How Do You Think Fish's Idea That Students Should Not Express Their Opinion In Academic Writing

Fish’s idea that students should not express their opinion in academic writing is highly speculative. Fish claims that the students are not expected to show their opinion in academic writing because writing is all about influencing reader’s view. According to Fish, the purpose of writing is to “expand the possibilities of thought and action—that, not self-expression” (Fish). Therefore, writings should lecture new knowledge or perspective about certain topic to readers. Based on this quote, Fish shows that student’s opinion is not so important in academic writing. However, Fish’s belief seems to be somewhat mistaken because what students are expected in academic writing is not reproducing someone’s idea but expressing their opinion clearly.
As a matter of fact, Greene gives an example of a student writer of educational reform (30). After researching educational reform, the student come up with his own argument and disagrees with the idea that school is the most important educational institution (Greene 30). As this example suggests, in academic writing, summarizing someone’s idea will be less valuable. What are expected in college students is to express their opinion clearly to reader. Agreeing with Greene, Rose adds that students will experience problems if they do not state their opinion in academic writing. Mike Rose, another composition scholar and an author of “The Politics of Remediation” believes so because academic writing is the training place where college students improve their writing technique in order to clarify what they think in their mind to reader. Illustrating this point, Rose highlights a student, Marita, who accuse of plagiarism because she “found an entry on creativity and used some selections from [encyclopedia] that had to do with mathematicians and scientist” and submit her assignment which asked students to agree or disagree with discussion of creativity (Rose