Part Two: An empirical/factual claim she states is about telling her friend that is deployed in the Middle East that it is safer there than in the United States. A policy claim she asserts is that the people from America should “bring the fight to them, full force” referring to the Middle East. An example of a value claim is when she mentions that yesterdays moderate is today’s terrorist. These claims harm her argument, because they aren’t necessarily true. She didn’t prove any of them with facts. They are based on induction because they have to do with her own observations, so they are just opinions. …show more content…
Another fallacy she uses is begging the question, she claims that someone needs to be a leader and fight back to solve this problem. These fallacies do work, because people get persuaded into doing what she says and agreeing with her. The red herring fallacy she used creates emotion, by letting the audience know about her many family members being marines. Begging the question creates inspiration, it persuades people into wanting to help