Preview

How to Evaluate an Rfp of Adt System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How to Evaluate an Rfp of Adt System
You are part of the five-member team responsible for selecting the new admission/discharge/transfer (ADT)/MPI for your facility. You are replacing an existing MPI that no longer meets the needs of your organization. Even more important, in 18 months the MPI will no longer be supported by your vendor. The functional requirements and the request for proposal have been developed. The RFP is due back from the vendors in 1 week. Your facility wants to make the decision about which system to choose within 3 months. Your assignment is to evaluate the RFP’s returned and to develop a plan to guide the team in the evaluation and selection of the final system. Your plan should answer these questions:

a) What process(es) will be used to evaluate systems?

The processes to evaluate an ADT system are as follows:-

1. Determine who will be involved in the detailed evaluation and communicate the role and expectations. These should include the project team and any other stakeholders as may be appropriate. The evaluation process will take time, ensure the individuals selected have been properly briefed, and the time commitments clearly understood.
2. Circulate functional requirements and related copies of the proposal to the immediate project team or those closely involved in evaluating the proposal;
3. Give clear directions on how to proceed and the related timetable;
4. Review and score the functional fit of each proposal, depending on the number and breadth of the proposals, these might have to be allocated to different team members. If so, ensure the evaluation method is well defined to get consistent results; Examples of the RFP evaluation factors of ADT project between vendors are listed as follows:-
• Vendor’s ability to meet the organization’s must-have requirements;
• Proposed benefits to the organization;
• Cost;
• Ease of implementation;
• Ease of self-customization;
• Ease of use;
• Other value added benefits from the vendor;
• The vendor’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Xacc/210 Final Project

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this stage the project team will determine what the end-user requirements will be. To come to these conclusions the project team will consult with client focus groups. This provides the project team with an idea of what is needed and expected for the end results of the product. At which point the project team will document all findings and review and approved by the client and management before moving on to the next stage.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    dss 001

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Proposer must address ALL Mandatory Requirements section items and provide, in sequence, the information and documentation as required (referenced with the associated item references). The RFP Coordinator will review all general…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. How should your firm evaluate or assess if you should respond to the RFP?…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    •Describe the types of evaluations you would include in your evaluation plan and how each would serve to analyze various processes or intended outcomes in 700 to 1,050 words.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Firm is a security services provider. Our clients included organizations of various sizes, but most clients are state and federal government agencies that must demonstrate compliance with specific security-related regulations. Our firm was founded 2002, as a small corporation with only four employees. At that time, the firm’s focus was to provide database performance tuning and security services, including assessments, penetration tests, policy creation, and regulatory compliance assistance. The firm’s current annual gross sales are currently million in U.S. dollars.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It Capstone

    • 39442 Words
    • 158 Pages

    [pic] STATE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INFORMATION SECURITY ASSESSMENT SERVICES (ISAS) RFP NUMBER: 427.04-107-08 |CONTENTS | |SECTION | | |1 |INTRODUCTION | |2 |RFP SCHEDULE OF EVENTS | |3 |PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS | |4 |GENERAL REQUIREMENTS & CONTRACTING INFORMATION | |5 |PROPOSAL EVALUATION & CONTRACT AWARD | | | |RFP ATTACHMENTS: | | |6.1 |Pro Forma Contract | | | |Contract Attachment A: Attestation Re Personnel Used in Contract Performance | | | |Contract Attachment B: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) | | | |Contract Attachment C:…

    • 39442 Words
    • 158 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The discussion of implementation of changes and improvements in the project whether specific improvements or process changes are required to ensure that all important aspects of the business are accounted is performed under the Evaluation Phase. The meeting held with business objective to collect and cleanse the data to ensure the quality of data.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    proj 587

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is not a complete project proposal or even a complete status report. You are making a specific proposal to management of a “Project Portfolio Evaluation and Selection Process”.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (a) There are typically six assessment methods that we can chose to employ within your role. These are listed below along with examples of when and how they could be implemented:…

    • 1296 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Info

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Peer and Self Evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, on each of the performance criteria below. Use the rating scale of three equals above average, two equals average, and one equals below average.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Document 1

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Peer and self-evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, according to each of the performance criterion below.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluation and Word Count

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. their own application of evaluation processes, working with others and their use of data and other feedback for…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facilitating Change

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. Identify risks and benefits of the project while meeting thedeadlines set by members of the team…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carry out assessments in accordance with the awarding organisation’s requirements in a fair and objective manner;…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peer Evaluation

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You are responsible for evaluating each member (other than yourself) of your work group. Please do what the instructions request.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays