Preview

How Does Socrates An Unjust Form Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Socrates An Unjust Form Of Government
One of the most provocative claims that Plato makes through the voice of Socrates in The Republic is that a democracy is an unjust form of government. This view is illustrated in the quote above. This quote can be found in Book VIII in the passage in which Socrates describes how a democracy comes to be. He is claiming that, although a democracy gives voice to the voiceless, this is not a just form of government because some people should not be given a voice in government. In modern society, this claim would equate to the idea that people from low socio-economic backgrounds should not be allowed to vote because they don’t understand the political system or climate. Socrates’ claim must be elucidated, but first, Socrates’ definition of a democracy …show more content…
i) If the voice of the people determines justice, then a democratic society is just. C) A democracy is just.
I believe the citizens of a democracy demarcate justice. A just city must change and progress in with the desires of the people or else it will cease to function harmoniously and will no longer be just. The people comprise the city and are responsible for maintaining its inner peace, so they must be given a voice to create a just city. Socrates would disagree that justice can be defined by the people. Socrates believes that justice is innate. The people cannot determine justice; philosophers can only discover it. Socrates would argue: 1) Justice is unchanging. 2) If justice is unchanging, then it cannot be determined by society. C) Justice cannot be determined by society.
Socrates asserts that justice can be demarcated and set forth in the form of unchanging principles and unassailable values. Justice is not for uneducated citizens and lowly scientists to decide upon, for only the knowers of truth can conclude what the quality of being just incontrovertibly is. I disagree with Socrates’ first premise that justice is unchanging. Like the desires of the citizens, justice is subject to time and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Democracy provides the most just and efficient form of political rule” Asses whether Plato has shown his claim to be false.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One conversation between the parties was that of how a truly just state would look like and Socrates answers by declaring that a state might find justice when the overall happiness of the state has priority of desire to ones selfish ambitions. Socrates also says in reason people want to do what their desire bids them achieve and be trained in such a way that they would not care about anything but what their position in that society would have them do (The Republic, 376c-377e). This leads on to Socrates being asked to describe in detail how the laws of such a state would be where justice is to be found. Socrates says that for him to explain such a place to them would cause such humor to the group because his ideas are quite contrary to the ideas of people in the society in which they live(The Republic 450d-452e). He explains that three ideas that would push could be implemented that could make up a society that may contain justice. One is the common education of men and women another is women and children held in common the third is the idea that philosophers should rule as kings.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states that “An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself,” which in Socrates case is also true for the state is persecuting a small group of like-minded individuals. On the other hand, Socrates claims “…the majority could inflict the greatest evils, for they would then be capable of the greatest good… but they cannot do either,” which contradicts King’s stance of power/ structure of the majority. It can also be said that Socrates believes if one fails to argue their perspective on a matter they should stop fighting and accept their punishment/ fate while King upheld the ideal that if he fails in arguing the point to the opposing side then he should continue to debate the issue until it is recognized. In Kings interpretation/explanation of a nonviolent campaign he says that “direct action,” is necessary but Socrates does not hold this to be true since he believes he should not take action against the majority. After he utilizes the first three steps he neglects to make use of the forth and that is what makes their theories…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What did the Greeks mean by democracy? Their constitution is called a democracy because power was in the hands of not a minority but of a whole people. Everyone was believed to be equal in the eyes of the law. Political life is open and free, and so were the relations with one another. They were tolerant in their private lives however; in public affairs they would keep to the law. The Greeks had deep respect for everyone. They were obedient to those in authority. If they were to break the laws it was seen…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 507 B.C. an Athenian leader named Clisthenes introduced political reforms that introduced democracy. Democracy means “rule by the people,” and the citizens vote to decide the rules of their country. The Greeks, especially the Athenians who founded democracy, provided citizenship, public education, and most importantly, freedom of speech. In order for there to be democracy, the citizens must feel safe in expressing their views and in criticizing the government. Even though democracy disappeared from history after the fall of Athens until the 1700s in America, its concept still hasn’t changed from time and it became Greece’s most enduring contributions to the world.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates is asked to defend justice on its own, but not for the reputation that it brings, he suggests that justice should be found in the city before starting to use the analogy of finding it in an individual. He then uses an example of a just city that aims at satisfying the basic human wants. Some citizens enter into political welfare as no one is independent. Nevertheless,…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that world leaders do not exactly agree on what a democracy means. A democracy’s most salient and universally agreed upon component is a voting system. Athens was not truly democratic because they had slaves, no woman rights, and no equal rights.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This higher law can be the divine laws of reason. Socrates may be consistent in his approach to just and unjust law. A paradox may exist between the Athenian Law and the laws of reason. What Socrates could have been suggesting is that it would have been impossible for him not to philosophize and use his reason. In this way, to not be politically disobedient, he would have to change the very nature of his being. In essence, Socrates was not ‘disobeying’; rather he was incapable of ‘obeying’. An example would be if the Athenian State asked him to pass through the eye of a threading needle. In this instance, the task is impossible and by default Socrates would defy the state – not be cause won’t but because he can’t. It is important to note that in all instances leading up to the trial, that Socrates faced justice vs. unjust choices. The final ultimatum was an impossible instruction: actively terminate your ability to dialogue and reason. To obey the state, Socrates drank the hemlock. This was the only way to consistently obey the state and be…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of distinction and a man with strong ideas on how to make a more perfect society. Although a lot of his ideas conflict with his ability to be just or unjust it does not in his mind. Being just or unjust is a major topic in the book and there are many different ways of being both. Socrates used the terms, not necessarily the way we would normally use the term today, but parts of his depiction made sense. He said a lot of different things could be considered unjust. For example not doing what you were Destined to do or what you are best at is considered unjust in his mind.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He must do this regardless of the opinion of the majority or possible consequences for himself; he must act only in accordance to the opinion of the few wise, knowledgeable men who understand what is justice, and the laws of the State. Unfortunately, in all of the dialogues the author of this essay has read5, Socrates never clearly explains what ‘the laws’ really are — they remain a sort of abstraction, a divine essence of justice. However, this does not invalidate our definition of a champion of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our current political system is structured far from Socrates’ vision for an ideal state, and he would likely be appalled at the democratic system of government we currently enjoy. The United States holds free elections open to all members of society who meet the required criteria, eliminating the guarantee that those in power are truly devoted to the best interests of the communities they represent. In fact, modern politicians often rule with themselves or their respective parties in mind, compromising the community-minded leadership Socrates proposed in the…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Justice

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates makes use of the fact that each citizen in the ideal city is doing his or her own work and is therefore just. Now, if the citizen is just, then it follows each part of the person's soul and must also be doing its job and be just. This assertion, of course, rests on the assumption that justice applies to both the city and the soul and that the soul is divisible. Those who produce for the city can only be just if they produce as much goods as they can. As a result, producing goods for the good of society makes them “good’, therefore, serving a purpose in society. Citizens that are inherently unjust are those who don’t contribute to the good of society and bring the ideal city down. During the philosophers’ discussion, Socrates…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays