizing Foreign Trade: Lessons of Experience in the Developing World. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1991) Obwona, M.: Determinants of FDI and their impacts on economic growth in Uganda. Afr. Dev. Rev. 13, 46– 81 (2001) Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y.: An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Storm, S. (ed.) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999) Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.: Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econ. 16, 289–326 (2001)
123
Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in pakistan and turkey
231
Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D.: Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. In: Bernanke, B., Rogoff, K. (eds.) NBER Macroeconomic Annual 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge (2001) Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., Dinopoulos, E.: A Shumpeterian model of the product life cycle. Am. Econ. Rev. 80, 1077–1091 (1990) Vernon, R.: International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 80, 190–207 (1996) Woo, W.T. Comments on Wei’s paper foreign direct investment in China: source and consequences. In: Krue: ger, A. (ed.) Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia, pp. 166–189. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995) World Trade Organization: Trade policy review—Pakistan (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/ tp187_e.htm)(2002) Zhang, K.H.: Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemp. Econ. Policy 19, 175–185 (2001)
123
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Foreign Direct Investment Essay
  • Foreign Direct Investments Essay
  • Foreign Direct Investment in Ireland: Essay
  • Foreign direct investment Colombia Essay
  • Essay on Foreign Direct Investment in Kenya
  • Foreign Direct Investment Essay
  • Foreign Direct Investment Essay
  • Essay on Theories of Foreign Direct Investment

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free