Preview

How Important Was Stalin’s Use of ‘Lenin’s Legacy’ in Explaining His Victory in the Power Struggle in the Years 1924 – 1929?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1030 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Important Was Stalin’s Use of ‘Lenin’s Legacy’ in Explaining His Victory in the Power Struggle in the Years 1924 – 1929?
How important was Stalin’s use of ‘Lenin’s Legacy’ in explaining his victory in the Power Struggle in the years 1924 – 1929? Stalin’s use of Lenin’s Legacy helped him majorly in winning the power struggle from 1924 to 1929.
Stalin used the legacy at Lenin’s funeral. He was firstly able to make the speech by making sure that Trotsky was not present at the funeral. Due to Trotsky’s absence Stalin was able to praise the work of Lenin, making out that he was going to carry on Lenin’s work, which gave him extra support from the public, due to the fact after Lenin’s death the entire nation was in mourning and believed that Lenin was a good man giving his all to make the USSR a better place. It also gave Stalin the chance to criticize his biggest rival, Trotsky who was not at the funeral to defend himself, or to make out to the public that he was the leading man; the one that Lenin believed was the best candidate to carry the USSR forward. Stalin also promised to continue Lenin’s road to communism by using NEP until it started to fail.
NEP was an economic policy brought in by Lenin as a temporary solution to the USSR’s financial problems which was causing famines and massive unemployment at the time. As NEP was only considered a temporary solution by Lenin, Stalin was able to support NEP whilst it was working and when it started to fail as a solution he wanted to get rid of it. This helped him to remove some rival candidates as it wasn’t going against Lenin, and the other candidates that continued to support NEP weren’t going with Lenin’s ideas as he would have removed it once it had stopped working.
The position’s given to Stalin by Lenin was also used to his advantage. He was made General Secretary by Lenin which allowed him to control recruitment into the party, so he was able to surround himself with loyal supporters, which made him able to create factions and increased his personal power. Stalin was also the Protector of Lenin, so he was able to prevent other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stalin's position as General Secretary proved to be very important in his seize of power for many reasons. One reason for this is that it gave him the ability to control party membership which was extremely beneficial as it meant he could bring people that supported him into the party and also he could kick out those who did not agree with his ideology. Another reason is that it allowed him to undermine his rivals’ power bases meaning he could sway the opinions of others into supporting him over the other competitors in the running for power.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main weaknesses of the left which benefitted Stalin majorly was Trotsky and his constant misjudge when it came to making decisions. Trotsky, being the leader of the left wing was an arrogant man who wasn’t trusted by his fellow party members due to his poor attitude towards the party, his late membership to the party and his control over the red army. Throughout his membership within the party he showed a lack of involvement and destroyed his reputation further when not attending Lenin’s funeral.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion Lenin’s actions in 1918 to 1924 were of more significance than those pre 1917 because his actions in these years brought about the real change that was triggered by the Revolution in 1917. Furthermore, a majority of logistics and planning was done by Trotsky while Lenin reaped the benefits. However, Lenin achieved great things in his years of power as there were important economic, political and social developments in Russia at this time that could not have been achieved without Lenin’s input. Lenin took over an empire that was breaking up, suffering from military defeat and in a state of economic and political crisis.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years before Lenin’s death and the years that followed. Stalin was seen to be in the weaker position than the seven other opponents, this being because he was doubted in his role in the revolution and therefore as his role of the leader of the party. I believe that the personalities of the contenders was significant in the power struggle but it was also several main factors that played a role in allowing Stalin to become victorious these being his ruthless personality and devious strategies which allowed him to tactfully defeat the others he saw as opponents. He accomplished this by manipulating his powerbase and ultimately emerging as the leader of the party in the year 1929, which thereby ended the struggle for leadership.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important reasons why Stalin won the power struggle is that he used his high positions in the Communist party and the power that came with it to his advantage. Several factors fall under this category. Firstly is how Stalin used his position as General Secretary, as well as jealousies between the leaders and Trotsky’s illness to stage-manage Lenin’s funeral. To the general public, it appeared that Stalin was very close to Lenin, and as a result should become his successor.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin held the position of General Secretary of the Communist Party from 1922 onwards, which was an incredibly powerful place to be, and aided him immensely during the power struggle. The role was predominantly bureaucratic and many people were unaware of the influence that Stalin held; being General Secretary, he could control membership of the party, which won him popularity with the peasants, whose social standing and benefits were raised by becoming party members. As the majority of the Soviet population consisted of peasants, this gave Stalin a solid base of support during the power struggle. This was emphasized by his other roles, for example he was Head of Workers and Peasants Inspectorate, and Peoples Commissar for Nationalities, both of which allowed Stalin to make connections all over the country in seemingly ‘low-level’ positions, meaning that he was able to fill the central committee with his supporters during important votes, effectively controlling the entire system to support his…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next contender and winner of the battle for power was Joseph Stalin. An underdog and one of the least likely looking people to win, Stalin played his cards well and to his advantage. Being a Bolshevik from the beginning supported the fact that Stalin was a loyal Bolshevik which was a strength of his…

    • 1061 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Stalin won because Trotsky lacked a power base”: How far does this statement explain why Stalin, rather than Trotsky, succeeded Lenin as leader of the Soviet State?…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is easier to quantify a historical figure’s achievements not by showing what he changed, but rather by showing what the world would be like if he had not been there. If Vladimir Lenin had not been born, there would be no Cold War, no Soviet Union and Russia might still be ruled by a Tsar. However, Lenin was not simply a catalyst in the many changes Russia faced; he was a most volatile reactant in the chemistry of Russian and world politics. Breaking the barrier between attaining both economic success and political achievement, Vladimir Lenin almost singlehandedly ended the Tsardom and brought the socialist “Bolshevik” party to power in Russia. Lenin’s unique experiences in his youth led him to his status as a revolutionary and ultimately changed Russia and the world. Lenin’s early life helped to shape his destiny as a revolutionary leader.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky & Stalin

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1921, Lenin’s health was delicate and fragile; he started suffering a series of strokes that in 1924 finally ended his life. In 1922 he “retired” from any business that had to do with the government. During this time he became more aware of the party’s weaknesses, and started to be conscious about the threat that Stalin supposed for not only the Bolsheviks, but for Russia’s future. Lenin wrote his “Letter to the Party Congress” in 1922, and alerted that Stalin was becoming too powerful and had to be removed immediately from his position. “That is why I suggest the comrades think about a way of removing Staling from that post and appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Stalin in having only one advantage, mainly, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite, and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc.” (Quote from Lenin’s Letter). January 21, 1924 Lenin dies, and a struggle for power between Stalin and Leon Trotsky takes place. Josep Stalin resulted as the victor, and for the next 30 years he would lead Russia towards a fast industrialization process that caused millions of deaths. Furthermore, it is accurate to say that Joseph Stalin’s rise was due to his skill and political planning.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rise of Stalin

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A primary factor that led to the rise of Stalin was due to the weakness of Leon Trotsky, who was one of the strongest competitors that Stalin faced in succeeding Lenin as leader of the Communist Party. However, there are actions taken by Trotsky that weakened himself as an opposition. For example, Trotsky believed in permanent revolution, and he sought to promote and incite revolutions all over the world. However, he failed to convince his fellow Party members of his idea of world revolution. In addition, Trotsky only had the most of his support from the Red Army that he was leading. Therefore, the dividing believe that Trotsky had of permanent revolution, which would result in wars and chaos, did not gain any support as members of the Communist Party was war-weary. Furthermore, since the major decisions was made by the Party members, the soldiers in the Red Army, who supports Trotsky, did not have any say to whom was to succeeding Lenin as leader of the Communist Party. Henceforth, Stalin was seen as a more suitable leader of the Communist Party.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many believe Stalin’s rise to power began when he met Vladimir Lenin. In 1921 Stalin helped plan the invasion of Georgia which was the source for his negative policies towards the country. In 1922 he was appointed general secretary of the Bolshevik party with the help of Lenin. The main reason for this was to make life harder for Trotsky. When he first met Lenin he showed enormous support for his ideas and for the party. Lenin didn’t like the policies which Stalin had towards Georgia. In 1922 Lenin suffered a stroke and was forced to briefly retire to Gorki, although he was still in charge. Stalin acted as Lenin’s connection with the outside world and he visited him a lot. But as Lenin’s condition grew worse, Stalin’s thirst for leadership began to bubble and he began showing signs of a dictator. After noticing Stalin’s rude behavior, addiction to power and ambition Lenin stated in his testament that Stalin should be removed from his title as general secretary and that if Stalin should inherit leadership it would be disastrous. Stalin went behind Lenin’s back and with the help of his new alliances with two men named Lev Kamenev and Grigory Zinoviev he was able to keep Lenin’s testament from getting to the Twelfth Party Congress in 1923.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons why Stalin’s opponents were unable to prevent him form becoming the leader of the USSR by 1929; the personality’s of the opponents being a hinting factor for themselves, Stalin’s cunning and sly ways to get what he wanted in the party, and Lenin’s testament not being publicly read out.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays