Preview

Immanuel Kant Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant Analysis
Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time. Kant believes that a good will is based on the attitude you have towards what you are doing; meaning that doing the right thing based on the fact that it’s the right thing to do is what makes up good will and doing what you think is good doesn’t mean that the act is actually good. This tides over …show more content…
Talking about animals and how ethics is applied to them is something that varies greatly depending on which philosopher you’re talking to. Some philosophers state that humans are superior to animals based on the fact that humans can use reason to make choices, while animals default to their instincts for their choices. This would mean that animals are merely instrumental to humans and can be used to serve the needs of humans in any way they see fit. Kant doesn’t differ much on how he thinks about animal mainly because Kant believes that good will is the only inherit good and as animals do not have good will they naturally don’t share the same values as humans, but were Kant differs is in how he thinks the treatment of animals effects humans as Kant stated, “With regard to the animate but non-rational part of creation, violent and cruel treatment of animals is far more intimately opposed to a human being’s duty to himself, and he has a duty to refrain from this; for it dulls his shared feeling of their suffering and so weakens and gradually uproots a natural predisposition that is very serviceable to morality in one’s relation with other men.” When comparing these ideas of ethics on animals with Kant’s ideas of how ethics are applied to animals we can see the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1A. According to Kant, good will is the only thing that is absolutely good without qualification. Good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good. Good will is what makes all other good things truly good. Things can be good, but not without qualification. The will is good because the intention itself is good, rather than a desired result or some outside reasoning. All in all it is the honest and unselfish intention of a will.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Kant vs Mill

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophers Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill both have different views on moral worth and Utilitarianism, which states that an action is morally right if it produces more good for all people affected or suffering from the action. Mainly, the question is how much of the morality of an action is predicted by its outcome. Both men have moral theories that differ on this topic.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Kant, the good will is the only thing that is good in itself.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I’m going to address questions concerning Kant’s grounding for the metaphysics of morals. First, I will describe each of his examples of acts done out of desire and acts done out of duty. Then I will answer the following questions: 1. What conclusion about moral worth does Kant use these examples to illustrate? 2. Whether I agree or disagree with Kant that if you perform an action out of duty, then the act has more moral worth that it would if you were to perform it out of the desire to make someone else happy—using my own example of a moral act done out of the desire to make someone else happy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy website disclosed that Immanuel Kant believed “the supreme principle of morality is a standard of rationality” […] “rationally [is a] necessary and unconditional principle that we must always follow despite any natural desires or inclinations we may have to the contrary”. To put it differently, without reason, morality is nothing and since we are human animals capable of reason, we are obligated to honor said reason. The majority of humans do acknowledge that there’s no moral difference between humans and animals, because of them both 'subjects-of-a-life’. Both plan their lives, care about the quality and length of life and both are aware that they are alive but because animals lack the capacity for free moral judgment, humans can’t confidently express that animals deserve a full ethical consideration. This is important because the value of morality depreciates when moral acts are done at the convenience of humankind.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to discover what is moral or not, Kant believes that categorical imperative gives reasoning for any sort of action. In order to do so, one must think about the fundamental rule that goes in hand with what the person plans to fulfill in the first place. If a certain act can be applied to others and puts them in that exact situation, then it is moral. One concept of categorical imperative is known as “The Principle of Ends.” This theory describes individuals as worthy and valuable, depicting them as something worth more than a mere object. This pairs with the saying “treat others as you would like to be treated.” On a general status, I believe that this should be the correct thing to do. Concerning Kant, I disagree with his argument…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good will according to Kant, is attempting to do the right thing in all situations. Kant believes that in every situation one encounters, there will always be good. I believe that although in some instances, there can be goodness; I also believe that there are certain situations in which only the bad can occur. For example, on the day of the terrorist attack on 9/11 in New York, the terrorist act was not morally correct in anyway. On his prime…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant constantly stressed that we have a sense of duty that follows a law like characteristic, and in turn we are all autonomy individuals. We as human beings are self- law giving, and constantly seek to harmonize our realm of ends. Our realm of ends allows us to follow a universal law which will lead us to bettering each other through rational actions. However, rationality is decided through our reason, and our reason is to create happiness in the end. Many businesses these days have autonomic power and some exercise these powers to reach a realm of ends, but some do not. Firms like those on Wall Street made irrational decisions through their autonomic powers, which lead our economic into…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 13, 2013, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A second person that would agree with the idea of war having a different set of rules in the sense that war is more instinctive then that of a habit is Immanuel Kant. Kant holds the idea of the categorical imperative. Categorical is the Latin root to mean without exception and imperative means what must be done. This sums up the idea of one’s duty which Kant describes that duty is something one must do without exception. This idea of duty leans towards the idea of instinct because every person in the battle field has a duty to bring each other home at whatever cost. Sometimes that means possibly risking your life for that person, but I guess if you look at from a stoic perspective and use the principle of double effect the outcome should always be…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The binding trait between Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives is the element of reason. Both reinforce Kant's opinion that people have a duty to respect rational thinking. In the first formulation, Kant instructs people to use reason for the purpose of determining if an action is moral by the standard of it being good for everyone, or if it should be applied as a universal moral law. Kant believes it is critical to determine moral laws without the consideration of the goals or outcomes…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Notes on Kant

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Morality is entirely determined by what someone wills because a good will is the only thing that is good with out provocations. Every other character trait is only morally good once we qualify it as such. Kant morality is all about what someone wills and not about the end result or consequence is. Someone can be happy but for immoral reasons. Kant it is really the thought that counts. Motivation is everything. What does Bentham and Mills look at consequences and happiness. Kant thinks of these things as matter of riddle in the game of morality. Think of it this way. If we think of someone as our favorite moral hero in past and present because of the various things they did, accomplish, brought about. All you are doing when you admire such people is judging results. What we see. But if we are really judging moral worth on what we see we are then failing to adjudicate moral worth entirely. After all we have no idea what the shop clerks real motives are. Perhaps she is honest because she thinks this is the best way to make money. If this wasn’t her true motivation she may start ripping people off as soon as she could. Think back to what glaucon says. He says it is better to appear to be moral than to really be moral. Kant believes this is a much more comman way of going aobut things that it probably happens most of the time given that many people don’t have moral motivations that we really have no way of knowing what peopole’ motivations are. Perhaps Abraham Lincoln and MLK motivations were not stemmed form good will at all but only for honor, fame or fortune. We simply don’t know. Remember there are many people who were unlucky failed to bring any results even thought they hated good will or moral principles. They are forever unknown they are forever anonymous. He says we should stick to what pure reason tells and tells us it doesn’t care about consequences, doesn’t care about actions, doesn’t care about results. It cares…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays