Hugo Gaverump Speech Analysis

Many believe that children in their infancy are supposed to be concern about their own small problems. They are not supposed to worry about politics or other grown up matters. Venezuelan children are the exception to that belief. I am a Venezuelan who grew up knowing and caring about my country’s politics. I was always aware of all the scandals and new ideas the president was part of. How could I not be? My mother, who worked in Venezuela’s biggest oil industry, was one of the many he fired on live TV. I was only five at the time, but I was very much aware of all the pain and distress he caused in my whole family. Slowly, as I grew up, I started paying more and more attention to the strange character Hugo Chavez was. The way of his speech,
How they change their entire speech in their benefit. They want the people to believe them and to keep supporting them not matter what. In order to do that, they need to distract their audience from the real issue. They play the victim/enemy game. They portrait themselves as the victim and picture an imaginary enemy. The Venezuelan journalist, broadcaster and TV host, Roberto Giusti describes both men on his column for El Universal as “consummate showmen” and how, with the ability to play with their audience’s emotions, they grab a bunch of lies and pin the people’s issues on an unrealistic enemy (Giusti). That way the audience knows who to blame with their issues, and perceive Trump and Chavez as some sort of savior. The Venezuelan, Andres Miguel Rondon, an economist who now resides in Madrid due to the current situation in Venezuela, describes both men as populist. He says that that is the recipe of populism “Tell the wounded you know how they feel. That you found the bad guys. Label them: the minorities, the politicians, the businessmen. Caricature them.” (Rondon). That is what Chavez and Trump are after. They want to blame someone for all the issues in the country. In Trump’s case; illegal immigration on the Mexicans and terrorism on Muslims. In Chavez’s case; poverty on the rich and lack of work or food also on the