In this essay I will be analysing and discussing how Winston Churchill manipulates features and functions of spoken language to achieve specific outcomes in different situations and how speech and interaction patterns vary with his different contexts. In Churchill’s speeches, he uses language to create a sense of unity and motivation while subtly adding some words of wisdom and witty phrases.
Churchill’s short quotes have a very contrasting tone to his public speeches. His short quotes mainly have witty catchphrases and are said in a jokingly manner while his public speeches are more formal. Churchill’s public speeches present him as a sophisticated and motivational character.
During wartime, the ability to show passion and to boost the morale of an audience is of great importance. Churchill shows throughout his speeches that he has this ability when he uses inclusive language to create a rapport with his audience. ‘We have before us’ indicates a situation, but that ‘we’ have not yet got there. The situation may be overpowering for any single man, but because of Churchill’s use of inclusive language it is a situation that can be handled together. The more people who join the war effort the lesser the burden has to be for each man, woman and child. ‘Our cause’, once again reiterates the feeling of an equally shared burden. Most noticeably in Churchill’s Finest Hour speech he uses an immense amount of inclusive language.
The patriotism shown by Churchill in all of his speeches is strong and motivational and satisfying for his audience. ‘Superior quality of our ships’, additionally in most of his speeches he uses the great power of the British Empire as a compelling argument for both the World Wars. ‘Battle of Britain’, Churchill called part of the war which is another satisfying factor. This gives the British citizens another thing to be grateful about because the ‘home field advantage’ is now theirs.
Churchill’s acknowledgement of just how important religion can be is vital. Referring to religion in speech can be risky as words can be deemed offensive if not chosen wisely. But if words are chosen wisely it can be used to captivate the audience and make remarkable and powerful phrases, particularly as people at the time had strong Christian beliefs. At a time of conflict, religion can be used to connect with the audience as religion is something to follow. He depicts Britain as a ‘Christian civilisation’. This is not only stirring, patriotic and prejudiced for the audience but it has a powerful contradiction of irony. This is due to the fact that protestant Christianity did not originate from England, but Germany.
Verbal propaganda, something Churchill had the ability to use including statements about the British Empire emotionally and intuitively drove the British population to participate in the war effort. ‘The British Empire and its Commonwealth countries will last a thousand years’, not only is this statement decisive but it is also a very inspiring comment for the audience. This was key to his speech as it turned the House of Commons to his side.
A characteristic that Churchill took precise advantage of was his wide use of superlatives. ‘Their finest hour’ not only gives a legacy to the citizens of Britain but there is something to be proud of in ‘finest’ as your can’t get better than the finest. ‘Superior quality’ reiterates that and these superlatives reinforce Churchill’s statements and lifts morale.
The British Empire was by far the most powerful contributing aspect that Britain could give to the war effort. Churchill emphasizes this by saying the three types of fight ‘we will fight them by sea, land and air’ in order of strongest first. ‘Nearly everything has been foreseen’ implies that Churchill can predict the future and the outcome is already known to him but has left doubt by saying nearly. But for some people this was all they needed to be encouraged to sign up to join the war effort.
Another of Churchill’s characteristics is the way he explains dismal and complex situations in a simple way that it seems that all is fine. The core of the sentence, ‘if we can stand up to him…may be free… and the life of the world may move into broad sunlit uplands’ is happiness as this draws his audience’s attention form the word ‘if’.
Churchill’s further understanding of rhetoric language and questions gives his audience a chance to think about them rather than being ‘force fed’ with information. ‘You ask, what is our aim?’ is an example of this. He pauses for a while, which gives his audience time to think about this. ‘Our aim is victory’ Churchill then says to his audience as if the answer was obvious.
Churchill retained many characteristics and abilities when performing his speeches and I believe that Churchill has put a new meaning to morale-boosting speeches as well as gaining the legacy of one of the most powerful and influential British leader of all time. And the fact that he became Prime Minister after his failure at Gallipoli makes his legacy even more respectful.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
All great speeches evoke emotions and provoke thought in order to engage their audience. Through rhetorical treatment of human aspirations and beliefs speakers are able to ignite thought, stir emotions and in some cases even inspire their audiences to take action. This concept is evident in Paul Keating’s speech ‘Funeral For An Unknown Soldier’ (1993) and even more so in Noel Pearson’s speech ‘An Australian History For All Of Us’ (1996). The following interpretation of these two prescribed speeches will show how each speaker has used rhetorical devices to inspire emotion, thought and action but firstly it is important to know the context of these speeches in order to understand the impact they have on their audiences.…
- 1369 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Winston Churchill was a talented man; he had a very interesting early life with his family and education. His careers were short from going to military to a civilian world to the government. He ended his career with a pretty good end until he started getting ill. The British Prime Minister had a very long and eventful life full of adventure.…
- 1168 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Keegan, John "Winston Churchill." 13 Apr. 1998. 14 Jan. 2013. "Winston Churchill." 14 Jan. 2013 www.bbc.co.uk. "Winston Churchill." www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk. 14 Jan. 2013. .…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Winston Churchill starts out his speech addressing the venue and the people who invited him to speak. He begins to foreshadow the possibilities of nuclear destruction and the immaturity of using such forces. He then falls into an outline of the countries involved in the war and his interpretation of their thoughts of everything going on. Commonwealth is a continuous topic throughout the address and is explained and used in multiple examples. Churchill also addresses the tragedies of war and the harmful affects it has on nations and their people. He concludes his speech with a call for action. He states that banding together will result in a clear future for generations to come.…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1.) Henry’s opening lines allow him to suggest the importance of patriotism as he say “no man thinks more highly than I do of patriotism.” With caution not to spike anybody with opposing views, he inserts that “different men often see the same subject in different lights.” He does this first and foremost in his speech to show his audience that he respect and values those opinion.…
- 705 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Spoken Language in my opinion follows a different set of rules to written language in this essay I am going to explore the ways spoken language is used by television interviewers. I will be using the political chat show This Week as an example of the spoken language on TV chat shows. This Week is a political and current affairs chat show broadcasted every Thursday night on BBC one. The show is presented by former editor of the Sunday Times Andrew Neil and is accompanied every week by ex Conservative Party Member Michael Portillo.…
- 1446 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
More than seventy years have passed since the battles have ended, but World War II continues to resonate in the world today. After Poland, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France fell one by one under Nazi control, the sole territory standing in between German political leader Adolf Hitler and his full control over Europe was Britain. At the time, the late British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who had only been Prime Minister for six weeks, led his people into battle (International Business). In this paper, I will examine Winston Churchill’s This Was Their Finest Hour speech he gave in the House of Commons on June 18, 1940 as invasion threatened Britain. Historians have claimed this speech to be “one of the greatest speeches ever delivered in the English language” (International Business) as it aided to inspire Britain to its eventual victory. Winston Churchill excelled as a communicator which benefitted him greatly as a World leader, for how can one lead if one cannot communicate to, and with, the people? The politician was a master orator who, in recent years, has been a model for rhetoricians in regards to his “rhetorical ability to dismantle the traditional barriers between political parties and unite them in one cause during wartime, his ability to relieve fear and anxiety amongst people, and his ability to inspire and convince them to fight with resolution” (Hyde, 1). By exploring ideas and concepts from communication approaches, such as Aristotle’s “modes of proof” (pathos, logos, and ethos), the sociological perspective, and the psychological perspective, I will demonstrate how Winston Churchill’s rhetoric kept Britain’s courage alive during WWII.…
- 2607 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
Thatcher Eulogy Revisions At times of tension, a country requires a leader who will not only protect his country men but work will other leaders to dissolve the tension. In her eulogy to the American public (June 11, 2004), Margaret Thatcher -- the former prime minister of Great Britain-- honors former United States President Ronald Reagan for his success as president. Thatcher’s appeals to pathos and descriptive diction lionizes Reagan for his success as a president, global leader and beloved friend. Thatcher’s appeals to pathos portrays Reagan as a significant patriotic figure to the American public.…
- 312 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
On May 10, 1940, Winston Churchill became British Prime Minister. On May 13, he presented his angle on acquiring victory “at all costs”, and some contend that this “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat speech is what made his career. This speech was given by Churchill on his entrance into the House of Commons with the presence of the outgoing prime minister. There has been controversy surrounding his intense speech regarding the multiple ultra-nationalistic statements he makes, however in this quote, he poses the effective idea that victory must be attained at all costs, even in spite of “terror”, and it is apparent that his intentions regarding his speech are to let the people of Great Britain know that he is dedicated to serving his country and…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Kacee Bailey Public speaking 10/06/10 Martin Luther King Forum 1. What oratorical devices does Dr. King use to add vitality and force to his speech? 2. Do you think that Dr. King's dream has become a reality? Why or why not? 3. What changes could you make in your life to help Dr. King's dream become a reality at SWHS? 1. He pause a lot and he repeats himself. The way he talks is also very enticing it makes you want to pay attention. 2. Yes, We are a lot less segregated and there are many minority's in schools and there is no more separation for schools and public places. So I feel that Dr. Kings dreams ave very much come true. although in some states there is still racism. 3. I think that even though there is less segregation and less racism. People still look down to others. So a change we could make is…
- 659 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Winston Churchill was very charismatic, and as a result of that had great people-skills and became very popular with the British affected by the bombs dropped during WWII. He was also very smart and intelligent, as many people who suffer from depression are. He had many great characteristics that helped Great Britain win the war against the Nazis- great military and political skills, high ambition, and many other things. Without his leadership, Britain might have not beaten the Nazis.…
- 397 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Considering the mention of Winston Churchill, in the text it says, ”You ask, what is our policy? I say it is to wage war by land, sea, and air. War with all our might and with all the strength God has given us, and to wage war against a monstrous tyranny never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy”(Churchill 10). This shows that Churchill is in the conflict of war and he is given the choice of the many responses to conflict; he decides to go with a positive attitude. He believes that if they don’t fight then it will end…
- 1097 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
He achieved this through his utilization of logos and pathos. When Chamberlain said “If out of the struggle we again re-establish in the world the rules of good faith and the renunciation of force, why then even the sacrifices that will be entailed upon us will find their fullest justification”, he gives good moral reasons why the British must enter the conflict against the Nazi’s. He describes the Nazi’s again by using logos and pathos, saying, “As long as that Government exists and pursues the methods it has so persistently followed during the last two years, there will be no peace in Europe. We shall merely pass from one crisis to another, and see one country after another attacked by methods which have now become familiar to us in their sickening technique”. He explains that the effect of letting the German people do as they please is that Europe will be plunged into years of struggle, with violence and plagues of death being the toll. Chamberlain needed the emotional support of his citizens. He used pathos in this address to win their trust. He gains his audience back by using pathos and reminding them of grim times, such as World War One, it is still fresh in nearly every ones minds. Chamberlain says, “The thoughts of many of us must at this moment inevitably be turning back to 1914, and to a…
- 564 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Queen Elizabeth I used rhetorical strategies and upright style choices to convey her message. When Queen Elizabeth gave her speech to the English troops who were in preparation for an attack by the Spanish Armada, she revealed her awareness of the crucial position the soldiers were in and the world as well. In her speech, she is exhorting her troops to face the battle with courage and determination and she does that by taking her place as the speaker to interact with the audience and defining her point. Her point was to support her troops and specify the importance of her safety and commitment for the people of the kingdom. The way she uses herself in context, she stood for the whole nation and it proposes the nobility of the troops who would feel obligated as gentlemen to defend their queen. Also, the queen reinforces her image by stating how she is looked upon as a weak and feeble woman however; she compares herself to a fierce and courageous king. By doing so, she persuades the audience that she is strong, loyal, and glorious. With these references, she gives her persona and she expresses her understanding of the power and prominence that the soldiers have among the world. Furthermore, Elizabeth points out that with their amity, they will be rewarded and that strengthens them because that shows her trust and belief, which projects her persona as well. The way she uses herself in context, she stood for the whole nation and it proposes the nobility of the troops who would feel obligated as gentlemen to defend their queen. Also, the queen reinforces her image by stating how she is looked upon as a weak and feeble woman however; she compares herself to a fierce and courageous king.…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays