Preview

Humans Nature - Good or Bad?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1148 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Humans Nature - Good or Bad?
Human Nature
Good or Bad?

Whether human beings are instinctually good or evil in an elementary natural state is a question that has been boggling the minds of even the greatest philosophers. There is a spectrum of theories that support both good and evil within the human race, each with valid points that explains the range of our interests, being either for ourselves or for others. However, my personal stance is the sensible theory of Altruism. Past experiences and observations allow me to take the stance, and support the argument that humans are caring and genuinely good individuals and have the will and desire to help those around them. Philosophers such as Mengzi (4th Century BCE) also known as Mencius in the West, explains how humans have an “innate sense of right and wrong, a natural sympathetic reaction to people in distress or pain and natural sense of propriety.” 1 His theory states that all human beings share an innate goodness that can either be cultivated through education and self-discipline or wasted with neglect and negative influences, but the inner good can never be lost altogether. Mencius uses the example of a man witnessing a child falling into a well, as an example for his theory of innate goodness within humans. “If a man sees a child who is in danger of falling into a well, then that man will almost certainly try to rescue the child.” 2 The witness is not saving the child for the gain of the parent’s friendship, or to gain admiration of the neighborly public, but for the sake of saving the innocent and for his own nature. This example not only supports the idea that benevolence and righteousness are more rational motives for human actions then that of desire for profit or personal gain, but because we are caught off our guard, the example proves the manifestation of our good human qualities. Mencius continues with the statement, “If a man is constantly subjected to negative influence, his character is bound to be affected



Bibliography: 1. Paquette, Paul G., and Laura Ginni-Newman. Philosophy - Questions & Theories. Whitby, ON: McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003. Print. 2. Scott, Alex. "Mengzi (Mencius)." Angelfire: Welcome to Angelfire. 2004. <http://www.angelfire.com/md2/timewarp/mengzi.html>. 3. Chen, C. W. "Good and Evil in Chinese Philosophy." The Philosopher, Volume LXXXIV, 1996. Http://www.the-philosopher.co.uk/good&evil.htm. Web. 4. Schouls, Peter. "Locke, John (1632–1704) - The Tabula Rasa, The Role of Mathematics - Encyclopedia of Children and Childhood in History and Society." Internet FAQ Archives - Online Education - Faqs.org. Web. <http://www.faqs.org/childhood/Ke-Me/Locke-John-1632-1704.html>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    To every child, good or bad seemed very clear to mind. If one stole another’s belongings, lie to their parents, or hurt anyone in any way, it would be seen as a wrong doing, as a morally incorrect behavior. But somehow, as life becomes more complicated, everything that has been done might be based on multiple reasons involving both positive and negative elements. Any act of good cannot be explained as simply because of one’s kindness, and this principle can go with an ill-minded act as well.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mencius proves that people are naturally virtuous by using an illustration of a baby that has fallen into a well. He explains that people will have the urge to assist the baby immediately and will feel concern therefore, humans are good. However, he argues that society can taint one’s inner virtue. If individuals begin to trail after their greed for materialistic objects in the world, then people will succumb to evil. People should cultivate their morals and develop a sense of goodness throughout their…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to Gaozi, Mencius theory of goodness based on the social nature of people. He does not deny that people have a common nature, but he believes that these nature element are common in both human beings and animals, it is not enough to reflect the essence of the unique characteristics of human nature. If human satisfied with comfort life that makes no difference with animals.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people are born neither inherently good nor evil, but are created as blank slates to be constructed by childhood impressions and other life experiences. In my opinion, the concepts of good and bad are impossible to be natural instinct. Rather, these ideas are mainly formed by the guidance and direction from one’s parents, and also by observation of the environment, and how others handle specific interactions.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For years there has been a debate on whether human beings are good or bad, there is no right or wrong answer to this. We have learned these two meanings through different reinforcements taught to us by our peers around us. People of different places and eras have conducted experiments and surveys trying to prove both sides. Some experiments have made the news and showed us just how mad people can become, others are now used to tap into our minds and get our attention. The way we as living individuals interact with one another raises these wonders of the question are humans good or bad. Human’s are neither of these two traits, we are people who learn these characteristics in different ways throughout our lifetime.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual Project Unit 5

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Solomon, R.C. & Higgins, K.M. (2015). The Big Question: A Short Introduction to Philosophy (9th ed.) [Online version]. Retrieved from AIU Online Virtual Campus. Introduction to Philosophy: PHIL201-1503A-03 website.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often we wonder if we are “good” or “evil,” but we also question what makes us either or. Is it something we are born into or do our millions of different circumstances affect the way we behave? I believe that humans are inherently evil, and that society sets laws in order to keep our evils from seeping out. Lord of the Flies and the Holy Bible are excellent examples of how natural human instincts call us to sinful acts.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people have a natural tendency toward evil- but with saving glimpses of goodness because people can choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing, but sadly, many go for the wrong option. Being evil is easier for humans since this comes naturally to them. Humans are lazy and we would rather be evil than good, man also has a tendency to think and put themselves before others, for example, when thinking about a problem or situation, it is natural for everyone to firstly think “Will that help me?” “Will I be safe?”…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hicks, Stephen R.C. "Rand, Ayn Alissa [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 28 Jan. 2002. Rockford College. 2 Dec. 2011 .…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are also myriad examples showing the positivity in human nature. On the contrary, this may be due to taught values in society. One may argue that selfless actions done for other human beings show how humans may be inherently good. An example of an action corresponding to this theme would be an opposing softball team witnessing a girl who stuck a home-run collapse with a knee injury, but instead of leaving her there they brought her around all the bases, sacrificing their victory. The girls on the opposing team say sweet comments such as: “We just wanted to help her (text 4.)” and the girl with the knee injury says how she “would do the same for her in the same situation (text 4.)” One may think that kindness is an inherent property of humans or rather that society just teaches us how helping other human beings is the correct action to take in an event. Without a society to teach man what is morally right, man would want to do what is right for themselves so they can feel satisfied with themselves. Correspondingly, one may argue that “in most cases people will not do things to harm themselves or others (text 2)” therefore proving to be inherently good. Although this may be somewhat true, there is still a lot of violence that is present, even in today’s society. People’s inner evils may be at a chance of increasing due to the others around them acting hostile, therefore reverting their mindsets to their original nature. As explained in Hobbes’ work Leviathan, man “acts morally only when they are sure that others are the same (text 6,)” explaining how morals are put into thought only when others use them. Without the confidence that one is using morals, it is said that humans’ “rational behaviour leads [them] to attack others (text 6,)” which exhibits to how people may not do things to harm others when morals are present, but act more violent when morals are…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xunzi Vs Mencius Analysis

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For centuries, mankind has struggled with the question, "Are we good by nature?" Do we do good deeds only out of selfish desires, or is there a real shred of decency somewhere in our being? Even today, lawyers argue whether a killer's motives for committing atrocious crimes stem from the fact that he has a naturally incompetent tendency, or if outside influences, such as a difficult childhood, turned a naturally innocent person into a murderer. The Chinese philosophers, Mencius and Xunzi, explored this difficulty in their philosophies. While both considered themselves disciples of the philosopher, Confucius, their perspective on humans were different. Mencius had an optimistic view of humans, while Xunzi saw humans as creatures in need of reform.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Mankind Inherently Evil

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, the word ‘good is defined as “Of a favorable character or tendency,” and the word evil is defined as, “morally reprehensible.” Philosophers and Psychologist have debated on the topic of humans being good or evil for centuries and our society is still unsure of what to believe. Humans do not like to think of themselves as pure evil, but they also do not consider themselves all good either. Although some may claim humans are inherently good , the truth is humankind is inherently evil because of selfishness, and revenge.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A debate encompassing human nature has carried on for centuries, and philosophers throughout history have provided a vast inventory of explanations they deem to be sufficient in understanding the perplex idea of human nature. A question commonly debated regarding human nature is determining whether human beings are naturally self-interested or altruistic. Political philosophers Bernard Mandeville and Francis Hutcheson specifically addressed this question, but each arrived at different conclusions based on personal observation and reasoning. Mandeville, influenced by Hobbesian thought, advocated the belief that human beings were naturally self-interested. Opposing the idea of self-interest, Francis Hutcheson attacked Mandeville’s notion and reasoned that human beings were inherently altruistic. Although both sets of ideals originated in the early 18th century, both can be utilized to infer about current events and situations (Tannenbaum & Schultz, 2004).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Question of Humanity’s Morality Are humans inherently good or evil? Some people would say that humans are naturally good and compassionate, and have to try to be evil. Others argue that humans are evil, and to be good we have to overcome the evilness that naturally resides in us. In reality, mankind is neither inherently good nor evil. It is our brain development, upbringing, culture, and environment that determines where people are morally.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kwong-loi, Shun. The Idea of the Good in Chinese Philosophy, in A Companion to World Philosophies edited by E. Deutsch and R. Bontekoe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997. Print.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays