D 271 TMA 30 ECA
Section A Media.
To what extent has the media ‘independently reported events since 9/11 ‘.
This essay critically explores the independence of the media in reporting events in the post 9/11 period. It particularly focuses on independence from the government and the military. The essay begins by exploring the claims of critics who suggest that professional journalistic practices such as over reliance on official sources and fear of lawsuits from powerful interests contribute to the manufacture of consent. For these reasons the mass media has become little more than propaganda instruments for a dominant elite. [Herman and Chomsky 1994, p19-23]. It then reviews recent conflicts to explore the extent to which this theory is based. In exploring these issues the essay endorses the view that the media post 9/11 became weapons of mass hysteria used by the State to create fear in the population rendering the population liable to manipulation. It also seeks to highlight a number of potential limitations to this position particularly in regard to unilateral reporting during conflicts and discussion around the Gilligan interview on the BBC broadcast.
Herman and Chomsky’s position is that the mass media are drawn into a relationship with powerful sources of information by economic necessity and reciprocity of interest. Drawing on the work of Mark Fishman [1986 p. 143] entitled Manufacturing the News, which claims ‘ In particular a news worker will recognize an official’s claim to knowledge , not merely as a claim , but as a credible, competent piece of knowledge. This amounts to a moral division of labour; officials have and give the facts, reporters merely get them ‘. Herman and Chomsky go on to say that the media may feel obligated to carry dubious stories and mute stories so as not to offend their sources and disturb close relationships with the military or the government.
The information given by the media tends to be selected and shaped in ways that support the world-views and interests of the people and organizations making the media text. This does not say that they are fiction but more to suggest what is often authoritatively presented as real and factual is constructed through a process of selection. [ Banks 2009]
The notion of media independence can be analysed in the context of how governments and the military can influence the ways in which news agendas are made. In his press article based on an interview with a female Captain in the army who is also a member of the media operations, Smith gives an insight into her partisan views with ‘ The British army needs the media on side ‘. She also states ‘ It is our voice to the people at home ‘ [ Smith 2005, personal conversation with author]. This is an example of how, in some instances, the government or military can influence or determine the ways in which news agendas are made.
The lack of apparent media independence is continued by Kellner. ‘ The lack of debate in the U.S. corporate broadcasting media points to an intensifying crisis of democracy in the United States. While the media are supposed to discuss issues of public importance and present a wide range of views, during the epoch of the War on Terror they have largely privileged Bush administration and Pentagon positions.’ [ Kellner 2007 p.12].
When examining the war on Iraq Kull et al also question media independence ‘ It also appears that the media cannot be necessarily be counted on to play the critical role of doggedly challenging the administration. The fact that viewers of some media outlets had far lower levels of misperception than did others suggests that not all were making the maximal effort to counter the potential for misperception.[ Kull et al 2004. p597].
This general argument informs the views of Mythen and Walklate when discussing the culture of fear that has been created within British society as a result of the terrorist threat. They argue that...
References: Gearty, C. Civil Liberties : Oxford University Press, Clarendon Law Series.
Mottram , R.  ‘Protecting the citizen in the twentieth-first century’ in Hennessy, P. [ed], The New Protective State: Government Intelligence and Terrorism , London: Continuum Publishing [ p46-51].
Porter, H.  ‘Why I told Parliament : you’ve failed us on Liberty’, The Observer , 9 March.
Saward, M.  ‘The State and civil liberties in the post 9/11 world’, in Dunleavy, P., Heffernan , R. Cowley, P. and Hay, C. [ eds], Developments in British Politics 8, Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan [ p212-8].
Please join StudyMode to read the full document