Origins and Historical Influences on Human Resource Development: A Global Perspective MEERA ALAGARAJA LARRY M. DOOLEY Texas A&M University
A comprehensive review of literature on the origins and historical influences on human resource development reveals that much of its development is attributed to Western (predominantly U.S.) thought and perspectives. This study is an effort to begin exploring significant contributions from a global perspective—including those that are primarily non-Western. To do so, this article identifies and examines key non-Western contributions to the field of human resource development. There is an ever-growing pool of foundational knowledge in the human resource development field. However, it appears only a modest body of literature has been written on historical influences from non-Western perspectives to the field. It is the premise of this article that inclusiveness of other cultural contributions will facilitate a greater understanding of human resource development’s development as a relatively new body of knowledge. This article is a reflective study outlining the history of human development of both Western and nonWestern perspectives. Keywords: origins and historical influences; global perspectives; foundations of human resource development
As with the debate surrounding the definitions for human resource development (HRD) (McLean & McLean, 2001; Weinberger, 1998), the historical timeline for HRD means different things to different people. The concept and ways of defining it has been a source of challenge to all associated with the field. The challenging nature of the concept of HRD is reflected by the way it seeks to describe the scope and meaning as well as framework to organize multiple contributions to HRD theory and practice (Swanson & Holton, The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful feedback of Susan A. Lynham, Texas A&M University, on previous versions of this article, which contributed to its improvement. Human Resource Development Review Vol. 2, No. 1 March 2003 82-96 DOI: 10.1177/1534484303251170 © 2003 Sage Publications
Downloaded from hrd.sagepub.com at INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECH on August 30, 2011
Alagaraja, Dooley / ORIGINS AND HISTORICAL INFLUENCES ON HRD
2001). The diverse nature of HRD allows it to seek differing pivotal points in history to explain its emergence as an interdisciplinary field. The authors contend that HRD scholars and practitioners should view the origins and historical influences of HRD from a global perspective. The acceptance of this global perspective enhances applicability and the use of HRD foundational concepts in different countries and regions. This article proposes a framework to identify and encapsulate simultaneous events that occurred in different parts of the world to improve our understanding of HRD and trace the early influences on its foundational concepts.
Purpose of the Study
Foundational contributions to HRD from a global perspective allow for “application in diverse cultures and values that pertain to different geographical locations” (Lee, 2001). However, from a review of literature on the historical influences on HRD, it appears that very little attention has been paid to contributions that are primarily non-Western. According to Nadler and Nadler (1990), the earliest forms of HRD date to ancient times, but changes during those times were comparatively insignificant when viewed from an overall view of the field as it is today. DeSimone and Harris (1998) traced the origins of HRD to the early apprenticeship training program, early vocational education programs, and early factory schools. According to Gilley and Eggland (1989), the earliest forms of training were provided by the apprenticeship program in Colonial America. During this period, the workplace was not seen as a primary environment for human learning (p. 8). Lee and Stead (1998) traced the growth of HRD in the United...
References: Calvin, H. W. (1983). The throwing Madonna—Essays on the brain. New York: McGraw-Hill. Clark, D. (1999). A time capsule of training and learning. Retrieved from www.nwlink.com/ ~donclark/hrd/history/history.html Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G (2001). Organization development and change (7th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern College Publishing. DeSimone, R. L., & Harris, D. M. (1998). Human resource development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College. Durant, W., & Durant, A. (1968). The lessons of history. NewYork: Simon and Schuster. Elliott, C. (1998). Human resource development in the U.K.—A review of the literature. In R. J. Toracco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 1998 conference proceedings (p. 536-543). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development. Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds—An anatomy of leadership. New York: Basic Books. Gilley, J. W., & Eggland, S. A. (1989). Principles of human resource development. Cambridge, MA: Perseus. Harada, K. (1998). The Japanese human resource development system. In R. J. Toracco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 1998 conference proceedings (pp. 91-97). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development. Hilton, B., & McLean, G. N. (1997). The status of human resource development in French companies. In R. J. Toracco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 1997 Conference proceedings (pp. 694-701). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development. Lee, M. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 327341. Lee, M., & Stead, V. (1998). Human resource development in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3(9), 297-308. Lynham, S. (1995). Embracing the humanism in Africa in the practice and thought of human resource development. In E. F. Holton (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 1995 conference proceedings (pp. 23-25). St. Louis, MO: Academy of Human Resource Development.
Downloaded from hrd.sagepub.com at INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECH on August 30, 2011
Human Resource Development Review / March 2003
McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. (2001). If we can’t define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context? Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 75-94, 313-326. Musa, S. R., & McLean, G. N. (2002). Islamic perspectives on globalization and implications for HRD. In T. M. Egan & S. A. Lynham (Eds.), Academy of Human Resource Development 2002 Conference proceedings (pp. 209-216). Honolulu, HI: Academy of Human Resource Development. Nadler, L. (1984). The handbook of human resource development. New York: John Wiley. Nadler, L., & Nadler, Z. (Eds.). (1990) The handbook of human resource development (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley. Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Philosophy and core beliefs in human resource development: A journey for the profession and its professionals. In W. E. A. Ruona & G. Roth (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of human resource development, advances in developing human resources (No. 7, pp. 127). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Schwartz, P., & Layden, P. (1997). The long boom: A history of the future, 1980-2020. Retrieved from www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.07/longboom.html Shaw, H. W., & Craig, R. L. (1994, May). The coming of age of workplace learning: A time line. Training & Development, S5-S12. Swanson, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Origins of contemporary human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 3(2), 120-121. Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Toynbee, A. (1976). Mankind and mother earth—A narrative history of the world. New York: Oxford University Press. Weinberger, L. (1998). Commonly held theories of human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 1(1), 75-94.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document