Preview

How Does Peaceful Resistance Affect Our Laws Positively Or Negatively

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Peaceful Resistance Affect Our Laws Positively Or Negatively
Does peaceful resistance affect our laws positively or negatively? In fact peaceful resistance has a positive impact on our laws. Just like publicity, non-violence is supposed to lower the bars of negative effects, impacting our laws. The relationship between the american public and laws enforcement has always, had a violent nature that as a country has never been able to escape. Yet, throughout the years the people of this country have used peaceful resistance to change so much of the mistakes, this country has made.

From Thomas Jefferson to Rosa Parks to Daniel Ellsberg. They all made changes, by committing acts that some americans would call criminal,but they acted out acts of civil disobedience. Some see civil disobedience as an unjustly demon in one,
…show more content…
While others say it could maraud civil society. Which continues to show that rebelling is okay to do against the law and order. Civil disobedience can be done in a respectful way, just like the days of segregation. Segregation traveled to the American South and became the law, until the American Civil Rights Movement came about. “You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right.” These words were said by Rosa Parks, who was seen as a civil rights activist. The words she spoke, were able to enlighten the role of how civil disobedience can be used positivity just like how Parks was able to do. For example an article called Rosa Parks and Civil Disobedience by Prerana Korpe say; “When the bus filled up and no seats remained, the driver ordered four African Americans, including Parks, to clear their seats so that a white man could sit down. All but Parks acquiesced.” This

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When answering the question does peaceful resistance to laws positively of negatively impact a free society, one word takes precedence - peaceful. Too many times we overlook that word and the result is just resistance to laws. In recent days, something that was titled peaceful demonstration turned into violent protest. The violence is often the intention of the "resistance" groups from the onset. The latest example comes from those who protested the outcome of the presidential election of Donald Trump. Their intention was violence and destruction in the name of protest. Egged on by media corporations with political leanings, these enraged individuals are given a free pass. This gives actual civil disobedience no chance to create positive change. The majority of protestors have no idea what cause they are associated with, just looking for their shot to get on television. The next "protest" must outdo the last and so on and so on. It is now commonplace to destroy property, set fires and attack innocent bystanders to get your point across.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” This quote by Thomas Jefferson shows that even though there are risks, stand up for what is right and just. The law is not always the right thing and people who disagree are considered, Civilly disobedient. Civil disobedience is standing up for what is right even if it’s the law. Two men who took a stand for their right is Martin Luther King Jr. and David Thoreau. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” is about MLK Jr.’s experience with civil disobedience. MLK Jr. himself, committed an act of civil disobedience and stood up for what was right. As did David Thoreau in “From Civil Disobedience”. These men knew the law and the consequences that would follow, but they understood what would benefit from their act of disobedience.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 913 Words
    • 1 Page

    change to occur; the act of civil disobedience can change anything from civil rights to equality,…

    • 913 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to law positively impacts society. Humans have a lengthy, detailed history of not always being able to see what is right or moral in certain circumstances, and unfortunately, humans are who create laws. One infamous example of unjust laws would be the Jim Crow laws of the south. Today, it is clear as day that discrimination and racism is unconstitutional, but why was it so hard to see that during that time period.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1968, close to 50 years ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. was killed by an assassin's bullet. He had given us a decade of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. While the idea of nonviolent protest was still relatively new, MLK hadn’t invented it; he had been one of a few who pioneered the idea and made it popular. The theory of civil disobedience can be traced back to an essay by Henry David Thoreau by the same name. This theory was adopted and popularized by Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi, and eventually, Martin Luther King, Jr.. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau said that if a law “requires you to be the agent of injustice to another,” you should break that law, rather than be unjust to another person.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it informs and educates the government on how Americans react to certain laws. This can be observed in many of the current events that are going on in America today and have gone on the past the past.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws does not only positively impact a free society, it is essential to a free society. In our great nation, it is our First Amendment Constitutional right through the exercise of assembly, speech, press, and petition. Civil disobedience in order to resist a law is perfectly justifiable, as long as the law is unjust. Morris Leibman's "Civil Disobedience: A Threat to Our Society" is accurate when is said that "There can be no law to which obedience is optional". This is correct, there needs to be compliance in order for safety for the general public, however peaceful resistance to a law, when no one is being hurt, and done within the law is perfectly acceptable. What is meant by this is peaceful resistance is peaceful assembly, lobbying…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, through the details I have mentioned earlier I believe that peaceful resistance to laws have a positive impact on a society. If you look back through history this has almost always been the case. On the other hand, if you look back on what violent resistance has accomplished it is basically…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It took years for rights to be expanded to others. One of the greatest examples of civil disobedience to allow for the expansion of civil rights is through Martin Luther King Jr.'s history of protesting segregation against black people. In my early education, I was aware of King's importance to civil rights but never understood what he had to go through in order to create a change. By being introduced to Letter from a Birmingham Jail in high school, I finally recognized that before he had a dream of equality King had to have the action of protest. Throughout his letter, he emphasizes the distinction between just and unjust laws. As King states, "An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law" (King, 1963). Americans must understand that civil disobedience should only be exemplified when there is a moral purpose behind the desire for…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One example is the lunch counter sit-ins in diners throughout the South during the Civil Rights movement. Through the use of these peaceful protests, African American citizens could emphasize the fact that racism was so ingrained into American society that they could not even have a cup of coffee due to their race. Another example is the Montgomery bus boycott. The incarceration of Rosa Parks after refusing to give up her seat for a white passenger sparked bans on riding segregated buses across Montgomery, bringing to center stage the anger felt by African Americans that they were always being pushed back to make room for the whites. These feelings would have gone unnoticed by the white majority if it weren’t for civil disobedience. Today, there are numerous examples of how civil disobedience has had major impacts in our society. The Women’s March on Washington was a peaceful protest against sexism that spread far beyond Washington, with protests taking place in major cities across the globe. The protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline helped to postpone construction and raise awareness for issues faced by Native Americans on reservations across the country. It is undeniable that civil disobedience has been an effective method of change throughout history and should continue to impact…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carl Cohen writes "Persons who engage in civil disobedience deliberately flout the law; They make light of it in a way the cannot be justified in a law governing community." I strongly disagree with this argument. Yes, one does "deliberately flout the law" when committing a civil disobedience act but it is a way to protest for ones believes. The government would not listen to its people with just a letter asking to change a law. They need to be informed with an act. Carl Cohen also writes "Civil disobedience Supposes the primacy of selfishness interests" and he argues that every act of civil disobedience is immoral and is against what society needs. He says that only certain people benefit the act of the certain civil disobedience. I do not agree with this statement because as mentioned before, Rosa Park, did not only help herself but the rest of the African Americans community. Alice Paul did not only help herself but the rest of the woman population who was not being…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past years we have experienced many peaceful resistance against a few laws. For example, Cesar Chavez decided to boycott the grape industry. Martin Luther King Jr. gave the "I Believe Speech" in front of many Americans. Those were great peaceful ways to make our country better. Many people may argue peaceful resistance may cause a negative impact on our free society, but I can strongly disagree with that. People who say it causes a negative impact is because they are scared of the truth.They feel if they ignore everything that is really going on it will be okay. No, peaceful resistance is not to make our country dangerous; on the contrary, it is to make our country stronger. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter when he was in jail, and…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance has a positive impact on a free society. The best way to get things accomplished is to make your voice heard and to fight against topics you feel are unjust. However, the main component to being successful is keeping it peaceful. Too many times, people protesting get violent and take it too far. With the recent election of Trump, there have been riots with people harming others, burning buildings, and smashing windows. This has done nothing but make a common political party turn against each other. It only brings negative attention to their cause. On the other hand, the recent Women's March on D.C., was a peaceful gathering of both men and women to raise awareness to women's causes. Although there were critics, the marchers…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays