How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for His Own Downfall?

Topics: Nicholas II of Russia, Russian Empire, Russia Pages: 4 (1510 words) Published: October 23, 2012
How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

In 1917 Tsar Nicholas II signed a deliration to abdicate from power; this was due to a number of long term and short term factors; some being of Nicolas II own problems and some being general problems that faced Nicholas II. When Tsar Nicholas II came to power many problems faced him, such as lack of industrial revolution, political problems, economical problems etc… Nicholas II was a very strong believer in autocracy and the belief that he had been made Tsar by God, however Nicholas was a very poor leader to the people of Russia, growing political problems and the war pushed Nicholas II to abdicate.

Tsar Nicholas II was a very poor leader for the people of Russia, he lacked leadership skills. His poor leadership qualities lead too many problems within Russia that were not dealt with efficiently. For example he did not trust the Duma, in 1906 the first Duma was introduced; after 72 days Nicholas dissolved the Duma as he did not believe in their policies and he did not trust them. This angered many people, Nicholas was not giving anyone a chance to speak and help him to change Russia. Nicholas poor leadership and traditional beliefs meant that there was little change in Russia, outside Russia many countries were thriving on industrialization where as Russia was still lacking behind. The new Western ways built growing political tensions; left wing oppositions were forming against the Tsar and waiting to over throw him. This long – term factor is seen as Nicholas II own problem for his downfall, his lack in leadership skills angered the country and people knew Nicholas could improve his leadership, but would not do so.

Russia was still an autocracy, this meant that the Tsar had complete power and his rules and beliefs could not be challenged. The autocracy system was growing old, people in Russia wanted westernization and democracy, however Nicholas II opposed these beliefs. After the events of...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • how far was theTsar Nicholas the second responsible for his own downfall? Essay
  • How Did Tsar Nicholas Ii Play a Role in His Own Downfall? Essay
  • Macbeth Was Responsible for His Own Downfall Essay
  • How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall Essay
  • How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall? Essay
  • How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Its Own Downfall? Essay Example
  • How Far Was Edward Iv Responsible for His Own Deposition in 1470? Essay
  • Was World War One Responsible for Nicholas Ii's Downfall? Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free