Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

How the Economy Came to Be Dominated by Giant Trusts

Satisfactory Essays
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How the Economy Came to Be Dominated by Giant Trusts
1. Describe how the economy came to be dominated by giant trusts, such as those headed by Carnegie and Rockefeller in the steel and oil industries, and the growing class conflict it precipitated.

Andrew Carnegie was the creator of Carnegie steel. Carnegie used vertical integration. This meant buying all the steps needed for production. This made production cost cheaper so profit higher. John D. Rockerfeller founded standard Oil and was a philanthropist who contributed to a lot of research in field like education medicine and science. He was the first American businesses trust. With men like these people getting richer, the poor became poorer.

2. Describe how new technological inventions fueled new industries and why American manufacturers increasingly turned toward the mass production of standardized goods.
There were a lot of cheap resources like oil coal and gas. There was also a lot of western land. The industrial transformation was also caused by a lot of new technologies. These include the telegraph and telephone. Innovations like electricity also caused this. Transportation like the railroad also did this. All of these things made it so companies could produce things faster.
3. Indicate how industrialists and their intellectual and religious supporters attempted to explain and justify great wealth, and increasing class division through natural law and the Gospel of Wealth.

They believed in a survival of the fittest idea. They thought that the rich were fit to live in a society based on social Darwinism. This meant everybody had to compete to get to the top.

4. Explain why the South was generally excluded from American industrial development and remained in a Third World economic subservience to the North.

Industurlization was based on the idea of lots of natural resources and land. The south was a very established rural area. The resources had mostly been used and there wasn’t a lot of land left for factories.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    13. How did mass production change the American economy? What items were the first to be mass produced in the…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late nineteenth century rapid industrialization paved the way for extreme economical wealth of many business. In accordance with the overflowing wealth in the nineteenth century many individuals held similar but yet contrasting views toward the wealth that was created in the United States. Among these individuals were Andrew Carnegie, Eugene V. Debs, and Horatio Alger.…

    • 555 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1900s, businesses were thriving and the competition to be the wealthiest was through the roof. Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller were two of the most important men in America. Carnegie was the leader of the Steel industry and Rockefeller was the leader of the oil. These two men despised the idea of the other. Carnegie always wanted to be the wealthiest and was always thinking of new ways to be wealthier than Rockefeller. Carnegie came to a point in his career where he would have to come to a decision on what type of business he would run. It depended on if he could become the dirty type of business man. Carnegie decided to hire a man named Henry Frick, and together, these men would make profits and reach goals Carnegie thought unimaginable. Through fierce competition, these three men shaped the future of American business.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1880’s, American industry grew due to many factors including “the emergence of a talented and often ruthless group of entrepreneurs” (Brinkley 396). According to those in favor of these entrepreneurs, these men worked hard, innovated technology and strategized competitively to transform the American economy; these “Captains of Industry,” such as Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J Pierpoint Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, used their wealth to help their communities and should be honored for their philanthropy. An advocate for these entrepreneurs is John S. Gordon. As a specialist of business and financial history, Gordon claims…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Why was the South slow to industrialize after the Civil War? How did industrialization affect the South? Pages 544 and 545…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rockefeller and Carnegie

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Let us first look at Mr. Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie was a mogul in the steel industry. Carnegie developed a system known as the vertical integration. This method basically cut out the ‘middle man'. Carnegie bought his own iron and coal mines (which were necessities in producing steel) because purchasing these materials from independent companies cost too much and was insufficient for Carnegie's empire. This hurt his competitors because they still had to pay for raw materials at much higher prices. Unlike Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller integrated his oil business from top to bottom. Rockefeller's system was considered a ‘horizontal' integration. This meant that he followed one product through all phases of the production process, i.e. Rockefeller had control over the oil from the moment it was drilled to the moment it was sold to the consumer. These systems helped both men in acquiring their fortunes.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weixin Luo 01/01/13 AP Government, P5 Mr Mansfield The Flaw The documentary movie “The Flaw” identified income inequality as the flaw which caused the financial crisis in America. The movie argued that the widening gap between the rich and the poor contributed to the credit boom as wealth was accumulated in the top 1% of the American population. I agreed with the analysis in the movie and the explanation by the famous economists and distressing house owners. As a result of capitalism, the unequal distribution of wealth led to the conclusion that the rich get richer. The wages did not grow proportionally with the increasing costs of living standard as promised, and the middle class started to invest money they did not have, which was encouraged…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Medici Family Outline

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1 .used their wealth not only to build more wealth but to build prestige and exercise power and influence as well.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    areas, Marxism was seen as a way to take wealth from the elites and spread it…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrialisation led to the development of factories. These factories employed many people thus many had easier ways of doing work and to top it off get something out of it in terms of money. With this money they could fend for their families back in rural areas by themselves buying food and clothes for them instead of them getting or making them from…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Britain , the 1688 Glorious Revolution was regarded as the “ turning point in…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism Vs Capitalism

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    New ideologies were introduced with long distance trading. Political geography was redefined along ethnic lines. The National banks, the creation of currency, media and the railroad system fostered the development of states and markets. The rapid growth of capitalism ushered in the industrial revolution. The development of factories, and the mass production of manufactured goods that happened in Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries, brought about the introduction of machinery that used steam power.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Stratification

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Differentiate between wealth, power, and prestige, and discuss how each is distributed in the United States.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 5 Study Guide

    • 5167 Words
    • 21 Pages

    One important aspect that changed the way goods were produced involves the location of the production of goods. People were moving away from the idea of cottage industry production (in-home production) and worked in factories because of the development of water-powered factories and mills. People were now working for bosses instead of their families and were going away from home.…

    • 5167 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics