Preview

Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory Paper
Immanuel Kant explores the morals of an action based on the action’s fidelity to rules or regulations, each person has dignity as well as the ability to reason. Kant disagrees with the utilitarian principle; he believes that you shouldn’t make decisions based on pleasure. “Kant’s moral theory is based on his view of the human being as having the unique capacity for rationality. No other animal possesses such a propensity for reasoned thought and action, and it is exactly this ability that requires human beings to act in accordance with and for the sake of moral law or duty” (Shakil, 2013). For example, the donor-child’s mother may a sense of duty to protect the child from the donor-father, yet the consequence of that decision is the child learning about this information and then later feel betrayed or feel a sense of loss. This theory applies to egg and sperm donation because in some people criticizes those who donate their future children, and those who are “inseminated” with other peoples children. Most believe that God gave you what was intended for you. According to Hamilton (2013), it is …show more content…
Utilitarianism consists of whether actions are morally right or morally wrong based on the effects of the actions consequences. When deciding if an action is morally right one must identify what type of action is being performed, and determine what benefits and harm will result from the course of action as well as how will it affect everyone that is involved. “Utilitarian’s believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things (such as pleasure and happiness) in the world and decreasing the amount of bad things (such as pain and unhappiness). Utilitarian’s think that what makes a morality be true or justifiable is its positive contribution to human (and perhaps non-human) beings.” (Santa Clara University,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both utilitarianism and moral theory share the idea what ought to be done. Their differences is how they are perceived. Utilitarianism is perceived moral from the consequences of the action, or the outcome. Kant’s moral theory is perceived moral from the motive behind the action, or the why. As shown, both theories share likes and…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His decision falls within the criticism that utilitarianism has. By not giving his kidney to his daughter, it could seem as though he’s taking her rights away of living a better life to benefit more people in the long run. It seems as though the father is keeping in mind the rest of the family. It could be probable that his fear of the surgery, affected his thinking that something may happen to kip while in surgery. He could keep in mind if something happens to him it could be a detrimental situation for the family including his daughter. By not going into surgery, he is benefiting the rest of the…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism ethics theory suggest that an action is morally correct when it maximizes the total utility to produce more good than bad, or more happiness than suffering. Utilitarianism does not relate to morality nor ethics because these are actions are taken in order for the most usefulness, no matter the outcome or end result. Also if we do not know the end result of something we cannot determine if it is ethical or not.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, utilitarianism allows for the good of all. Mills wrote, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Because morality is based on the greatest pleasure the more people who benefit from an act, the more…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of utilitarianism is that the morally good thing to do is to pleasure the greatest number of people or animals for the least amount of suffering. For example you can rationalize killing a mass murderer before he kills even more people. Therefore taking the life of one person to save the life of many more.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Intro Paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the approach to ethics that focus on choosing the act that has the best consequences (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). The utilitarian will view all the good and bad produced by the act (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarian’s do not view the difference in chosen act based as moral issues. Acts are classified as morally right or wrong only if the action has consequences that have a result that has a preferred manner (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Utilitarianism focuses on the act on the individual performing the action. Utilitarianism only addresses morality if the act is the preferred action but if not, morality does not play a role in basing decisions (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). Ethics is not viewed in utilitarianism as well because decisions are based on best outcome for the individual.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Procreative Beneficence

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The advances of Reproductive Assistance Technologies (ARTs), such as In vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) have established a broad platform for debate, which until recently has focused mostly on the moral permissibility of using these technologies for the detection of non-disease genes, those which cause a physical or psychological state not associated with disease, such as sex and tissue type (Stoller 2008, 364). However, in his article “Procreative Beneficence: Why we should select the best children” Savulescu widened the scope of this debate, arguing that the use of PGD in this manner is not only morally acceptable but a moral obligation for prospective parents. He contends that all genetic information, both disease and non-disease, should be utilised to ensure prospective parents have the best child that it is possible for them to have. This essay argues that Savulescu is incorrect in his assertion that prospective parents should have the best child it is possible for them to have and his Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB) should therefore be rejected for a number of reasons. Firstly, the principle indirectly, yet unavoidably, impacts on various aspects of the reproductive autonomy of prospective parents and is therefore immoral in what it advocates. Secondly, since PPB has its theoretical foundation in the notion of impersonal harm (Bennett 2009, 266), and requires parents to become complacent with oppression of minority groups, it unavoidably parallels the motives of the “old” eugenics of the 1930’s (Sparrow 2007, 51). Finally, Savulescu not only over exaggerates the moral obligation parents have toward their children in his account of PPB, but also fails to adequately prove that his believed moral obligation truly exists, and thus his argument loses its credibility with prospective parents.…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism in its simplest form distinguishes the difference between right and wrong by asserting that what is right is any action of good that will positively affect the common welfare of all. In short, the principle of utility implies that what is good is whatever promotes the greatest amount of happiness. This implies that the happiness of one individual is not as relevant or important as the happiness of a multitude of persons, or that the value of life can be measured in numbers and not by specific individuals. The general idea is that if five people are saved as compared to saving one life, then there is more happiness being created and as a result more good is being created.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant, one of the most significant and popular theorists, was also one of the last key philosophers of the Enlightenment period. Existing ethical assumptions are being deduced using this ethical theory of duty, which argues that the when an action can be supported and willed by practical reason and universal law, it is the right action. Kant did not believe that just mere virtues can measure ethics. Looking at Kant’s general criticisms of previous ethical theories, his definitions of autonomy and heteronomy, his formulation of categorical imperative principle and the relationship between categorical imperative and autonomous ethical choice, the argument is that there is not one theory of ethics that could summarize man’s power to decide what’s good and bad.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth-century German philosopher. Essentially Kant’s most important principles for being ethical are good will and moral laws. According to Kant, a person who has the tenacity of good will influenced by moral values and act in accordance with this rather than their own desires is considered a person of goodwill. Consequently, Kant’s moral theory is deontology, which entails acting out of duty rather than inclination or desirability of idiosyncratic interests. In deontology, it is obligatory to follow ‘maxims’ as Kant call them, which are rules such as the law and moral laws. In Kantian ethics, this corresponds with Categorical Imperative, which is following the rule of, “Act only in accordance to that maxim through…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the ethical issue remains concerning whether a female who 's being paid for her surrogacy is exploiting infertile couples and entering the agreement for money. Others begin to see the infertile couple as exploiting the surrogate 's body and taking advantage of a female who needs money. Another issue, a couple that would adopt a child would be rigorously screened and be assessed to their suitability. This would not be the case with surrogacy. Some people who would be restricted from adopting could avoid this process by using a surrogate. One of the key issues is with regards to surrogacy is it is impossible to determine the risks involved in the surrogacy process. A surrogate needs to be informed of the potential risks to her health and the possible psychological trauma she can suffer. There should a moral requirement for all parties involved to consider the welfare of the child born into any agreement. However, surrogacy raises the debate of people’s “right” to have children. If we refuse the option of surrogacy, are we discriminating against the infertile?…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays