After they were faced with the prospect of Georgia taking their land, the Cherokee took the matter to the Supreme Court. “The Court’s rulings in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia supported the tribe’s contention that the state had no authority to negotiate with tribal representatives” (Brinkley 208). Their victory was short lived when “the Removal Act of 1830 was ratified by Congress and signed into law by President Andrew Jackson” (History & Culture). The Cherokee’s attempts to postpone the relocation were made in vain. In 1835, “Jackson had lost his patience,” and offered them $5 million dollars and the promise permanent residence on the new land without interference, but they were given two years to leave (Maddox 108). After John Ross, the principal chief of the Cherokee, signed the Treaty of New Echota, the Cherokee were then uprooted from their homes and forced to relocate to less hospitable lands in “Indian Territory,” which is known as Oklahoma
After they were faced with the prospect of Georgia taking their land, the Cherokee took the matter to the Supreme Court. “The Court’s rulings in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia supported the tribe’s contention that the state had no authority to negotiate with tribal representatives” (Brinkley 208). Their victory was short lived when “the Removal Act of 1830 was ratified by Congress and signed into law by President Andrew Jackson” (History & Culture). The Cherokee’s attempts to postpone the relocation were made in vain. In 1835, “Jackson had lost his patience,” and offered them $5 million dollars and the promise permanent residence on the new land without interference, but they were given two years to leave (Maddox 108). After John Ross, the principal chief of the Cherokee, signed the Treaty of New Echota, the Cherokee were then uprooted from their homes and forced to relocate to less hospitable lands in “Indian Territory,” which is known as Oklahoma