Preview

Ielts

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ielts
FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SUCCESS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT AMONGST MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN MALAYSIA: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

CHAN Wai Kuen, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Tel. No.: 04 6577888
Fax No.: 04 6577448

Assoc Prof Dr Suhaiza ZAILANI, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Tel. No.: 04 6577888 ext 3952
Fax No.: 04 6577448
Email: shmz@usm.my

Factors Influencing the Success of Project Management amongst Manufacturing Companies in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework

ABSTRACT

The project management process is complex, usually required extensive and collective attention to a broad aspect of human, budgetary and technical variables. In addition, projects often possess a specialized set of critical success factors in which if addressed and attention given will improve the likelihood of successful implementation. On the other hand if these factors were not taken seriously might lead to the failure of the project management. As projects are being used widely in the manufacturing industry, it is therefore, vital to identify factors that contribute to the successful implementation of project and to identify the factors’ relative importance as the project journeyed throughout its life cycle. This paper, therefore, identifies what are the influencing factors for the success of the project, particularly in the Malaysian context. Being a conceptual paper, this paper provides a framework that identifies the factors for the project success. The framework is expected to be tested empirically using data from manufacturing firms in Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION

The manufacturing sector has been the engine of the growth of the Malaysian economy for the past 30 decades. This is seen by the steady growth of new investments and re-investments by multinational corporations (MNC) particularly in the electrical and electronic sector as well as local



References: Adams, J. R., Barnt, S. E. and Barndt, S. E. Behavioral implications of the project life cycle. Project Management Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York. 1983 Atkinson, R Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25 –32 Belassi, W., and Tukel, O.I Belout, A. (1998). Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: toward a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 21 – 26 Bernama Web site Bin. J., Heiser, D. R. (2004). The eye diagram: A new perspective on the project life cycle. Journal of Education for Business, 80(1), 10 - 16 Bonnal, P., Gourc, D., and Lacoste, G Bredillet, C. N. (2005). Reconciling Uncertainty and responsibility in the management of project. Project Management Journal, 36(3), 3 - 4 Clarke, A Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), 164 – 170 Crawford, L., Pollack, J., England, D Geddes and Grosset, Webster’s New Dictionary. Scotland, 1990 Invest Penang Web site Kerzner H. In Search of Excellence in Project Management. John Wiley and Sons, 1998 Kerzner, H Kloppenborg, T. J., Petrick, J. A. (1999). Leadership in project life cycle and team character development. Project Management Journal, 30(2), 8 – 13 Kow Krajewski, L. J., and Ritzman, L. P. (2005) Operations Management: Processes and Value Chains, 7th edition. NJ: Upper Saddle River, Pearson Education. Lim. C. S., and Mohamed, M. Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: An exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 243 – 248 Malaysia Department of Statistics Web site Munns, A. K., and Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81 – 88 Pinto, J Pinto, J. K., Dennis, P. S. (1987). Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation. ABI/INFORM, 33 – 40 Pinto, J Prabhakar. G. P. (2005). An empirical study reflecting the importance of transformational leadership on project success across twenty-eight nations. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 53 - 60 Project Management Course Web site Project Management Institute Web site. Retrieved 23rd March 2006, from http://www.pmi.org Sekaran Uma (2003) Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O. and Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5 – 13 Thamhain, H Tukel, O. I., Rom, W. O. (2001). An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(3), 400 – 409 Turner, J Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 59 – 63 -----------------------

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful