Preview

How do individual differences (e.g., personality, value, perceptions, attitudes, motivation and performance) affect team dynamics?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How do individual differences (e.g., personality, value, perceptions, attitudes, motivation and performance) affect team dynamics?
ANALYTICAL ESSAY

How do individual differences (e.g., personality, value, perceptions, attitudes, motivation and performance) affect team dynamics?

The importance of groups and teams have become a major focus in the business world today. Organizations have started to realize that the evolution from an individual to a team management approach is a priority in present day. The reality is that much of an organization’s work is accomplished directly or indirectly through teams, which are used as means of growing effectiveness and efficiency. Any organization is constantly changing and evolving (Scarnati 2005). Naturally, group procedure and conflicts are influenced by the choice of team member selection and directly impact required results. Creating an effective team takes time and will determine the level of productivity.
In order for a group to be successful it is important that its members are able to meet and discuss their ideas. This is made a lot easier if members’ schedules are complementary, i.e. members are able to meet at mutually agreed times without too much trouble. Part of what makes group work worthwhile is members’ diversity. Ensuring a group has a number of different perspectives, values and ways of thinking will add to the wealth of ideas created for a task in most cases. However, when people arrive at work they bring with them their individual traits and personalities (Dalal, R. S,2005). Regardless of a person 's position or responsibilities in the workplace, personality plays a role in how a person approaches a team, completes a task and interacts with other members of that team.
Personality encompasses a person’s relatively stable feelings, thoughts, and behavioural patterns (Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J,2001). To work effectively in a team, it is helpful to understand the personalities of different employees. Having this knowledge is also useful for placing people into the most suitable jobs and



References: McShane, S.L.M, 2013. Organizational behavior. 5th ed. the university of western australia: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Individual behavioral components & team dynamics - Research Papers - Saswatbarpanda. 2014. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.studymode.com/essays/Individual-Behavioral-Components-Team-Dynamics-1596353.html Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: Ameta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257–266. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52–69; Dalal, R. S. (2005). Salgado, J. F. (2002). The big five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125; Zimmerman, R. D. (2008). Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. (4 ed.). Pearson.…

    • 2192 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psy 250

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Friedman,H.S. & Schustack, M.W. (2009, July 15). Personality: Classic theories and Modern Research, Fourth Edition: Retrieved from University of Phoenix: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/ebooklibrary2…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psy 250

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Friedman, H. S. & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Friedman, H. S., & Schuustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed.). : Pearson Education, Inc..…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Friedman, H. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chart of Theories

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychosocial Paper

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Cervone, D. & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explaining Phobias

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Cervon, D., & Pervin, L. (2010). Personality: Theory and Research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son, Inc.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Friedman, H.S. & Schustack, M.W. (2009) Personality: classic theories and modern research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Working in Teams

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the video, the members work in the same organization but at different departmental levels with different knowledge and skills. How these people interact and relate to one another is a key factor in determining how successful the team will be at achieving its mission The group is made up of cross functional team members where there is input from people with a mixture of gender, race, age and ethnicity. It can be difficult managing a group like this because there are individual differences amongst each member. People vary among the layers of diversity: 1) personality, which is unique to every individual, 2) internal dimensions which is race and age, 3) external dimensions which includes religion and marital status and 4) organizational dimensions such as job title(McGraw Hill, 2007) These factors are likely to influence interpersonal relationships and the ability to work with others. Working together is part of many organizations that believe that…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Friedman, H. S. & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    History and Theory

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The forming of a high-performance and cohesive team is a delicate process that when done properly can reap great results. According to the text Tools for Teams, “effective teams go through three basic phases: formation, development, and renewal.”(Thompson, Aranda &, Robbins, 2000, p. 56) Each phase can prevent great challenges for each individual member of the team. It is an even greater challenge when team members are very diverse due to different personality traits, and differences in skills and abilities, as well as values and attitudes. Adding extra burden is strain brought on by geographical differences. These very challenges can be used as assets, and help create a very successful team. Let us see how this can be done.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have varied personality types and strength/weakness patterns. Understanding these, and how to play to our collective strengths, is vital to our success as an organization. I can think about personality at the individual and organizational level. The unique collection of individual personality types combines to create our organizational personality profile. When managing a project, I can examine this overall profile by creating a visual representation of the personalities within my organization/team to help identify which team members to assign what roles (Yilmaz & O’Connor,…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays