Preview

How Did Ww1 Influence The Russian Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Ww1 Influence The Russian Revolution
The Influence of WWI on the Russian Revolution: A historiographical review
I. Topic Introduction and research questions

WWI developed during an era of unprecedented global conflict, political fractioning, and breakdown of diplomatic Balkan relationships that rapidly expanded globally. Russia was undergoing worsening stress of the existing class structure, political instability under the developing constitutional monarchy, and aggressive pressures by the intelligentsia to gain more control of the country. The Russian military was comprised predominantly of a peasant class that was overwhelmed with a poor sense of nationalism and feelings of abuse and disregard. With a collapsing class structure, continued political conflict among
…show more content…
History has demonstrated that Russia was a militarily weak nation with a poor sense of nationalism by its vast peasant class. The following research paper will discuss four areas of historiography. First, How did historians shortly following the time document and view the tactic of retreating from WWI and the influences that affected that decision? Specifically, did historians view this as protectionism, fear of annihilation by the Western powers, a Czar’s political strategy to stabilize while the world was in turmoil or was the political instability in Russia too overwhelming for the support of military for participation? Secondly, when did the western historians begin to challenge or debate the same influences? How did both of these groups elucidate the primary data, what lenses were used to view the data, and what were the influences on objectivity that each historian experienced? Thirdly, who were the communist party sanctioned historians and what publications and sources were available to be critiqued? Finally, What are the revisionist positions and did the communist historians change any historiography following the fall of communism? Throughout this research, the historiographical methods, lenses, and pressures on objectivity will be compared and contrasted among each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2: Russia become involved in WWI after Austria declared war against Serbia, because Russia had made itself the guardian of all Slavic and/or Eastern Orthodox peoples, particularly the south-slaves in the Balkans who has for centuries been under Muslim- Ottoman domination.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of a balanced interpretation of Trotsky within history varies throughout the differing aspects of his life and personality, however it can be considered that overall, it offers a balanced interpretation to a limited extent. His position as a Marxist offers a more unbalanced interpretation, as perspectives vary from stating that he was a practical Marxist idealist to perceiving him as a bloodthirsty terrorist. Similarly, interpretations of Trotsky appear unbalanced when considering his role as a propagandist through his oratorical skills and writing, which allowed for him to be viewed as a great Bolshevik figurehead, whilst Soviet Realism effectively eliminated his significance within history, and vilified him. Within his role as Commissar for War, however, offers a more balanced opinion as it is widely regarded both during his time and in more contemporary times that he was incredibly fit for the role, however there are still interpretations that vary from the romanticised notion of Trotsky as War Commissar. Therefore it can be considered that when considering different aspects of his life, the extent of a balanced interpretation varies, however that overall history offers a limited balanced interpretation of Trotsky, as within each segment of his life, there is no real mutual consensus, as differing contexts and agendas behind documenting history aim to colour Trotsky in different ways. Historiography allows for these differing opinions to be recognised as due to the different contexts and agendas behind historians for documenting Trotsky’s history, as history is a humanised process and thus flaws can be evident within the differing interpretations of Trotsky’s character.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To write her book Ivan’s War, Catherine Merridale had to face the challenges of moving past the collective memory surrounded Russia’s involvement in World War 2. Merridale navigates that remaining available sources in her search to find the truth of the Red Army. Using a variety of inventive research techniques, Catherine Merridale acquires the historic data the see need to weave these accounts of the war, into the few central characters in her book. Merridale focuses on constructing an image of the Red Army the truly shows Russia for what is was between 1939 and 1945. She does this while proving the importance of personal experiences to the retelling of history.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dziewanowski, M. K. (2003). Russia in the twentieth century (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1964 Russia was seen as a leading superpower which dominated Eastern Europe. However this is a vastly different image than the inherently backward country that Russia was deemed to be one hundred years earlier. The most crucial turning point in the modernisation of Russia was the abdication of the Tsar in 1917 and the rise of the Bolshevik party which followed. Political modernisation, and more importantly a strong central government, was pivotal in allowing other Russian sectors, such as industry and agriculture to modernise. The First World War itself was not the key turning point as individually it did not greatly modernise Russia, however it can be seen as the catalyst for the political modernisation which was vital for the modernisation of Russia.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914 Germany and Austria declared war on Russia and their allies Serbia. Despite the fact that in 1908 Tsar Nicholas II had put into action ‘The Grand Military Programme’, aiming to rearm his forces and get Russia ready for war, the plan was set to finish in 1917, not three years earlier. Nevertheless, Russia went into war with its head held high, with full support and enthusiasm from the Russian people. By 1916 however, this support for the war had changed dramatically, as the fighting at the front had lived up to nobody’s expectations. Russia was now occupied by the enemy, proving the weakness of the Russian’s defence and the strength of the enemy. On the front line one out of three men had a rifle, due to the lack of weapons and supplies the incomplete military programme had been able to offer. The number of casualties, missing in action and death toll was catastrophic: 4 million by the end of 1915. Evidently moral of the men fighting was almost at breaking point, it was clear Russia was losing a battle they did not even want to fight. Another affecting factor on the front line was the fact that most of the…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the role of the Bolsheviks for the decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Auty, Robert, and Dimitri Obolensky. 1976. "An Introduction to Russian History (Companion to Russian Studies;1)." Brisol, Great Britain : Cambridge University Press Ltd.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian 1940's

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Soviet Union in the twentieth century was a tumultuous time for Russians who wished to speak their minds and for those who wished to stretch communism to the corners of the globe. With a government consumed by annihilating its opponents and censorship, Soviet writers such as Nikolai Bukharin and Grigori Deborin were compelled to depict the glory of communism or face the harshest of consequences. In “Down With Factionalism!,” Bukharin justifies his slander of Leon Trotsky in the battle to succeed Vladimir Lenin for the leadership of Russia. In Deborin’s “The Second World War,” he explains how the Soviet Union’s allies, England and the United States, let them down and how the USSR, alone, should be credited with saving Europe from Nazi Germany. Bukharin and Deborin rationalize soviet tactics through denouncing a political opponent and condemning capitalistic allies.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first World War, better known as World War I or the Great War, began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his expecting wife, Sophie, in Sarajevo, Bosnia during an open top parade. Despite the trauma that the First World War resonated throughout the globe, it led to a number of developments and innovations in society such as the rights of women, the end of class system, various form of arts influenced by the war such as poetry, music and paintings. New inventions such as the wristwatch, zips, stainless steel and pilot communication. There are also the inventions of new weapons and arms of which, after having been modernized, have led to the revolutionary technology and weapons we now have in the twenty-first century, such as the tank, machine guns and the use of poisonous gas.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Bernstein, Laurie, and Robert Weinberg. Revolutionary Russia: A History In Documents. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abdication of the Tsar in 1917 is still talked about today; the reasons are still disputed to this day. There are three main views; the optimist view which states that Russia was on the right path but the First World War slipped Russia into revolution. This view is supported by A.Gerschenkron who says, “That in the absence of war, Russia could have continued in the road of progressive westernisation”. The second is the Marxist view which suggests that Russia was on the verge of revolution until war broke out. In addition, this view also comes with the idea that war was ultimately good for Russia as it unified the country under the Tsar, but also it suggests that as the war prolonged, Russia was heading down the revolutionary path yet again. The last view is called the Synthesis view which suggests Russia’s revolution was going happen no matter but the war was just a catalyst in this process. The view that I agree with is the synthesis view, the idea that revolution was coming but war sped up the process. The main reason I agree with this is because as oppression increases the people become radical and we already saw this in ‘1905 revolution’, there are also many examples of this happening in modern day history.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays