Preview

How effective is Parliament in fulfilling its functions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How effective is Parliament in fulfilling its functions
How effective is Parliament in fulfilling its functions? (25 marks)
The Parliamentary system within the UK is widely regarded as one of the best, most democratic and efficient systems of government within the world. With functions such as legitimacy, representation and scrutiny being carried out on a daily basis, Parliament is the most important and powerful part of the UK political system. However, the effectiveness of Parliament in fulfilling its functions has come in to question for a number of reasons, and many people feel that the UK’s Parliament is in fact no longer successful in properly fulfilling its functions. One function which Parliament can be viewed as effectively fulfilling is its representation. A major responsibility of Parliament is to represent each and every person within the country, and people within Parliament would certainly argue they are doing so. Each member of Parliament is there because they have been elected by the public to be there, and as a result they are representing the people within their constituency. This means that each person within society has a representative and someone who is echoing their views in front of the people who matter – those in Parliament. Furthermore, not only are the people being represented, but they are being represented by politicians who have expertise and are highly educated, meaning their representation is further improved. However, it can be argued that Parliament is in fact ineffective in fulfilling its function of representation. This is for a number of reasons. Firstly, the House of Lords, a major element of Parliament that has a huge say in decisions that are made, is made up of unelected citizens. This causes many people to ask how they are being represented, if the a major part of the Parliamentary system is purely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strength of the UK constitution is that there is sovereignty of Parliament. This is a strength as its elected body is accountable to the people. For example, MP’s are elected by the people whop stand in Parliament, which therefore means that the people in power have the general publics support to make decisions. But the nature of our constitution means that the location of sovereignty is a bit of a muddle.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the national representative body which has supreme legislative powers within its jurisdiction. While it oversees the completion of a number of other tasks parliaments’ main role is undoubtedly to make and pass laws and it has to be said that it achieves this role efficiently. Parliament and the members of parliament are elected solely by the people and are therefore responsible to the voting public. When passing laws parliament has the ability to, as part of its law making process obtain expert opinion with regards to tough and controversial issues. This process of law making is a completely structured procedure which follows a routine series of stages whenever a piece of legislation is proposed. These factors amongst others all contribute to the effective and efficient law making system that parliament is. While like any other structured organisation parliament has a number of weaknesses and faults these are minor and have very little effect on parliament as a law-making institution.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different ways that MPs hold the government to account; there are debates, select committees and questions, however there are many reasons in which these methods can be seen as ineffective. Accountability is forcing the government and it’s ministers to justify their policies, for opposition parties’ accountability may imply alternatives to the proposals of the government.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons has many functions including those of passing effective legislation, representing the views of the people they represent and holding the government to account to ensure that all decisions made are based purely upon the desire to benefit the public and to scrutinise all the actions of the executive.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another thing that parliament is the debate that takes place in parliament. The members of parliament can point out the advantaged of a particular change in the law, as well as flaws in any proposed change in the law.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government should represent the people. The government should be based on the people, there should be consent of the people: so called “virtual” representation. You do not need a vote so there is no democratic process involved. You do not need to be there and you do not need an official representative. You are nevertheless being represented by the government (royalty) and therefore obligated to obey and follow instructions. As long as the representatives of the nations agree everything is in order and “ok”, and that is the mix among the rule of one (the monarch), the few (aristocracy) and many (a merely representative parliament and the House of Commons). The house of common is constituted…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament can prove effective in right circumstances, but overall fails to be so. “Elected Dictatorship”. Standing Committees- assess and suggest amendments to bills (e.g. new Education Bill). Relevant minister for topic required to be present along with spokesperson for the opposition. Sounds effective, not so much so in practice. Heavily influenced by whips. Only pass amendments which come from the government. Not allowed to call outside witnesses so may not even understand what they’re voting on. If a case takes too long, it is ‘guillotined’, thrown out. Select Committees – assigned to scrutinise work of individual departments. Any members of committee prove troublesome to government they can be…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Members of Parliament (MPs) are chosen as representatives of constituencies all over Britain by the people. Whether these MPs represent each individual and his or her views fairly in the House of Commons, it is up to each individual to decide.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This house is largely made up of people promoted by the leader of the party in power. This means that the current prime minister can manipulate the political bias of the House of Lords. However because the House of lords is big at present any prime minister who tries to fill the house with his own political appointments faces a large amount of public criticism. Many people believe the House of Lords should be abolished because it is expensive and un-democratic. However, under our present First Past the Post System it can provide a useful check against bad legislation coming from a majority government in the Commons. For example David Cameron in October of 2015 threatened to suspend the House of Lords or flood it with Tory peers over tax credits. However, the House of Lords is not necessary under a representative system as legislation could only be passed if it has support across the political…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My interpretation of the question leads me to believe if parliamentary systems are better than presidential systems in deriving better political outcomes. By better political outcomes this implies not only ease of making political decisions but also the manner in which the two systems function and which is better, and whether or not this leads to favourable political outcomes. Issues that I am going to discuss in this essay are going to include the functionality of both systems, the differences between the two systems and whether or not the system provides and facilitates good political outcomes.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays