Preview

Hp Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hp Case
. Over the time covered here, did Hewlett-Packards board of directors fulfill its duties to the company’s share owners? Explain how it met or did not meet basic duties.
He did not fulfill his duties to the company. The board directors let a few influence their decisions. They did not take their decisions based solely on what was best for the company and their shareholders. It became a war between board members for control.
2. What different perspectives on the role of the board are revealed in this story?
The role of the board is to balance, mediate, and reconcile the competing powers and interests of owners and managers. The board took it role of overseeing the interest of the owners and the profitability of the company very seriously when they vote to fire Fiorina. The board realized that is was important for the company to have as CEO someone who could move faster than her to recruit and retain talent, boost revenues and increase profits.
3. Was Carly Fiorina treated fairly by the board? Why or why not?
In a way CEO Ms. Fiorina was not treaty fairly by the board. The constant leak of the information serves as proof on the unethical behavior of board’s members. However, Ms. Fiorina’s centralized management policy made that almost every decision went through her. She resisted efforts by board members to enter into the management process. I am not excusing the board directors’ actions, but Ms. Fiorina’s policies and personality had turned the board into an armed camp, engraved with paranoia and divided against itself.
4. Were the leak investigations overseen by Patricia Dunn useful and important? Were they ethical?
The leak of information that Patricia Dunn was not pursuing was not useful or important. However, the leak involved an ethical concern.
5. Should George Keyworth have been asked to resign? Why or why not?
Yes he should never had discuss with the media information that he was not authorized to discuss, even more after there were suspicions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

     The CEO, was making decisions that affected the company, but didn’t include no one else in the decision.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What were the three reasons that Nixon gave for refusing to turn over the White House tapes?…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    many people thought that it was unfair that Nixon just escaped his criminal charges. As a result…

    • 831 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    - Scott Bronstein, Joe Johns, and Rahel Solomon, CNN Special Investigations Unit January 3, 2013Congressional ethics investigators could soon be silenced…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    WorldCom’s Board of Directors were inactive, not knowledgeable, and inexperienced. A Board of Directors that is active, involved, and knowledgeable of the organization is an important factor of an effective control system. In addition, they were solely paid based on the appreciation of the company’s stock, therefore with their approvals of the many acquisitions, this allowed them to grow and hence a larger compensation. This practice focused on the growth rather than the best interest of the company.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nickel and Dimed

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After reading Nickel and Dimed and reviewing the NASW Code of Ethics I found a few parts of the code of ethics Ehrenreich did not follow. I believe she was in breach of privacy and confidentiality, dishonesty, fraud, and deception, and integrity.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    04.03 The Decision

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The factors that most influenced my decision were the irresponsibility with concealing the identities of the interviewees in the school article, as well as the criticism of student parents. The people in the interviews were promised to have their identities concealed and were under that impression when conduction the interview. The principle was protecting these people and when he realized that the published paper revealed their names, he pulled it immediately.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Has Patricia acted recklessly, dishonestly, and failed to exercise and discharge her duties for a proper purpose and in the best interests of SEPL?…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    6uytuk

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) Bill Young believes that because his employees were not responsible for the 9/11 attacks, they…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nixon, determined to fight this conspiracy of leakers, resolved to leak documents himself. He was sure that he could distract the public from his own secrets and crimes by exposing dark secrets from the past. “The Nixon administration, in short, tried to restore Americans’ faith in the government and the ‘infallibility’ of the presidency by proving the fallibility and dishonesty of previous presidents.” (157)…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zinn believes even after the Watergate scandal ended, corruption in the government still remained. He quotes a French newspaper: “the elimination of Mr. Richard Nixon leaves intact all the mechanisms and all the face values which permitted the Watergate scandal” (Zinn 545). He explains that the House Committee blamed Nixon’s faults personally, but not the corruption in the government which enabled the scandal. Therefore, the power of the President to take any action preserving national security and to keep communications confidential remained (Zinn…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Board of Directors

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I would make the board of directors responsible for the hiring and firing of the CEO and top management. This is an important role and must be mandated from the board of directors. Keeping the right CEO in position and keeping top management in place is extremely important (Wheelen, p. 45).…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PR Communication Memo

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Release to the public the resignation of Bob Thompson and the investigation from the U.S.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generally, the board of directors are responsible for the following duties: 1) duty of care – duty to make/delegate decisions in an informed way; 2) duty of loyalty – duty to advance corporate over personal interests; 3) duty of good faith – duty to be faithful and devoted to the interests of the corporation and its shareholders; 4) duty not to “waste” – duty to avoid deliberate destruction of shareholder value. There is no reason to believe that the duties of Vector’s board should be any different. The major conflict between Vector’s board and its president centers on President Wiegert’s management style, belief of excessive spending and his deceitfulness towards the board members and potential investors. Although President Wiegert’s management style was not initially noticed as a concern, it was brought to the board’s attention by the finance VP, Don Johnson, but he failed to receive any support. Johnson had observed the president not giving employees the “freedom to be effective” and focusing more efforts on profit and promotion instead of engineering and production. The board would finally acknowledge this was a rather large issue two years later. There were several instances where the board questioned the president’s misuse of company expenses but had a difficult time producing evidence of any wrong doing. The amount of excessive spending that the president was responsible for was noticed as a problem but no action was taken. The board members also voiced concern about the over exaggerated “fraudulent” business plan that President Wiegart was using to raise money for Vector. Wiegart was not only losing the trust of his board members and employees but also his potential investors. Another problem, not mentioned in the case, was the board members themselves. They were all selected by the founder and president of the corporation, with the exception of Baduraman Dorpi (he was appointed by the Indonesian investor per the purchase agreement). The board…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In general, the board of directors is a group of elected or appointed members to oversee activities of a company or organization. The board of directors has a fiduciary duty to grow the long-term success of the corporation for the benefit of shareholder, and sometimes for debt holders. The basic fiduciary duty includes: 1) duty of care -duty to make/delegate decision in an informed way; 2) duty of loyalty -duty to advance corporate over personal interests; 3) duty of good faith-duty to be faithful and devoted to the interest of the corporation and its shareholders; 4) duty not to “waste” -duty to avoid deliberate destruction of shareholder value. Generally, the board of directors performs major detail functions as below: 1) provide continuity for the organization; 2) select and appoint a chief executive; 3) govern the organization by broad policies and objectives; 4) acquire sufficient resources for the organization’s operations and to finance the products and services adequately; 5) account to the public for the products and services of the organization and expenditures. The board is corporate governance of the company, which is significant for…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays