King was a strong leader and his great strength was his ability to inspire many people he reached out and spoke to .He was a superb and gifted orator and was extremely compelling. He conveys his thoughts and feelings as well as others about the injustices of segregation to national audiences. In this essay, I’m going to talk about “how far the leadership of king responsible for the gains ...” and how there were other factors that too promoted change and how king could be criticised. As I said before King was a compelling and captivating leader and orator, who appealed to black Christians in the southern states and could have been seen as the ideal speaker. He often broke the unjust laws of the de jure discrimination of the south. He provided the open minded with opportunities and hope. He did this by showing America not to judge people by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character. His speeches and acts in public were responsible for swinging public support behind the civil rights legislation of the mid 1960’s. King advocated peaceful protest throughout his life and in doing this he grasped a lot of media attention and public support. One his first peaceful protest he was involved in was the Montgomery Bus Boycott in when his leaderships and presidential skills came out. It demonstrated Martin Luther King’s leadership qualities and brought him to national attention, marking his emergence as a leading light within the civil rights movement. His contribution reinforced his philosophy of a non-violent approach to the achievement of change. This shows how his involvement and leadership helped and was responsible for gain in the civil right movement because of his success leadership and orator skills and his strong beliefs influenced and helped in his success.
Another peaceful protest that king was involved in/lead was the Birmingham Protest and the Washington march in 1963. Following the Albany movement of 1961-62 he knew he had to change...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document