Preview

Impact of Dividend Policy on Companies’ Performance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Impact of Dividend Policy on Companies’ Performance
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON COMPANIES’ PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC LISTED COMPANIES IN MALAYSIA

1.0

INTRODUCTION

Dividend policy is the regulations and guidelines that a company uses to decide to make dividend payments to shareholders. Dividends are payments made to stockholders from a firm's earnings, whether those earnings were generated in the current period or in previous periods. When a company makes a profit, they must decide on what to do with those profits. They could continue to retain the profits within the company, or they could pay out the profits to the owners of the firm in the form of dividends. Once the company decides on whether to pay dividends, they may establish a dividend structure, which may in turn impact on investors and perceptions of the company in the financial markets which bring impact on the firm’s value. Several dividend policy issues arose on how dividend policy affects the value of the business whereas there are five explanations for paying dividends developed by researchers, those includes Signaling Effect of Dividend, Clientele Effect, Bird-in-theHand Theory, Tax Preference, and Flotation Costs. The focus of this paper is to examining the dividend policy adopted by public listed companies in Malaysia and the impact of dividend policy on companies performance. This study provides evidence that the KLSE-listed firms follow less stable dividend policies and their dividend payments are closely related to changes in earnings but they do not immediately omit dividends when earnings decrease. This paper is divided into five sections. Section two below, is a review of relevant literature. Section 3, details of data and methodology. The following section, Section 4, presents the results and analysis. The final section, Section 5 concludes and discusses some recommendations.

2.0

ORGANISATION OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW

How firms determine their dividend policy has been a puzzle to financial economists for many years. In their


References: Aliahmed H.J. (2010). BBPW3203 Financial Management II. Selangor: Open University Malaysia Baker H. Kent, Tarun K.Mukherjee and Ohannes George Paskelian (2006), “How Norwegian Managers View Dividend Policy”, Global Finance Journal, Vol. 17(1), 155-176 Bhattacharya, S. (1979), “Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and the Bird in the Hand Fallacy”, Journal of Econ., 10, 259-270 10 Black (1976) “The Dividend Puzzle”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.2, 5-8 Brav, Alon. John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, Roni Michaely (2005), “Payout Policy in the 21st Century”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 77 (3), 483 – 527. Chen, Z, Yan-Leung Cheung, Aris Stouraitis and Anita W.S. Wong (2005), “Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in HongKong”, PacificBasin Finance Journal, Vol.13(4), 431-449 Chin-Bun Tse (2005), “Use Dividends to Signal or Not: An Examination of the UK Dividend Payout Patterns.” Managerial Finance, Vol. 31(4), 12-33 Chung, K.K. And C. Charoenwong (1991), “Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks.” Financial Management, Vol. 20, 21-33 Collin, D.W., S. P. Kothari (1989), “An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-Sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, 143-181 DeAngelo, H. and DeAngelo, L., (2000), “Controlling Stockholders and the Disciplinary Role of Payout Policy: a study of the Times Mirror Company.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 56, 153-207 DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L. and Skinner, D., (1996) “Reversal of Fortune Dividend Signaling and the Disappearance of Sustained Earnings Growth” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, 341-371 Fama, E and Babiak, H. (1968) “Dividend Policy:an Empirical analysis”, American Statistical Association Journal, Vol.63, 1132-1161 Fama, E.F., French K.R. (2001) “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?” Journal Financ. Econ. Vol. 60, 3-43 Ghosh, C and D.F. Sirmans (2006), “Do Managerial Motives Impact Dividend Decisions in REITs?”, Journal of Real Estate Finance Econ, 32, 327-355 15 Grullon G. Michaely, R. and Bhaskaran Swaminathan (2002), “Are Dividends Changes a Sign of Firm Maturity?” Journal of Business, Vol.75, 387-424 Grullon, G., Michaely, R. Benartzi, S., Thaler, R.H. (2003) “Dividend Changes do not Signal Changes in Future Profitability.” Journal of Business (in press). Gugler, Klau, B. Burcin Yurtoglu (2003), “Corporate Governance and Dividend Payout Policy in Germany”, European Economic Review, Vol. 47 (4), 731 – 758. 11 Gul and Kealey (1999). “Chaebol, Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Debt and Dividend Policies of Korea Companies”. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol 13, 401-416. Healy & Palepu (1988), “Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omission.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, 149-176 Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W. H. (1986), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics Vol.3, 305-360 La Porta, R. et al. (2000), “Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 55 (1), 305-360 Lease, K. John, A.Kalay, U.Loewenstein and O.h. Sarig (2000), “ Dividend Policy: It impact on firm value.” Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Lintner, J (1956), “Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes”, America Economic Review, 46, 97-113 Miller, M.H., Modigliani, F. (1961) “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares”, Journal of Business, 34, 411-413 Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG) and University Technologi MARA (UiTM) (2006), “Dividend Scanner 2005” Short, Helen, Hao Zhang and Kevin Keasey (2002), “The Link Between Dividend Policy and Institutional Ownership” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.8, 105-122 Smith, C.W. Jr. and Ross L. Watts (1992), “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economies, Vol.32, 263-292 Stacescu, B (2006), “Dividend Policy in Switzerland”, Journal of Economic Literature, Nov, 1-44 Few S.L. et al. (2007). Dividend Policy: Evidence from Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.um.edu.my/984/1/Ling,FS_%26_Others.pdf. [2010, Nov 15] Baker H.K. and Powell G.H. (1999) Dividend policy issues in regulated and unregulated firms: a managerial perspective Volume: 25 Issue: 6 Bursa Malaysia: Annual Reports. [Online]. Available: http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/listed_companies/company_announcements/ annual_reports/index.jsp. [2010, Nov 15] 12
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17
    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    The dividend payout versus stock repurchase has changed dramatically during the past 30 years. First off the total cash distributions as a percentage of net income have remained the same fairly stable at around 26% to 28%, but the mix of dividends and repurchases has changed. The average dividend payout fell from 22.3% in 1974 to 13.8% in 1998, while the average repurchase payouts as a percentage of net income rose from 3.7% to 13.6%. Since 1985, large companies have repurchased more shares than they have issued. Ever since 1998, more cash has been returned to shareholders in repurchases then as dividend payouts. Second, companies today are less likely to pay a dividend. In 1978, about 66.5% of NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq firms paid a dividend. In 1999, only 20.8% paid a dividend. A portion of this reduction can be explained by the larger number of IPO’s in the 1990’s, since young firms rarely pay a dividend. Even though that doesn’t explain the whole story, as many mature firms now don’t pay dividends. Third is that relatively small number of older, more established, and more profitable firms accounts for most of the cash distributed as dividends and finally there is a considerable variation in distribution policies, as some companies pay a high percentage of their income as dividends and some pay none.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rosetta Stone Ipo
    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Rosetta Stone Ipo

    Denis, D.J. & Osobov, I. (2008), "Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy", journal of Financial Economics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 62-82.…

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Decision
    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Dividend Decision

    15.4 Dividend Irrelevance Theory: Miller and Modigliani Model 15.5 Stability of Dividends 15.6 Forms of Dividends 15.7 Stock Split 15.8 Summary Terminal Questions Answers to SAQs and TQs 15.1 Introduction Dividends are that portion of a firm’s net earnings paid to the shareholders. Preference shareholders are entitled to a fixed rate of dividend irrespective of the firm’s earnings. Equity holders’ dividends fluctuate year after year. It depends on what portion of earnings is to be retained by the firm and what portion is to be paid off. As dividends are distributed out of net profits, the firm’s decisions on retained earnings have a bearing on the amount to be distributed. Retained earnings constitute an important source of financing investment requirements of a firm. However, such opportunities should have enough growth potential and sufficient profitability. There is an inverse relationship between these two – larger retentions, lesser dividends and vice versa. Thus two constituents of net profits are always competitive and conflicting. Dividend policy has a direct influence on the two components of shareholders’ return – dividends and capital gains. A low payout and high retention may have the effect of accelerating earnings growth. Investors of growth companies realize their money in the form of capital gains. Dividend yield will be low for such companies. The influence of dividend policy on future capital gains is to happen in…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary of Forecasting Profitability and Earnings
    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary of Forecasting Profitability and Earnings

    Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F. 1961. Dividend Policy Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business 34 (October): 411–33.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case
    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Eagles Electronics Case

    Fama, F. & French, R. (2001) Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics, Journal of financial economics, 60, pp. 3-44.…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Managerial Finance Paper
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Managerial Finance Paper

    The objective of this term paper is to find out the dividend policies (2005-2009) followed by these companies and also to analyze their capital structure.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Georgia Atlantic Company
    • 4286 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Georgia Atlantic Company

    The purpose of this case is to have students examine dividend policy--cash dividends, stock splits, and stock dividends--from the viewpoint of its effect on corporate share prices.…

    • 4286 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Determinates of Dividend Policy Apple

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Determinates of Dividend Policy Apple

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Emi Group Case Study
    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Emi Group Case Study

    While conducting the analysis of EMI group’s dividend policy, one factor that stood out to us was the clientele effect. The clientele effect shows us who holds most of our outstanding shares. High tax-bracket individuals would prefer zero-to-low dividend payout to save on taxes. Low tax-bracket individuals would prefer a low-to-medium dividend payout, which gives them additional income while helping them save on taxes. An investing corporation would prefer a higher dividend payout because if they own a significant amount of shares, say 1 million, the income stream from that dividend would provide the company with more monetary resources while benefitting from tax exemptions. So before setting a dividend policy for EMI group, we must first determine who holds that majority of our shares and how many shares they hold. We found that 83% of EMI’s investor base is occupied by groups or institutions that own 1,000,000 shares or more. All of the significant shareholders are large corporations, who not only prefer, but demand a high dividend yield or payout. Only 0.2% of EMI’s shareholders are individual investors who own 500 shares or less. The payment of an 8p per share dividend is a significant amount for those larger investors who own 1 million+ shares. While to the smaller investors, who own less than 500 shares, a dividend of 8p per share doesn’t seem like much. So, not paying the scheduled dividend would significantly affect those larger investors who were expecting to see a high additional income figure from the dividend payment. Therefore, these large investors would begin to unload the EMI stock from their portfolios, which would be reflected in the decline of EMI’s stock price.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Law, Ownership, Corporate Governance , and Dividend Payout Policy: Evidence from 33 Countries
    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Law, Ownership, Corporate Governance , and Dividend Payout Policy: Evidence from 33 Countries

    Miller and Modigiliani (1961) prove that dividend policy is irrelevant to share value in perfect and efficient capital markets. In this setup, no rational investor has a preference between dividends and capital gains. However, dividend payout policy is still discussed extensively until now. In this proposal, I use a sample of companies from 33 countries around the world to shed light on the relationship among legal origin, insider holdings, corporate governance, and dividend payout policy. This idea mainly comes from Professor Shiu in corporate finance class at NCU.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    dividend policy on share holders..
    • 4845 Words
    • 44 Pages

    dividend policy on share holders..

    Baker HK, Powell GE (1999). How corporate managers view dividend policy. Q. J. Bus. Econ., 38 (spring): 1726.…

    • 4845 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Distributions to Shareholders:
    • 5694 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Distributions to Shareholders:

    The information content of dividends is a theory which holds that investors regard dividend changes as “signals” of management forecasts.…

    • 5694 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Influence of Agency Costs on Dividend Policy - Research Proposal
    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Influence of Agency Costs on Dividend Policy - Research Proposal

    1. INTRODUC TION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. B rief Objectives .................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Brief Liter ature Rev iew ........................................................................................... 4 3.1 Cornerstones of dividend policy ................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Equity Agency Cost Theory........................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Remedies to Agency Conflicts and their Costs ........................................................................... 5 3.4 Jensen’s Free Cash Flow Hypothesis .......................................................................................... 6 3.4 Using the Tobin’s Q .................................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Further Studies ............................................................................................................................ 7 4.0 Research M ethodo logy ............................................................................................. 7 4.1 Data Collection Methods ............................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Sources of Data ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Sample......................................................................................................................................... 8 4.4 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.5 Use of Models…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do Firms Pay Dividends? International Evidence on the Determinants of Dividend Policy*
    • 15700 Words
    • 63 Pages

    Why Do Firms Pay Dividends? International Evidence on the Determinants of Dividend Policy*

    Abstract In the U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, France, and Japan, the propensity to pay dividends is higher among larger, more profitable firms, and those for which retained earnings comprise a large fraction of total equity. Although there are hints of reductions in the propensity to pay dividends in most of the sample countries over the 1994 to 2002 period, they are driven by a failure of newly listed firms to initiate dividends when expected to do so. Dividend abandonment and the failure to initiate by existing nonpayers are economically unimportant except in Japan. Moreover, in each country, aggregate dividends have not declined and are concentrated among the largest, most profitable firms. Finally, outside of the U.S. there is little evidence of a systematic positive relation between relative prices of dividend paying and non-paying firms and the propensity to pay dividends. Overall, these findings cast doubt on signaling, clientele, and catering explanations for dividends, but support agency cost-based lifecycle theories.…

    • 15700 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy as a Strategic Tool for Wealth Maximization
    • 12343 Words
    • 50 Pages

    Dividend Policy as a Strategic Tool for Wealth Maximization

    Rey holds (2001) noted that despite the common assertion that higher wealth gains to shareholders. Would result from the use of repurchases instead of dividends, firms continue to increases the size of dividends annually and not increases repurchase at an even faster rate. This indicates that dividend remain a mystery.…

    • 12343 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics