How does acting out of self-interest drive the theory of determinism

Good Essays
Ethics HU4640

Determinism:
How does acting out of self-interest drive the theory of determinism well..., what is determinism it is defined as the ‘means universal causation? For everything that occurs there is a corresponding cause.” In philosophy it is known as “the doctrine that all events, including human decisions, are completely determined by previously existing causes.” One states that it is corresponding cause while the other states that it is previously an existing cause. So, how does acting out of Self-Interest drive the theory of determinism; that is to say determinism is claimed that our existence is ‘pre-determined’, the that free will is, but an illusion. Many who believes in a destiny-path or so form of supernatural (Religious-faith), will be hard to believe or even comprehended determinism.

Determinism, for those that are religious the decision they make them believe it’s be ordain by their decisions. But if you think about it, whatever ‘free-will’ choices we make that path has been destine to occur, if we chooses wrong, or right, or the alternative of right and wrong, or non-religious path what waits us, seem to be somewhat ordain by our discussion where it was ‘free-will’ of self-interest, or of religiously –“free will”. Determinism, seems to be like a line game they use to determine the path of result of one will do, well in terms of one of school.
This line game is of ‘free-will’ that we chose. This line chosen will take us too many directions but, in the end the result seems somewhat pre- destine to occur. This choice we made, was out of our (students ) ‘free-will’ or “religiously- free-will’, that led us to choose that line . That line has already seemed to be pre-destining what the result will be at the end of the line. It is a very common game, in my previous school, in Japan this is how we are fairly chosen-(freely) or, destine to do what states at the end of the line. This was basically done so, we knew what we were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Free Will vs. Determinism

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Society walks about day-by-day living their lives and never really thinking or breaking down how their day unfolds or why it plays out the way it does. Some people have said that individuals have a choice and are able to decide on where their day goes. Others on the other hand would argue this assessment and state that your day and your life as whole are all pre determined. The different is free will vs. determinism. Do you believe we live in a free will world or has everything been planed out and is determined to happen no matter what? To start out on finding an answer to this question we must first break down the two terms and a bit about their background and what they mean to us as an individual walking around day-to-day living our lives.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate between free will vs determinism is important because it reflects on actions and intentions of humans, but free will brings up strong valid points supported by evidence. Free will can be simplified as a human does what they ultimately and truly want in their mind, through their own beliefs and character. Determinism is about having strong influences in an environment, that the decisions of individuals reflect off their unconscious mind. Determinism can influence decisions, but the final decision and action is up to the individual. Through past experiences a person can learn and be influenced by everything in their surroundings, but it does not force a person to make a decision based on their past. I do not believe that anything is…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is it possible to act freely if all of our decisions were already predetermined? This interesting question is connected to the most discussed philosophical question. Every philosopher wants to know, “Do human beings ever act freely?” Incompatibilist and compatibilist have been going back and forth about it for years. Compatibilist believe that determinism and free will can both exist. In this paper, we will define determinism, free will, compatibilism, and incompatiblism. I will show how the incompatibilist are right. I am an incompatibilist because I believe determinism and free will cannot coexist since determinism eradicates free will and the purpose of life.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft Determinism

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Determinism currently takes two related forms: hard determinism and soft determinism [1][1]. Hard determinism claims that the human personality is subject to, and a product of, natural forces. All of our choices can be accounted for by reference to environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary (biological) causes. Our total character is a product of these environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary forces, thus our beliefs, desires, values and habits are all outside of our control. The hard determinist, therefore, claims that our choices are determined by these factors; free will is an illusion because the choices and decisions we make are derived from our character, which is completely out of our control in creating. An example might help illustrate this point. Consider a man who has just repeatedly stabbed another man outside of a bar; the other man is dead. The hard determinist would argue that there were factors outside of the killer's control which led him to this action. As a child, he was constantly beaten by his father and was the object of ridicule and contempt of his classmates. This trend of hard luck would continue all his life. Coupled with the fact that he has a gene that has been identified with male aggression, he could not control himself when he pulled the knife out and started stabbing the other man. All this aggression, and all this history were the determinate cause of his action.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussing a theory one must start with some data in order to prove the validity of the theory, and in discussing determinism this is no different. Two suitable criteria dealing with the decision making process are: firstly that we at times deliberate with the view of making a decision , and secondly regardless of whether I deliberate I sometimes have a personal choice in the decision making process. These criteria are ideal because they are both things that we as individuals are fairly certain of so any acceptable theory must account for them in some way. For common sense, a virtue in argumentation, suggests that it is easier to accept the veracity of partial self-determination in the decision making process than an abstract philosophical theory. To asses the applicability of the data to determinism a more in depth examination of determinism is needed, which Taylor defines as having three tenets: Firstly, that the theory of determinism is true. Secondly, that voluntary behaviour is free unless constrained, and finally that causes of voluntary behaviour are certain states, condition, decisions, and desires. The principle problem of determinism is precisely this last tenet, for what are the causes of the inner states that cause my actions? Where do they come…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism Vs Fatalism

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Determinism and Fatalism are beliefs or, in general, outlooks towards life, between which several variances can be acknowledged. Both of these philosophies hold the view that there is no such thing as a free will and that it is merely a deception. If we think that we are powerless and what is destined - or is our fate - will happen, regardless of we may do we hold an attitude that is referred to as fatalism. On the other hand, those who believe that there is a source of every result and that tomorrow is constructed on what we do today are determinists - or having belief in determinism. Fatalists belittle all human activities, saying that happenings in life are predetermined and whatever is going to happen will happen, regardless. Determinists…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about how Christians think about determinism and free will many people think Christians would side with determinism. However, in the article “Free will and Determinism as it Relates to Christian Apologetics” by Joel Furches explains Christians believe in…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Determinism is the belief that your future is fixed or determined, either by what you have genetically inherited or by your social environment and experience. The alternative to determinism is choice and interaction this is the belief that people can take control of their own lives through the choices they make. It is sometimes referred to as the ‘free will’ viewpoint.…

    • 3239 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week’s essay is a comparative analysis of the theories of freedom (indeterminism) and predestination (religious determinism). Our analysis will attempt to prove the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination. First, we will examine the theory of predestination as it is explained in the text “Ethics: Theory and Practice” (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012). The organization of the text lends itself to our analysis since it highlights differences between the two theories in its defining process. We will illustrate the theory of predestination by offering an example which will humanize the theory. Next, we will explore the theory of freedom through the lens of predestination. We will then exhibit the theory of freedom with an example. Finally, we will analyze and compare the two theories by demonstrating their applicability for today’s society and arguing the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Will is defined as the ability of agents to make choices unconstrained by certain factors. Libertarians believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible.. The determinist also follow the doctrine of incompatibility.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To consider the extent to whether free will is compatible with Determinism, you must first think about whether or not we actually possess free will in the first place. A Hard Determinist would say that individuals are not free to act upon anything as it is like a path set up by other natural factors in which we have no control over, this leads to the conclusion that humans are not morally responsible for any action. Any moral decisions we make have causes prior that are uncontrollable. Therefore a Hard Determinist would say that free will and Determinism are not compatible with one another. On the other hand is Libertarianism, with which free will is closely compatible. Philosophers such as Kant, believe that we are completely free meaning that we are morally responsible for every action we take. Between these two extremes stands soft-determinists, such as Hume. These think that most decisions we make are the result of external factors but also we have acted upon free will to make it happen. In fact, they go so far as to say that true freedom requires causation, without this there would be randomness. Therefore free will is completely incompatible with a hard determinist, but a Soft Determinist however would argue that free will must be compatible. So a libertarian approach seems like the most convincing as it implies that we are morally responsible for our actions but takes into account the fact that external factors may have caused this.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays