Preview

How Did Women Influence Political Events In Rome?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2167 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Women Influence Political Events In Rome?
What evidence is there for how women could influence political events in Rome?

The ideal Roman woman’s role was exemplified by Cornelia Scipionis Africana, the loyal wife and mother who manages the household. Cornelia is known as the seamless example of a picture perfect woman: “It is reported that as Cornelia, their mother, bore the loss of her two sons with a noble and undaunted spirit” 9. She was famous for her dignified behaviour after her sons were murdered. This is the ideal political mother.

The paradox of this, in the Roman Empire, you get women who get enormous power who have great control over the emperors like Nero. If the model for the ideal roman women applied, that is not what you would expect. Those women are dynamic and
…show more content…
These imperial women are powerful, scheming, erratic, dangerous women who are not technically in power, but heavily advise those who are. Messalina is an example of these women. She was an imperial Roman lady, a great nymphomaniac, who used sexual favours and blackmail to keep her senators loyal. ‘She bore him two children, but then lost interest in Claudius and took a number of lovers’ 7.Messalina, through these strategies, had created a new style of politics. Even though she will be remembered in history as the great nymphomaniac, she cannot be denied of the fact that she was a great influence, even on Claudius – her husband. The problem for her is the fact that she was not allowed into the court room. But Messalina could overcome this by listening to cases intra cubiculum, which literally means in the bedroom of the Emperor. This was also another way that she could influence Claudius. This was only available to her as she had gained the freedom from the Palace guards, and they helped her influence these political events such as the fall of her own stepfather, Silanus …show more content…
Her own son, Nero had her killed. “Agrippina in her eagerness to retain her influence went so far that more than once at midday, when Nero, even at that hour, was flushed with wine and feasting, she presented herself attractively attired to her half intoxicated son and offered him her person” The relationship between Agrippina and her son was border-line incest. According to Suetonius, Nero had tried to kill his mother numerous times: three times were by poison, one was by having a collapsible ceiling above her bed and he had a collapsible boat built. The boat did sink. But Agrippina survived and swam ashore. Infuriated, Nero sent an assassin who bludgeoned and stabbed her to death.

When news was out that Nero had murdered Agrippina, Nero defended himself to the senate, reporting that his mother was plotting to kill him, meaning he had to retaliate first. Shockingly, the senate seemed unaffected by Agrippina’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first successful achievement for Agrippina was her marriage to the Emperor Claudius. In AD 39, Agrippina was exiled because she was accused of aligning with others in order to overthrow her brother, Gaius Caesar. However, in AD 41, Gaius was assassinated and Claudius became Princeps. Agrippina was recalled back to Rome and was considered to be a candidate for Claudius’ fourth marriage, after his marriage to Messalina had failed. Agrippina, had the advantage of a niece, and used it to make sexual advances upon Claudius. Her alliance with Marcus Antonius Pallas proved to be a significant factor in Agrippina’s marriage to Claudius. Pallas proposed her marriage to Claudius would strongly link both families (Julian and Claudian) and reminded Claudius that her son Nero was the grandson of Germanicus, a popular Roman commander. It was Pallas who convinced the Senate to revoke their rules on incestuous marriages, for one exception. In AD 49, Agrippina married Claudius. This gave her the tremendous power she needed in order to complete her ultimate ambition.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julia Agrippina or known better as Agrippina Minor or most famously Agrippina the younger was one of the most powerful and inferential women in the entire roman empire. Her power and her influence was one of her most remarketing features and it is also those features which become her demise and the main cause of her murder.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agrippina the Younger’s three marriages were significant in her rise to prominence as they all served her political advancement; protection from enemies, fortune and eventually, power in politics. Her first marriage was to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus, a man seventeen years her senior, described as a “wholly despicable character” (Suetonius). Her second marriage was to Gaius Sallustius Passienus Crispus, cut short by his death, but gaining her immense fortune. Her third and final marriage was to her uncle, Emperor Claudius, giving her the political power she craved, just as her mother did before her.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman women had a lot more freedom than other women. They were still considered subservient to men but compared to other countries had quite the amount of freedom. Daughters remained under their pater familias for life. However they were given a dowry, education, and training. In the first century a law was passed that allowed them to be free from a male guardian as long has she had given birth to three children. The role of woman then deteriorated in the middle ages during the classical…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout Plautus’ writings it is very evident that women in the Roman society were to stay home cook, clean, manage the household they did not carry the same value as the men of the household. It is in the play Pot of Gold where Eunomia one of the main girl characters clearly states this while in conversation with her brother she says on line 122 “Although I’m a woman and really don’t matter, (For men think that women just prattle and…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the seemingly incongruity of their marriage, Ahenobarbus still provided Agrippina with the means to expand her power further, in the form of her son, Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (born 37CE), later to become the Emperor Nero. Having a son was key to establishing Agrippina as a genuine force in Roman politics. A son could be manipulated and indoctrinated to suit Agrippina’s needs, and by virtue of her illustrious family tree, her son was assured to…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources from ancient historians tend to be more hostile towards Agrippina because she was a woman and she stepped outside the expected role of a Roman matron. In contrast to this, modern historians consider the context of her time and approach her with a neutral attitude. However, most of the historians present her according to three main stereotypes- the seducer and murderer of Claudius, the scheming and dominating mother figure or the imperial woman who goes beyond her matronly and aristocratic role.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Such an action was a reflection of the perseverance and determination to cease power, not plainly for herself, but for her son, which was not a common action displayed by many Roman women at the time. This further emphasises how important, influential…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agrippina Influence

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Her father, Germanicus had the favouring of Augustus and was a highly respected Roman soldier “Germanicus is everywhere described as having been of outstanding physical and moral excellence” (Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, Gaius, 3). He had the skill of winning over people’s respect and this was passed on to Agrippina. Having a father with such high ranks his legion of the Roman army acted as a huge power for Agrippina even at the young age of four as it offered protection and after her fathers death in 19AD, Agrippina had the loyalties of the army behind her.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plutarch’s classic literatures, Plutarch gives us his view of women and the roles they played back in his time. He illustrates how caring and encouraging, how determined, powerful and manipulative women can be. But this is only relative to the roles that women play in their personal and social life. The first example of how Cornelia is illustrated as a caring mother, the read says she take “upon herself all the care of the household and the education of her children.” Also, Plutarch illustrates how women are encouraging is in “Life of Tiberius Gracchus”, there is one scene where the Roman citizens suggests that Tiberius’ mother, Cornelia, encouraged him to fulfill his civic duty. First of all, Cornelia’s role is to be Tiberius’ mother so we can only assume that she said this out of being a mother. I think what Plutarch is trying to imply is that women who were mothers supported their children dearly. Next, my example of how a Plutarch illustrates women being determined to get what they want is in Plutarch’s “Life of Marcus Brutus” and “Life of Antony”. In “Life of Marcus Brutus”, when Brutus’ wife Porcia asks what Brutus is up to, he does not tell her because of the importance of secrecy. Porcia then to gain Brutus’ trust, maimed herself to prove that Brutus could trust her. In this example here, Plutarch exemplifies the willingness and determination of women in love/ wife. He shows how women are attached to their husbands and how women can be strong to stand up for themselves. Also, towards the end of the story, when Porcia learns of Brutus’ death, she takes her own life by eating live coals. I think what Plutarch is trying to say is that women take their husbands very seriously and when a couple is married, maybe marriage links their lives together and deaths. In my third example, Plutarch shows how powerful and manipulative a woman can be. My example lies in the story “Life of Antony”, Cleopatra; the queen of Egypt manipulates Antony to fight war…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    women, at the time, to be able to keep Rome’s population intact. To solve this dilemma,…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Kazhdan and Epstein, “the crystallization of the nuclear family that had taken place by the ninth century drastically changed the social role of women.” That means women began to be more active in governing issues in the Empire. “The empresses Eirene and Theodora” began to influence on governing the states. “The traditional family structure seems to have modified in the late eleventh and twelfth centuries,” although family was very important for the Empire. The change in nuclear family in the Byzantine Empire may have affected on the Empire’s decline, too, because “reflecting this loosing of traditional internal family structures was the again-increased prominence of women.” This kind of issues on traditional family may have made imperial women think and act selfishly, such as Eirene and Theodora. “A comparison of late-eleventh-and twelfth-century aristocratic ladies with their predecessors manifests the trend in Comnenian society, for example empress Zoe was historically a significant one.” “With the shift in the structure of society toward the extended family, lineage became increasingly important in determining an individual’s status and power, and the use of patronymics was an external sign of this new concern.” So, those kinds of changes and disintegrations negatively influenced on the Empire, blocked its progress because individuals began to think of their benefits, and also a concept of nepotism emerged just after the 11th century in the Empire because of the extended family situation. Nepotism is an unfair concept, so this may negatively have influenced on the Empire, too. Overall, Kazhdan and Epstein investigated the issues in the Byzantine…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agrippina the younger is recognized as one of the most ambitious women in history who encompasses a great desire for power, wealth and supremacy. The Julio Claudian period was solely a patriarchal society, but this didn’t mean women could not hold any influence. It is in this period we see ambitious women such as Agrippina attaining power through men. Agrippina chose specific individuals with influential talents; she formed political allies with them in the positions of power that would ultimately pave the way to her own desires and ambitions centered mostly around the promotion of Nero, and what Tacitus describes as “a vigorous, almost masculine despotism.”…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Veerginia Women's Rights

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In recent history, a focal point of attention has been placed on the issue of Women's Rights and an increased role for women in society. One would think that the spirit of most of these sweeping social reforms can be traced back to ideas in Ancient Rome, but after reading Roman literature, I have come to realize that the role of women in ancient roman life was an incredibly small one. It seems that in ancient Rome, women were seen as equal, but were anything but in practice. In the stories of Lucretia and Verginia, both women aren't really a key part of the story, but rather just a problem or inciting incident of the story. One could see this to an extreme degree in the story of Verginia, where in the text Verginia says next to nothing the…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years there have been different interpretations of whether Agrippina killed Claudius. Although it is difficult to find the truth in a crime committed so many years ago, through the investigation of ancient and modern sources we are able to gather evidence of whether Agrippina did kill Claudius or if he died from a natural cause. Sources like Tacitus and Dio Cassicus claim that Agrippina killed Claudius for her own reasons, while other sources like Seneca (more of a contemporary writer) claims nothing about poison. Based on the evidence it’s possible that Agrippina did kill Claudius. Claudius was a Roman emperor from 41-45 B.C. member of the Julio-Claudius family, who later in life married his niece Agrippina. According to Suetonius, Agrippina persuaded Claudius into marrying her through dishonesty. Ancient historians suggest that in the months leading to Claudius’s death, Agrippina and Claudius had become more aggressive and Claudius was expressing to Agrippina that he wanted to see his son Britannicus approach manhood for Britannicus was the next in line to reign. Agrippina was not pleased with Claudius’ plan because she had motives to ensure the succession of her own son Nero, who was older than Britannicus (C. Suetonius Tranquillius 43).…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays