When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Nowadays the advances of technologies and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant impact of a nation's traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary that it would make conventional skills and life styles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern technologies 1,traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems caused by mainstreamed ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies For examples, a cosy restaurant where traditional,. home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavour and come out of mass production with new technologies. it is such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people become relaxed and knowledgeable. Traditional skills and ways of life could continue to have their place to provide diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life 2, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies for example, sparkled by how the word "love" is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The products have boosted the companies' sales, which in turn have increased their investment in preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies To conclude, traditional skills and ways of life are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that some would thrive when their roles are appreciated
In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. what is your opinion? The issue of whether or not children should be engaged in some paid work has sparked a heated debate. While some argue that having some employment experience is conducive to a child's learning and development, I contend that it would bring harm to the child's health and learning.
1,First of all, a workplace is designed for adults is normally lacks child-friendly facilities For example, Desks and chairs are too high for a child, the switches are installed on the wall unreachable for children; also emergency training and facilities such as phones are only provided to adults. Furthermore, various hazards such as polluted air and chemical fumes are still produced in factories and farms. Undoubtedly young children would suffer in such workplaces
2,Secondly, children would find it frustrating when they are not properly inducted before starting a job. For example, a child work in a cement factory would feel a set-back when he could not get immediate support while struggling with the procedures of recording different raw materials that is required by the job. Furthermore, without sufficient support, a child's misunderstanding or inappropriately communicating with adults would only disappoint him and prevents him from active learning and interacting with other people.
In conclusion, a child's paid employment experience would lead to negative impact on their health and learning process. However, recognizing the importance of children's learning and their awareness of responsibility, it is advisable to encourage them to be involved in some volunteering...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document