Top-Rated Free Essay

Humanity

Good Essays
"Am I Free or Determined?"
Since I learn to understand the world I always believe in two saying that, “everything happens for a reason’ and “never compunction the past because it made you who you are today”. I have felt that these statements have always been supportive and positive in my life. After studying determinism, these statements seem to epitomize the theory of cause and effects. Determinism is the doctrine that all events, including human choice and decisions, are necessarily determined by motives, which are regarded as external forces acting on the will. The opposing theory is libertarianism and is an older encouragement than its rival. Libertarians view that at least some human actions are free and depending on the situations people can exercise their free will.
William James an American philosopher and psychologist, defends a moderately reasonable style of libertarianism. He has faith in free will and entitlements we are free whenever we have a genuine choice. I find Mr. James analysis of determinism in Melanie Chaparian’s, “Am I free or determined?” to be substantial in the sense that libertarianism must be contemporary in the human condition but I found his theory a lot more flexible than the declarations by determinism. Libertarianism is more complex because it looks into the human thought process than a simple excuse such as, there is no free will because everything is pre-determined, which takes away any responsibility human should have for their activities. Libertarianism includes the principle of free will, therefore stating that we always have the power to choose our actions, regardless of the situations. Free will is the opposite of determined; this is the key hurdle among Libertarianism and Determinism. In James defense of free will, he argues that we can choose between possible actions and in order to prove that we chose our own action to prove that we have free will and we do what we feel that is right or wrong. People may choose any of the possible actions that will not include pre-determined. After making the decision we may perform action that will include the free will. He also claims that substantial evidences of human life must sufficiently be clarified in any balanced theory of human behavior. Determinism does not prove the feelings of freedom of regret that the human race experiences. Determinists believe the feeling of freedom is illusion and we have no control over our actions and decisions are already made for us and we have to obey them. Libertarianism conforms that we have the freedom of our free will. We make the choice and then make our own decision to follow in order to get success.
In conclusion, Personal experience is often referred to when studying libertarianism. This is why I find it to be the most balanced theory and more in depth and complex then determinism, which is quick to assume and passive towards human feelings. In relation to the statements I first mentioned, theorists such as Friedrich Nietzsche with his “will to power” ideology and William James’ moderate take on Libertarianism, along with the study of Determinism vs. Free Will, has changed my perspective on past choices and what, if anything actually happens for a specific reason. When I think of my statement now that I have feeling that I do have some freedom in my path of life to make decisions and the some of the decision I made in my past.

The large ant
In “The Large Ant” by Howard fast, Mr. Morgan kills the large ant because he is human. It is human nature to look at something out of the standard critically and bee scared of it. In the face of taking highly developing brainpower and high dimensions for reason, when the primal existence constitution is susceptible, the human default setting is to respond with violence without thinking. The ignorant and naturally violent wildlife of humanity will catch up with us and this will be the fate of humankind. We are inevitably doomed with the curse of fear and this is quite apparent in Mr. Morgan’s character in “The Large Ant”.
Every single human being has separate personalities that set them apart from other humans. If we look at the characteristics of human abroad, we think, feel, and act in the same nature in distinctive situations. If human feels the frightened enough that they feel threatened they just over react and they will kills what made them got scared. Mr. Morgan is normal, intelligent and not savage man, he still reacts that way. He thought that he was in danger even though he was not in danger, yet he still reacts as any human would do. That is related to the theory of B.F.Skinner. It’s all about how human behave on the situation and the outcome from that reaction. Human are often unaware why they react the way they do. They might be able to realize that is human nature, but still not to be able to grasp the concept of why. If we look back in the event he says “it was just their” and he kills it. Mr. Morgan cannot explain why he killed it. That shows the existential theory of Friedrich Nietzsche.
Therefore, humanity is fairly violent and in “The Large Ant” by Howard fast this is quite obvious. Mr. Morgan kills the ant because he is human. It’s a human nature to look at something and react on at and be scared of it and this is quite unfamiliar. When human is scared they will react and they will respond with violence without thinking. Soon enough thee ignorant and naturally violent environment off humanity will catch up with us and will be the doom of humankind. We certainly are hopeless with the curse of fear and this is quite apparent in Mr. Morgan’s character in “The Large Ant”.

Bibliography * Symbolism in. (n.d.). Scribd. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/53165209/Symbolism-in * Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee — Do you have free will or is your life determined?. (n.d.). Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://kyleehanson.tumblr.com/post/3811127202/do-you-have-free-will-or-is-your-life-determined

* now., & &, G. c. (n.d.). Is Our Future Determined or Free?. RZIM Europe — Helping the thinker believe and the believer think. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.rzim.eu/is-our-future-determined-or-free

Bibliography: * Symbolism in. (n.d.). Scribd. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/53165209/Symbolism-in * Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee — Do you have free will or is your life determined?. (n.d.). Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://kyleehanson.tumblr.com/post/3811127202/do-you-have-free-will-or-is-your-life-determined * now., & &, G. c. (n.d.). Is Our Future Determined or Free?. RZIM Europe — Helping the thinker believe and the believer think. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.rzim.eu/is-our-future-determined-or-free

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is it possible to act freely if all of our decisions were already predetermined? This interesting question is connected to the most discussed philosophical question. Every philosopher wants to know, “Do human beings ever act freely?” Incompatibilist and compatibilist have been going back and forth about it for years. Compatibilist believe that determinism and free will can both exist. In this paper, we will define determinism, free will, compatibilism, and incompatiblism. I will show how the incompatibilist are right. I am an incompatibilist because I believe determinism and free will cannot coexist since determinism eradicates free will and the purpose of life.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is a concept of much debate. I base my conception of free will on Erasmus's definition. Erasmus argues that free will is “The human will by which man is able to direct himself towards to turn away from what leads to eternal salvation”(6). My conception of free will alters the last clause and instead substitutes, man’s ability to direct himself towards and turn away from success, in addition to having the freedom to define such success. In this paper I will argue that man’s will is never completely free; it is always dependent to some extent on God. I will analyze the philosophical theories of Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, Spinoza, and the movie The Adjustment Bureau, and the arguments they they make in their…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To fully examine whether we are in fact free or not to make moral decisions, we must first analyse what particular factors affect our decision making. When we debate over a decision we consider/ weigh up our options, we know that we have a choice and only we can make that choice, this is known as a libertarian view. Libertarians believe that we have full responsibility of our actions and nothing else affects our decision, however genes, environment, lifestyle and our upbringing affect or sometimes might determine our choices. Determinism objects libertarianism and believes that our choices are influenced by factors other than the will of the individual, events and actions are predetermined by other events therefore freedom of choice is an illusion.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate between free will vs determinism is important because it reflects on actions and intentions of humans, but free will brings up strong valid points supported by evidence. Free will can be simplified as a human does what they ultimately and truly want in their mind, through their own beliefs and character. Determinism is about having strong influences in an environment, that the decisions of individuals reflect off their unconscious mind. Determinism can influence decisions, but the final decision and action is up to the individual. Through past experiences a person can learn and be influenced by everything in their surroundings, but it does not force a person to make a decision based on their past. I do not believe that anything is…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a controversy between whether or not a person has free will. He states that a determinist,…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much debate over the issue of whether we have complete freedom of the will or if our will caused by something other than our own choosing. There are three positions adopted by philosophers regarding this dispute: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Determinists believe that freedom of the will does not exist. Since actions are events that have some predetermined cause, no actions can be chosen and thus there is no will to choose. The compatibilist argues that you can have both freedom of the will and determinism. If the causes which led to our actions were different, then we could have acted in another way which is compatible with freedom of the will. Libertarians believe that freedom of the will does exist.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussing a theory one must start with some data in order to prove the validity of the theory, and in discussing determinism this is no different. Two suitable criteria dealing with the decision making process are: firstly that we at times deliberate with the view of making a decision , and secondly regardless of whether I deliberate I sometimes have a personal choice in the decision making process. These criteria are ideal because they are both things that we as individuals are fairly certain of so any acceptable theory must account for them in some way. For common sense, a virtue in argumentation, suggests that it is easier to accept the veracity of partial self-determination in the decision making process than an abstract philosophical theory. To asses the applicability of the data to determinism a more in depth examination of determinism is needed, which Taylor defines as having three tenets: Firstly, that the theory of determinism is true. Secondly, that voluntary behaviour is free unless constrained, and finally that causes of voluntary behaviour are certain states, condition, decisions, and desires. The principle problem of determinism is precisely this last tenet, for what are the causes of the inner states that cause my actions? Where do they come…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Libertarians would agree with this idea, suggesting we always have a choice. Christian Libertarians argue that God simply offers moral guidance but allows us to behave in the way we want to. Libertarianism is the theory that humans do have genuine freedom to make a morally undetermined decision, although our behaviour may be partially determined by external factors. Libertarianism is the view that when faced with the choice between right and wrong we do act as free agents. Generally libertarianists…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chisholm and Free Will

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before I begin it is pertinent to note the disparate positions on the problem of human freedom. In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick M. Chisholm takes the libertarian stance which is contiguous with the doctrine of incompatibility. Libertarians believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible. The determinist also follow the doctrine of incompatibility, and according to Chisholm's formulation, their view is that every event involved in an act is caused by some other event. Since they adhere to this type of causality, they believe that all actions are consequential and that freedom of the will is illusory. Compatiblist deny the conflict between free will and determinism. A.J. Ayer makes a compatibilist argument in "Freedom and Necessity".…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week’s essay is a comparative analysis of the theories of freedom (indeterminism) and predestination (religious determinism). Our analysis will attempt to prove the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination. First, we will examine the theory of predestination as it is explained in the text “Ethics: Theory and Practice” (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012). The organization of the text lends itself to our analysis since it highlights differences between the two theories in its defining process. We will illustrate the theory of predestination by offering an example which will humanize the theory. Next, we will explore the theory of freedom through the lens of predestination. We will then exhibit the theory of freedom with an example. Finally, we will analyze and compare the two theories by demonstrating their applicability for today’s society and arguing the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays