Preview

If You Can't Say Something Nice, Don't Say Nothing at All

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
If You Can't Say Something Nice, Don't Say Nothing at All
HannahRae Stevens
5 Oct. 2011

“If you Can’t Say Something Nice, Don’t Say Nothing At All”

In any given day, we are exposed to hundreds of opinions from various sources. An admiring comment about your shoes, a disgusted cry during a Presidential address, a whispered diss about the girl across the room at a social event. Opinions are a part of everyday life, and we often never even give much thought to whether they are a necessary and beneficial asset to society. If we were indeed to ponder this concept, we would more than likely come to find that these opinions, while completely acceptable according to our nation’s belief in the freedom of speech, are actually a detriment to society. The opinions spewed by any citizen, from the President to the milkman, are unnecessary and have a negative effect on the minds of those subject to them. Freedom of speech is a precious right that Americans have fought for, treasured, and horribly abused. Enabling a man to speak whatsoever he chooses was a risky and dangerous gamble taken by our founding fathers. Nevertheless, it accomplished great things. It gave the black man a chance to stand proudly with the white man; it gave the woman a chance to step fearlessly into a man’s position. These accomplishments are, indeed, honorable and admirable. Yet the abuses this freedom has suffered have become far too great. In today’s media, serious topics such as politics, religion, and even sexuality have become the focus of public mockery and spite. Television shows such as South Park and Family Guy take serious issues and create invidious parodies that depict what almost everyone is thinking, but barely anyone dares to say. Barely anyone dares to say it because they know that it is offensive and cruel. These pernicious opinions are the epitome of the abuse of freedom of speech. The potential to harm others with strong but misguided opinions through media is unnecessary and carries a strong negative connotation. Perhaps the most

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    By chiefly drawing on legal precedence in four court cases—Brown, Governor of California, et al. v. Entertainment Merchants Association, et al. (Brown v. EMA), Ginsberg v. New York, Case v. Unified School District, and Campbell v. St-Tammany Parish School Board—, this paper endorses the claim that all books which present controversial subject matter should have an informative label on them. Controversial subject matter is stipulated as any content that may cause emotional or mental harm on well-being of persons of any age, such topics include, but are not limited to: any historical contexts that deal with cruel and inhuman social and political conditions (for example, Nazi Germany, or slavery in the United-States), homophobia and transphobia,…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is one of the only country’s on earth that has the right for freedom of press enshrined in its constitution (U.S. Const. amend. I). If you take a second to stop and think about that, we are one of the only countries who have truly ‘guaranteed media freedom’, that is something very special as well as something that is paramount to maintaining a functioning democratic society. It seems as if we almost take for granted the myriad of different sources and outlets that we can pull from and learn from. In this writing I will present you with two different ideologies that weigh in on the media system in America today, one from a liberal’s point of view and one from a conservatives point of view.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When I was at church they taught me something else/ If you preach hate at the service those words aren't anointed/ That holy water that you soak in has been poisoned/ When everyone else is more comfortable remaining voiceless/ Rather than fighting for humans that have had their rights stolen/ I might not be the same, but that's not important/…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The length the government goes through to keep censorship on this city/world is far too much. The entertainment is limited, and what they want you to see, nothing more. The schools and workplaces are strict and allow no personal thought or ideas. And if you jeopardise any of their laws or thinking processes than you are considered an outlaw and are eliminated as soon as possible.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you turn on the television you see public opinions. When you turn on the radio you hear public opinions. When you read a magazine you see public opinions. If public opinions are constantly surrounding us wherever we look, that means they have complete control over our life. Public opinions from television shows, political figures, talk radios, entertainers and magazines do not help us become better people and instead stunt our growth. If we want to develop our minds without the impact of society’s public opinions, we need to remove ourselves from seeing as many public opinions in our life as possible because these opinions are not worthwhile and neither do they help express the opinions of the democratic values. Personal opinions are…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Internet provides a growing platform for inaccurate, untrue and questionable information. On the upside, the miracle of Internet connectivity speeds peoples access to the information, knowledge and insights that contribute to humanities social and intellectual evolution. It also helps sweep aside information gatekeepers in positions of power whose “arrogant . . . unimaginative and shortsighted” approach to information has traditionally promoted their own interests and attitudes toward control (Lovett 16). Lovett states that “the right to free speech begins and ends with the First Amendment, but there is a vast middle where our freedom of speech is protected by our capacity to listen and accept that people disagree” (18). The First Amendment’s protections have always put a great deal of responsibility in the hands of the people and now they have more of that power…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his essay “Opinion Rights,” Jamie Whyte argues that “we are not entitled to our opinions, nor should we be, because such an entitlement is the enemy of intellectual progress” (13). Whyte supports his claim by informing his audience that rights to an opinion entail duties. Whyte states that “the only time people invoke the right to their opinions is when they have suddenly realized they have no grounds upon which they can hold those opinions and thus are left instead with nothing but selfish motives for holding those opinions” (16). Based on Whyte’s claim we should all support our opinions with evidence.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dangerous Double Standards

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Perhaps it is impossible to deal with online harassment; prosecutors are not jumping out of their seats to try people from across the world for saying mean things. However, relying on the moderation of content by content providers has failed, and the human costs of such harassment are not mitigated by the medium from which it originated. That Jerry Falwell was said to have had committed incest in a Hustler Magazine parody rather than in Time was an important factor in why he lost Hustler vs. Falwell. Even though Jerry Falwell was gravely offended by Hustler’s assertion and he had, by all intents and purposes, a legitimate grievance to say that the Hustler ad caused him emotional distress, he lost the case because Hustler Magazine was not a serious news publication in which a reasonable person could assume that the ad was factual. If one goes onto a pro-anorexia website and sees advice, photos, and stories on how to acquire and maintain an eating disorder, could we say that that content is not intentionally inflicting emotional harm if it is a parody of legitimate medical websites? The term ‘intentional infliction of emotional distress’ may as well be rendered moot if the standard for meeting it is so astronomically high that no action beyond pure character assassination in what is considered to be a legitimate news outlet by a writer who claims to be serious and not a satirist and featuring a figure who is considered to be a private individual shall meet the…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    MacKinnon’s push for the removal of the right to free speech is not only reckless, but extremely dangerous. As an American, MacKinnon fails to recognise that it is a fundamental democratic right recognized in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and that freedom of speech is far too precious a protection to be eliminated. She attempts to justify her arguments by using the example of protecting pornography. This poor argument to such an important right in the US does not represent it in its full scope. The First Amendment ensures that speech ensures that every person has the opportunity to express their views.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Swift Satire

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A wise man once said, “I see offense of the collateral damage of free speech. I hate the thought of a person’s ideas being modified or even hushed because someone somewhere might not like to hear them…”(Ricky Gervais, 2013) This generation faces many social issues, but the main on that offends many people is Freedom of Speech about Christianity. In today’s society it is okay for someone to have their own opinion as long as they don’t say something about Christianity that may cause another person to feel or be offended. Today’s generation has become so overly offended by Christianity that the truth has become based upon what is socially acceptable to say. People who speak the truth are being muzzled and even killed because they said something that caused another person to be offended. Our generation is no longer willing to stand up for what they believe is right and wrong for a social change to happen.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The subjects of concern are the brave judges belonging to the 20th Century who were the pillars that laid the foundation of the First Amendment that called for what has widely become lingo – freedom of speech – but which has also become largely distorted and diluted in its meaning, in its context, and in its essence. Lewis reminds us what this amendment in the Constitution truly entails – the restriction laid on the government, the banning of offensive speech on the government’s part, is the focal point of the argument that Lewis puts before his readers. His advocacy for the first amendment and his reminder comes at a likely time for reminders, when the campaigns elections are in full swing, and when the State has been suddenly taken as if by a thunderous storm of hate speech, offensive speech, and what is tantamount to straight up vulgarity. Lewis reminds his audiences and jogs our memories back to the draft in the Constitution that deal so strictly with the issue of offensive speech. A timely judgment on Lewis’ part, this kernel of concentrated thought hits the mark with acute precision and with an iron fist, and puts many a cheek to the red blush of shame, and guilt, and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The American society has become so politically correct, that no one is able to speak their mind without facing major judgment or discrimination.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Television has been under fire since its dawn; even though it has been one of the most widely used forms of mass media since it replaced radio after the 1940’s. By both mirroring and modeling American cultures and values , television gave critics a platform to create regulations because of the negative impact that it seemed to be having on our youth, yet at the same time praising it for creating public awareness.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACLU Legal Case Study

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another issue that is being battled are the profanity laws, laws to control "obscene" material. ACLU believes that "a free and equitable society should ensure each individual the privilege to choose what craftsmanship or stimulation they read, watch, or listen to" which implies everyone has the option to see and acquire media in which they need. Since whats "obscene" is not a widespread understanding, what is considered obscene is made up because of situations. This is likewise contradicting with the constitution particularly, in light of the fact that America is a vote based nation. In the 1997, the Supreme Court ruling against the communication decency act of the Reno v ACLU case. This made a more extensive protection that restrains the content of what's communicated on the radio and television. I bolster ACLU in light of the fact that I trust that we as a whole have voices and we ought to have the capacity to convey what needs be however to the degree where our message is heard yet non…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays