Hypotheses of the Effects of Wolf Predation

Topics: Predation, Population, Population ecology Pages: 6 (1868 words) Published: October 8, 1999
Hypotheses of the Effects of Wolf Predation

John Feldersnatch
December 1st, 1995

Abstract: This paper discusses four hypotheses to explain the effects of wolf predation on prey populations of large ungulates. The four proposed hypotheses examined are the predation limiting hypothesis, the predation regulating hypothesis, the predator pit hypothesis, and the stable limit cycle hypothesis. There is much research literature that discusses how these hypotheses can be used to interpret various data sets obtained from field studies. It was concluded that the predation limiting hypothesis fit most study cases, but that more research is necessary to account for multiple predator - multiple prey relationships.

The effects of predation can have an enormous impact on the ecological organization and structure of communities. The processes of predation affect virtually every species to some degree or another. Predation can be defined as when members of one species eat (and/or kill) those of another species. The specific type of predation between wolves and large ungulates involves carnivores preying on herbivores. Predation can have many possible effects on the interrelations of populations. To draw any correlations between the effects of these predator-prey interactions requires studies of a long duration, and statistical analysis of large data sets representative of the populations as a whole. Predation could limit the prey distribution and decrease abundance. Such limitation may be desirable in the case of pest species, or undesirable to some individuals as with game animals or endangered species. Predation may also act as a major selective force. The effects of predator prey coevolution can explain many evolutionary adaptations in both predator and prey species.

The effects of wolf predation on species of large ungulates have proven to be controversial and elusive. There have been many different models proposed to describe the processes operating on populations influenced by wolf predation. Some of the proposed mechanisms include the predation limiting hypothesis, the predation regulating hypothesis, the predator pit hypothesis, and the stable limit cycle hypothesis (Boutin 1992). The purpose of this paper is to assess the empirical data on population dynamics and attempt to determine if one of the four hypotheses is a better model of the effects of wolf predation on ungulate population densities.

The predation limiting hypothesis proposes that predation is the primary factor that limits prey density. In this non- equilibrium model recurrent fluctuations occur in the prey population. This implies that the prey population does not return to some particular equilibrium after deviation. The predation limiting hypothesis involves a density independent mechanism. The mechanism might apply to one prey - one predator systems (Boutin 1992). This hypothesis predicts that losses of prey due to predation will be large enough to halt prey population increase.

Many studies support the hypothesis that predation limits prey density. Bergerud et al. (1983) concluded from their study of the interrelations of wolves and moose in the Pukaskwa National Park that wolf predation limited, and may have caused a decline in, the moose population, and that if wolves were eliminated, the moose population would increase until limited by some other regulatory factor, such as food availability. However, they go on to point out that this upper limit will not be sustainable, but will eventually lead to resource depletion and population decline. Seip (1992) found that high wolf predation on caribou in the Quesnel Lake area resulted in a decline in the population, while low wolf predation in the Wells Gray Provincial Park resulted in a slowly increasing population. Wolf predation at the Quesnel Lake area remained high despite a fifty percent decline in the caribou population, indicating that mortality due to predation was not density-dependent...

Cited: Bergerud, A. T., W. Wyett, and B. Snider. 1983. The role of wolf predation in
limiting a moose population
127. Dale, B. W., L. G. Adams, and R. T. Bowyer. 1994. Functional response
of wolves preying on barren-ground caribou
Burris. 1983. Interrelationships of
wolves, prey, and man in interior Alaska
Messier, F.. 1985. Social organization, spatial distribution, and population
density of wolves in relation to moose
density. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 63: 1068-1077. Messier, F.. 1994.
75(2): 478-488. Seip, D.. 1992. Factors limiting woodland caribou
populations and their interrelationships with wolves and moose in
Thompson, I. D., and R. O. Peterson. 1988. Does wolf predation alone limit the
moose population in Pukaskwa Park?:
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Wolf Effect Essay
  • Essay about wolf
  • Wolf Essay
  • Wolf Essay
  • Essay about Wolf
  • Reintroduction of the Wolf Essay
  • The Dire Wolf Essay
  • Types of Hypotheses Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free