Preview

Human Enhancement Ethical Issues

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Enhancement Ethical Issues
The advent of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering brought about the prospect of human enhancement – that is, of such a use of medicine or technology that would improve human physical and mental traits beyond what is currently regarded as their ‘normal’ scope. In consequence, as the promise of enhancement is moving steadily from science fiction to daily news, a whole new debate emerged on the ethical and legal implications of such ---.
In this article, a voice in the enhancement dispute is raised that draws heavily on Kantian ethics. The reasons for such approach are given in the first section alongside with a more detailed outline of the adopted Kantian stance. In the two subsequent sections, two main issues are discussed: that is,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Most people would concede that cloning and genetic enhancements are two notorious words that most would not consent with. In Mr. Kass’s article “Preventing Brave New World” commences on the astonishing achievements in bio-medical science and technology. Mr. Leon E. Kass agrees that people should be obliged for the breakthrough of advanced bio medical science and technology. Mr. Kass’s incredible work in bio-ethical science has placed this very well known philosopher in the white house with the Bush’s administration. Mr. Kass mentions in his article that we live in a world where transforming powers are already being applied in the 20th century, For example; In vitro fertilization, bottled embryos wombs, surrogate wombs, cloning, genetic screening,…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “staying human” by author Dinesh D’Souza, we are given a voice of reason in response to the “techno utopians” desire to use science as a means to create perfection known as, “post humans.” D’Souza voices that the ability to do something, does not substantiate actually doing it. And, that it “it poses a grave risk to humans.” D’Souza disagrees with “techno-utopians,” and follows the belief that genetic engineering pertaining to modifying intellect and physical attributes in unethical, especially, parents who would elect to make choices about their unborn children. However, D’Souza does find a medium, and believes that genetic engineering could offer many benefits to humanity, such as preventing illness and deformities.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belinda: Many other disciplines have had ongoing discourse and debates on how to address enhancement technologies. On one end of the spectrum we have the bioluddites, which consists of religious conservatives, feminists, environmentalist, disability rights supporters and activists who oppose genetically engineered food, cloning, nanotechnology, embryonic stem cell research, invitro fertilization and human enhancement. Some…

    • 5600 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crichton Vs Calfee

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I am not positive that I would appreciate being told that I can’t do something with my body or contents thereof without permission to do so, in fact that individual might just be met with a what could be considered a cruel and vulgar response. There are two well educated men that differ on the matter. A reputable author, Michael Crichton argues the negative side of patenting genes in Patenting Life. While resident scholar of American Enterprise Institute John Calfee’s article Decoding the Use of Gene Patents justifies the use of patents on genes. Crichton and Calfee do not see eye to eye on the matter when it comes multiple issues to include but not limited to the standard in which the Patent Trademark Office (PTO) holds those who obtain…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many current legal and ethical issues in bioengineering and biotechnology including athletic and cognitive enhancements, stem cell research, cloning, genetic engineering, and genetically modified organisms. Biotechnology is “the manipulation of biological systems and organisms through technological means”(p. 471). There is tension between valuing liberty to pursue happiness of biotechnologies, and the potential negative outcomes of these technologies. Bioengineering, is the construction of machines to alter or supplement organisms.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eugenics Ethical Issues

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the Eugenics program had many issues, both technical and ethical. The basis of the Eugenics program - that an individual’s life can be seen as “a burden” and not worth society’s resources - brings up multiple moral arguments. Who is the judge of whether a life is more valuable than another? Does this not give government workers and referrers the jurisdiction to play God? Inherently, this program had a multitude of factors that were not taken into account. One issue is the measurements used to quantify whether a person should have the right to reproduce or not. The qualifications were too unclear, and a range of reasons were used, from IQ tests, mental illness, handicaps, and even sexual promiscuity. Moreover, while the program was active, the state did not clarify who should make the final decisions. Unlike most states, in which medical professionals mainly acted as the final word, North Carolina allowed social workers, medical professionals, teachers, and even neighbors to have a say in who could possibly be sterilized. Many of these individuals reported unsuspecting…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Biomedical Ethics

    • 2856 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay revolved around many arguments, but mostly two main pro-life arguments. One includes the argument that it is wrong to kill a human being. A fetus is a human being, therefore it is wrong to kill a fetus. Abortion is the killing of a fetus, therefore abortion is wrong. Another argument involved is the argument that all human beings have a right to life. All fetuses are human beings. Killing a being with a right to life is wrong; therefore it is wrong to kill a fetus. Abortion is the killing of a fetus, therefore abortion is wrong. Through her destructive argument she is attempting to establish that even if the fetus is seen as a human being, it does not automatically have a right to use to body of a woman, and thus does not necessarily have a right to life.…

    • 2856 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, the prospect of stopping the transmission of heritable diseases increases. With the use of modern technology, expecting parents can now be prescreened in order to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Parents who choose to use in vitro fertilization are able to choose embryos that are free of disease due to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Additionally, parents can be provided with information on their unborn child with the use of prenatal genetic testing. Some individuals view modern genetic technology as eugenic; however, this biggest difference between eugenics now and eugenics during the 1900s is consent. Today individuals pursue genetic testing by choice and policies on ethics and consent prevent reoccurrences of the immoral endeavors within the field of…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Enhancement drugs

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Now that I’ve declared the unnaturalness of the idea of brain enhancement, I’d like to address the society this would create. If this enhancement were to be legalized, initially it would become an option. Those who do take it will excel and…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a world where autism and downs syndrome are a thing of the past, and where there is no shortage on food for anybody. Over the years mankind has developed and improved technology to save more and more lives through the manipulation of the DNA that makes up all living organisms. However, there are those who oppose this approach. Despite the risks and ethical concerns, genetic engineering holds the potential to benefit humanity through both direct and indirect means.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays