Icur Hardys Case Study Panthers

This solution has few costs as it does not involve implementing an education program for team members or creating a foundation for domestic violence victims. Yet, this solution still impacts the Panthers’ finances. Many fans of the team and Carolina residents will respect this decision and choose to purchase tickets or merchandise in support of it. However, fans in support of Hardy may choose not to buy Panthers tickets or merchandise. This solution will also mitigate the risk of losing corporate sponsorships. Without Hardy, the team will not be as successful on the field, and thus, may suffer financially, as less fans and Carolina residents will purchase tickets and merchandise. Their decreased success on the field will also hinder Richardson’s goal of winning the Super Bowl Championship.
Solution B Evaluation:
This more moderate approach will still appeal to those who condemn Hardy, and will encourage them to buy Panthers tickets and merchandise. However, some will still feel that this punishment was too harsh, while others will consider it not harsh enough. This solution may reduce the risk of losing sponsorships but the education program for team members and foundation to support domestic violence victims will also incur
They will also lose profit as many fans who condemn Hardy’s actions will choose to no longer attend Panthers games or purchase Panthers merchandise. However, those who support Hardy will continue to cheer on the team. It is likely the Panthers will lose corporate sponsorships by choosing this solution. This solution is also the least ethical - while it requires Hardy to perform community service and seek help, it mostly excuses and dismisses his behaviour. Keeping Hardy on the team will also help the team’s athletic success the most, but players who do not support Hardy due to his actions may be resentful and hesitant to play on the same team as