Preview

Humanities and Social Sciences

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6051 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
William James’s Pragmatism: The Practical Value of Personal truth and
Liberation from Truth
Sam Fogarty

College of Arts and Science, Vanderbilt University

It is easy to mistake one’s beliefs about the world as absolute knowledge. In this paper, I argue that any view of knowledge as absolute, or objective, is a misrepresentation of the limits of human understanding. In contrast, I argue for the pragmatic use of truth as conceived by William
James. I contend that if one views truth as a practical instrument valued solely for its ability to help humans, one can place scientific and religious beliefs on equal footing. By valuing truth for its practical effects, one may return truth to its intended function: to be one’s closest ally in overcoming life’s challenges.
“The influences of the senses has in most men overpowered the mind to the degree that the walls of space and time have come to look solid, real and insurmountable; and to speak with levity of these limits in the world is the sign of insanity.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
With Pragmatism, William James expounds the practical value of truth by applying the pragmatic method to abstract metaphysical questions. James challenges the traditional view of truth as objective, existing separate from the human experience. Rather, he offers a method of “experiential empiricism” to explore life’s most important and challenging questions. The essays comprising Pragmatism employ easily intelligible language, as they were originally delivered as eight separate lectures in 1906 and 1907. Motivated by his own dissatisfaction with scientific theory and spiritual belief as sufficient guides to human satisfaction and sources meaning, James offers more than an academic treatise.
With the work, James directly addresses the seemingly incompatible views of spiritual belief and modern scientific discovery in order to illustrate Pragmatism’s ability to, “be the happy harmonizer of



Cited: James, William. Pragmatism and Other Writings. New York: Penguin Group, 2001. Print. Spring 2012 | Volume 8 | © 2012 • Vanderbilt University Board of Trust 7

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pragmatism arose as the most sophisticated attempt to reconcile science and religion in the wake of the widespread acceptance of Darwinian biology…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacks Great Partnership

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’ The Great Partnership: Science, Religion and the Search for Meaning depicts Sacks’ understanding of the relationship between religion and science. In the first part of the book, Sacks’ differentiates between religion and science and discusses some of the reasons why people believe that science and religion are incompatible. The second part of Sacks’ book is primarily about the importance of religion and the effect on the world if religion was lost. The last and final part of his book goes over some of the major challenges that science and people pose to faith. The main thesis of Sacks’ book is that science and religion are two ways of thinking that are necessary and compatible with one another. According to Sacks’ science…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    F: “What these students came to realize is that good arguments are based not on knowledge that only a special class of experts has access to, but on everyday habits of mind that can be isolated, identified, and used by almost anyone”(56).…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is astonishing to see how many philosophical disputes collapse into insignificance the moment you subject them to this simple test of tracing a concrete consequence. -William James, the father of pragmatism…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessing the value behind truth, and whether or not that value is beneficial, results in numerous possible theories. The idea that truth is relative to progression cannot be proven, as there are many other factors that give life meaning. Multiple suggestions about subversive truth are constantly debated. Philip Kitcher, in his work, “Subversive Truth and Ideals of Progress,” analyzes these possibilities in an attempt to reason with the unresolved.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein Vs Phyllis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sixth graders, generally curious people, learn about so many new things and attempt to make sense of it all. They may notice the overlap of religion and science and have many questions pertaining to these two areas. Phyllis noticed this and began to question how faith and science go together, or if they do at all. Particularly, she was curious if scientists pray, and if so, what for. In order to attempt to find an answer for Phyllis, Einstein shared some of his past experiences and knowledge, along with his own view on the situation. Einstein answered her in a letter by telling her scientists don’t pray but instead believe in the laws of nature based on a sort of faith.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Sanders

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the world's greatest scientists to have ever lived, Albert Einstein, won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921. Already famous and a household name, he wrote a letter replying to a sixth-grade student named Phyllis Wright in January of 1936. This context made Albert Einstein the speaker, Phyllis Wright the audience, and the question and the answer to it, the subject. She had originially asked him if scientists pray and if they do, what for. Einstein responded saying, that it is tough to pray for something science related when science is based on laws of nature. However he continues saying, not all of those laws are set in cement and that believing in their existence takes some what of a faith. Next he describes that many dedicated scientists believe that there is something bigger than human kind that is responsible for the laws of the universe; but that that religious thought is much different than that of a younger person's, like Phyllis herself.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J. The Truth About False Belief. New York, NY: Guliford Press…

    • 1364 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dionysus Mirror

    • 3237 Words
    • 13 Pages

    “The character of the world in a state of becoming as incapable of formulation, as ‘false’, as ‘self-contradictory’. Knowledge and becoming exclude one another”(517).…

    • 3237 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanities

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While reading Three articles concerning the collapse of the maya civilization, I read about debates why the civilization fell apart. Ancient Mayan empire was approximately A.D 250 to A.D 900. The mayan Civilization once extended through out the area of Texas, southern Mexico, and Northern Central America, This includes the countries of Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, and Honduras. The mayans was a very advanced civilization they had a break through in astronomy which helped them predict where the moon and planets would lay in the sky. The mayans left behind stone inscriptions and books regarding their gods, which taught us a lot about the mayan empire. A common reason the empire collapsed was drought which stopped the mayans from agriculture, and many more examples of the falling of the empire.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanities

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is always said that we are all predestined with a set prophecy. No matter how much one tries to escape it, our fate will always conquer. Whether it’s finding the right person who you are going to marry or the career path a person chooses, it’s all up to the decision of fate. Knowing ones fate can either uplift or destroy a person because of the path it permits the person to take. Oedipus Rex by Sophocles is a prime example of how one’s fate destroys him and he couldn’t escape it. Oedipus being the main character, gains knowledge of his horrid fate and attempts to break away from it. Because Oedipus gains knowledge of his fate and does try and run from it, he mistakenly kills his father and marries his mother, denies the truth, and blinds himself.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Modern philosophy began with an enthusiastic faith in the powers of human reason to reach the truth. It represented a protest against the methods of Scholasticism and demanded a free field for unrestricted inquiry to work out its own salvation.[2]”…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although distinctions similar to Kant’s a priori–a posteriori distinction and his synthetic–analytic distinction have been made by thinkers such as Hume and Leibniz, Kant is the first to apply two such distinctions to generate a third category for knowledge. Hume, for instance, does not distinguish between what Kant calls the analytic and the a priori and what he calls the synthetic and the a posteriori, so that, for Hume, all synthetic judgments are necessarily a posteriori. Since only a priori truths have the important qualities of being universal and necessary, all general truths about reality—as opposed to particular observations about unconnected events—must be a priori. If our a priori knowledge is limited to definitional analytic judgments, then Hume is right in concluding that rationally justified knowledge of universal and necessary truths is impossible. Kant’s coup comes in determining that synthetic judgments can also be a priori. He shows that mathematics and scientific principles are neither analytic nor a posteriori, and he provides an explanation for the category of the synthetic a priori by arguing that our mental faculties shape our…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics