Preview

Huxley's Vision In 1984 By George Orwell

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Huxley's Vision In 1984 By George Orwell
In today’s contemporary society, Postman’s assertion that Huxley’s vision is more relevant than Orwell’s vision is found to be untrue. While Orwell states some valid points in his prediction of the future, Huxley’s vision seems to be much more familiar and recognizable when we take a look at the world around us. Although we don’t live in a complete police state that controls the media like the citizens in George Orwell’s “1984,” the American government still uses various methods in order to influence which sources of information we use, albeit in more subtle ways.
Trump has substantiated Orwell’s vision by attacking major news sources which oppose him in an effort to discredit them and prevent others from paying attention to them. Just yesterday,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The contemporary critic Neil Postman contrasts George Orwell’s vision of the future, as expressed in the novel 1984, as well as Aldous Huxley’s in the Brave New World. Orwell makes assumptions about society as a whole, that by the year 1984 a totalitarian government would take over the country. In Orwell’s novel, society is revealed as a dark vision of the future “controlled by inflicting pain”. On the other hand in Huxley’s novel, Huxley fears that what we love will ruin us and society is “controlled by inflicting pleasure”. Postman’s assertion that Huxley’s vision of the future is more relevant today than Orwell’s is correct as revealed by society’s rising need for instant gratification for technology, as well as the need for distractions from important concepts.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel 1984, written by George Orwell, it is clear that the members of Oceania are heavily influenced into blindly believing the ideas of the Party without any questions. Throughout the book, these mantras are constantly repeated: war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. Clearly, the first two mantras are natural opposites of each other, but the last one is not the complete opposite. Instead of saying weakness is strength, George Orwell states that ignorance is the true strength behind the Party. It is evident that the Party goes to great lengths to make sure that no members, besides the Inner Party, are intelligent and are ignorant of the truth behind the Party. To achieve this the Party punishes against opposing thoughts, intelligence, and free will.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did the party use control to maintain the society? George Orwell’s 1984 is a novel about a totalitarian dystopian society where the people have no freedom, always on constant surveillance by “Big Brother” and are constantly being brainwashed. Where “no one is free, even the birds are chained to the sky.” In the novel 1984, George Orwell shows how the party uses control to maintain society and place fear upon the society. In 1984 the party uses fear, torture, the control over sex instinct, propaganda to control and maintain order in the society.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does ‘prole’ mean? The Oxford dictionaries describes ‘prole’ as ‘a member of the working class.’ The book 1984 portrays the Proles in similar way, who are weak, animal-like, working class people. The Proles in 1984 are the vast majority (85%) of the populace, but they do not have a significant part in the novel. The Proles live in a deserted area which is described as very filthy, “He was walking up a cobbled street of little two-storey houses with battered doorways which gave straight on the pavement and which were somehow curiously suggestive of rat holes” (Orwell, 86) Furthermore, Orwell represented the Proles as “swollen, waddling women” and “old bent creatures shuffling along on splayed feet” (Orwell, 86) which shows that they…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excuse me, sir, but I believe that’s mine -- please hand back that tiara. Yes, that one, with the 2-cent, plastic gems and broken hairclip on the left side that you just swiped off my head with enough self-deprecating humor to goad me into chuckling along. I’ll wear my tiara, fabricated and monarchist though it may be, because as much as you might think so, life isn’t a statistics class. Just because the rest of the world is special doesn’t mean I can’t be too.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Orwell's horrendous yet prophetic vision of the future in his novel, 1984 has come and gone. In this nightmarish novel, Oceania, where the story takes place, is the perfect depiction of "Negative Utopia" in which the government is in total control of their citizens. They control every aspect of their life. From the smallest things as the clothes their citizen wore on a daily basis to the person they were allowed to marry to their thoughts. Freedom of choice and thought was unquestionable and was not allowed and anything or anyone that went against this principle or resisted oppression was completely suppressed themselves. Now, in 2006 under our current government there are a lot of similarities between the haunting novel of the "Negative…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ]In conclusion, based on Orwell’s book, he is trying to warn the future about totalitarianism and how this form of government is not right to control a country. For this reason, North Korea became Oceanica, they lost their freedom of religion, freedom of information, and freedom of speech. Ultimately, the citizens are brainwashed into whatever their leaders tell them. The fundamentals of being human is to be able to have the ability to have beliefs and be open minded. In particular, North Korea are human but do not have the ability to live like human (Life inside North Korea).…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When two claims contradict one another, it is futile and useless in attempting to analogize between the two. George Orwell, the author of the novel 1984, defines doublethink as "the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." It is the idea of genuinely accepting two conflicting ideas, which eliminates an individual's capacity of being able to think or act freely. Dinh, the author of both the Patriot Act and the essay "How the USA Patriot Act Defends Democracy", uses a modern day form of double think in an attempt to justify the Patriot Act, an act which unconstitutionally violates the individual's right of privacy through the clandestine use of surveillance. Gelsey, the author of the essay "The FBI is Reading over Your Shoulder" illustrates the potential effect of the Library Records Provision of the Patriot Act, otherwise known as Section 215. Section 215 allows the government to search and obtain the records of any individual without the individual's consent or knowledge. Gelsey claims that "intimidating readers in such a manner is, in effect, controlling what we read and how we think", thus it "circumvents the First Amendment by threatening readers rather than prohibiting what they read." Gelsey compares this statement to Winston Smith, the protagonist of the novel 1984, whose capacity of free thought and self expression is impaired and damaged due to constant monitoring and surveillance. The two conflicting claims of both Dinh and Gelsey bring in to point the issue of protecting individual rights versus the right of the state to access an individual's private information. Dinh claims that a balance of "ideals" and "techniques" is necessary and required for the rights of the individual to be protected. However, these "techniques" of surveillance and monitoring violate those "ideals", which are the constitutional rights that protect an individual from state power. Dinh's…

    • 2423 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Brave new world” is a book about a New World. In this New World there is no love, there are no strong emotions and everything is about the community and not about the individual. In the New World only Community and Stability really matter. This New World is situated in the future (the year 623 After Ford).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Orwell's 1984

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Orwell’s 1984 describes a totalitarian government and methods used by them to gain control of the populace. I am going to discuss how 1984 describes populace of the Outer Party and the Proles helped to maintain the dystopian society in which they lived. I would also talk about what Slouka, Atkinsson and Marquez would suggest on how to avoid these problems. Orwell’s book largely describes the great divide between the inner party members and others. The others consist of Proles and the Outer Party members. The inner party members live a life of luxury whereas the others suffer in poverty. How do these people maintain the dystopian society? The populace of the outer party are kept constantly under watch by installing telescreens in their houses.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the novel, “Brave New World”, encourages sexual intercourse, drug use, and opposes any form of family, and religion it should be kept in the high school curriculum because these are our worst features of our world drawn out and exaggerated, and humanity seems to be moving closer to Huxley’s dystopian vision.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can sort of understand what Mr. Huxley is trying to say about the world in his book "A Brave New World" is sort of what he sees happening in the world that we live in. Through the ways that we raise our children, to how we look at things physiologically. To the way things are brought up to this world. He makes it seem in his that we live in a world were an actual God exists. In the end, in Mr. Huxley's perspective, he sees our world turning for the worst.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    kak lang

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the following passage, the contemporary social critic Neil Postman contrasts George Orwell’s vision of the future, as expressed in the novel 1984 (written in 1948), with that of Aldous Huxley in the novel Brave New World (1936). Read the passage considering whether Postman’s assertion of Huxley’s vision is more relevant today than is Orwell’s. Then, using your own critical understanding of contemporary society as evidence, write a carefully argued essay that agrees or disagrees with Postman’s assertion.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Winston strongly believes that the proles are the last hope for the prosperity of Oceania and that they will, one day, wake up and revolt, O’Brien argues that they will never rebel against the government because they are content with their daily life. I, however, side with O’Brien. Although, the proles are the only hope, as Winston states, and have the strength in numbers, O’Brien is right when he claims that the proles “are helpless, like the animals. Humanity is the party. The others are outside--irrelevant” (Orwell 269). When O’Brien says this, it conveys to the audience how little the percentage of the proles that are literate and how low their education skills are. The proles are not involved with the government what so ever, they hold no power. The idea of…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Technology has strived through history to make what it is today. To the making of the wheel, cotton gin, to the first transportation system in America. A particular piece of new technology, the smartphone, allows communication through two screens and permits audio. This has particularly brought to attention because of its similarity to George Orwell’s 1984 telescreens. In the book, an authoritarian government ruled by Big Brother controls its people by various telescreens planted around various places, hidden to the eye. Shown by the quote, “Big Brother is watching you,” the setting in 1984 is ruled by fear. An alarming question brought upon us is, “are we reaching a similar setting as George Orwell’s imagination?” Although there may be important counterarguments, the answer to that question is no.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays