Preview

How Did The Wilmot Proviso Lead To The Civil War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Wilmot Proviso Lead To The Civil War
The Wilmot Proviso, and the question of whether to allow the expansion of slavery, gave the nation’s political parties a new focus, and inspired the establishment of new political factions. In the election of 1848, the Democrats and the Whigs were both split over the issue of expanding slavery. Factions in support of the Wilmot Proviso clustered together, and formed the Free Soil Party. Northerners had become increasingly suspicious of the Union, and believed that the Federal Government was run by an aggressive slave power—proslavery congressmen. The Free Soil Party pledged to resist such congressmen, and their suspected will to spread slavery into the west. With the introduction of the Free Soil Party, the Whigs and the Democrats were …show more content…
The Whigs won the election; however, the Free Soil Party, and their anti-slavery values, caught the eye of America to a degree that no social or economic factor had. Again, westward expansion would set the scene for political upheaval, when California’s statehood threatened the balance of power. The argument exposed the intensifying resentment between the North and South, and publically portrayed the speed at which the nation was moving toward a civil war. A great pacifist known as Henry Clay offered a compromise that, like the Missouri compromise, would solve short term issues but change the views of citizens toward the Union in a detrimental manner. Clay’s compromise of 1850 marked the first of many political advancements of the decade. Briefly, the compromise stated that California would be admitted, by congress, as a free state, but Congress would then protect slavery, by passing Fugitive Slave Laws—laws that slaves, who escaped to the North, must be given back, and northern citizens had an obligation to do so—and the territories of Utah and New Mexico solve the issue of slavery by popular …show more content…
The Compromise of 1850, as well as, the policies that extended from it, caused political upheaval, which would soon spark the Civil War. The first political change was the disintegration of the Whig party. Next, was the formation of a weak political party, known as the Know-Nothings. The Most important political change, of the decade, was the introduction of the Republican Party. The opposition of slavery was central to the Republican Party. The election of 1856 was won by the Democrats, who favored a less strong central government, and were overall divided on the issue of slavery. The Republican Party, however, won one third of the popular vote, and 11 of the northern states, marking their arrival as a powerhouse in Congress. The Republican Party would soon take a giant step towards popular vote when the Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott, a slave suing for his freedom, as he was being held as a slave, within the free state of Illinois. Essentially, the ruling stated that slaves could exist anywhere within the Union, and that, effectively, there was no such thing as a free state. This alarmed the northern states. The Republican Party and their endeavor to end slavery became widely supported in the North. Two great political figures emerged, by the close of the decade, Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas. Both become famous through their debates with each other, and so did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were also personal disputes in the time period. Arguments led into admitting California as a free state. Southerners did not agree with this opportunity and wanted California as a Southern Slave State. Other arguments between the North and South were the formations of governments in the South without limitations on slavery, giving orders to Texas to withdraw the land claims in New Mexico, evening out Texas by having the federal government to strike the state’s debts, allowing slavery to last in Washington D.C., banning slave trade in Washington D.C., passing a more successful fugitive slave law, and limiting Congress from sliding into the interstate slave…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Whigs split totally in 1852--- The Northern faction supported Winfield Scott, the Southern faction supported Millard Fillmore as a compromise candidate. There was a deadlock after 52 ballots- 96% of Scott’s votes were from free states and 85% of Fillmore’s from slave states. On the 53rd ballot Scott won the nomination.…

    • 3820 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The political view on slavery and states rights grew as compromise between the north and south political parties began to collapse during the mid 19th century. Henry Clay stated that it is impossible for South Carolina to become an independent state. (Doc A) A report of the American Anti-Slavery Society was opposed to slavery naming slave owners as "man stealers" and believed that slaves should be free. (Doc B) Political compromise was not greatly effected by their belief but the Compromise of 1850 resulted in the Fugitive Slave Law being passed which caused the collapse in the political parties.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism (1840-1861)

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the end of the Mexican War during Polk’s term as president, many new lands west of Texas were yielded to the United States, and the debate over the westward expansion of slavery was rekindled. Southern politicians and slave owners demanded that slavery be allowed in the West because they feared that a closed door would spell doom for their economy and way of life. Whig Northerners, however, believed that slavery should be banned from the new territories. Pennsylvanian congressman David Wilmot proposed such a ban in 1846, even before the conclusion of the war. Southerners were outraged over this Wilmot Proviso and blocked it before it could reach the Senate. When this act was denied it essentially caused America to become a country of two halves. Sadly, this division caused Americans to provoke wickedness against one another: the North vs. South, Slavery vs. Freedom, and Brother vs. Brother.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us History 1 Study Guide

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free –soil party = A political formed in 1848 to oppose the extension of slavery into U.S. territories.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disputes of 1820-1860s

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political leaders made it less likely to settle disputes. Leaders such as President Lincoln were anti-slavery and fought to abolish it. Political leaders would argue over southern succession such as Representative Preston Brooks and Senator Charles Sumner (Doc E). Many state representatives decided to succeed from the Union and many were thinking about it. Abraham Lincoln argued that the disputes on slavery weren't just about politics (Doc G). Lincoln won the election of 1860 because the Democratic Party split. He won all of the Free states votes beside New Jersey (Doc H). Politics made the chances of compromise even worst.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. finally claimed more land after the Mexican War, the Southern and Northern States slowly began to move farther apart. Even though Northern congressmen supported the Wilmot Proviso, which banned slavery in all new Western territories, the Southern congressmen completely disagreed and went against it. The Compromise of 1850 was set to hopefully smooth these disputes over by supporting the idea of popular sovereignty, western lands having the right to determine by themselves whether they would be free or slave states. The Free-Soil Party also had a big impact. They opposed slavery’s expansion in the Western territories in the late 1840s and early 1850s.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only because

    • 1016 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Free Soil Party emerged from antislavery men on the North who didn’t trust Cass or Taylor. (supported internal improvements) They argued that with slavery wage labor would wither away and with it, the chance for the American worker to own property…

    • 1016 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1860s election,the topic of slavery brought many political tensions to the Republicans and Democrats.The Republicans was an anti-slavery party.The Republicans disagree of the spreading of slavery and would take this issue to Congress,whenever they can,to stop its expansion.They viewed slavery as an a problem that would last forever,and thought the problem would soon lead to extinction (http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Background/BackgroundElection.html). As for the Democrats,they were pro-slavery party.They viewed slavery was good not only for the slave holder,but also for the slave(John C. Calhoun).In the 1850s Abraham Lincoln said that slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” but later on in his first Inaugural Address he said that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”Abraham Lincoln personally didn't like slavery but as a Republican he wished to abolish it.But as the President of America,he made a promise to the Constitution,which protected slavery (http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation). Therefore the tension that rose from slavery resulted in constant fighting of the Republicans and Democrats.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slave Compromise

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1820-1860, several reasons in the political views on slavery eventually led to the termination of compromise. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, generated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 in order to maintain the country as a whole. The Missouri Compromise declared Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, ended slave trade in Washington D.C. and a stronger Fugitive Slave Law passed. In 1833, Senator Henry Clay stated,”…it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state. Additionally, although Declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention in 1834 opposed slavery, they did believe Congress had “no right to interfere with any of the slave states…” .However, the northern disagreement against the Compromise of 1850, especially the Fugitive Slave Law, Wilmot Proviso and popular sovereignty, increased slavery’s opposition. This was emphasized in the Election of 1860, where not one Southern state voted for Lincoln; Lincoln won all of the “free” states except New Jersey. This major issue over slavery ultimately led to southern succession therefore deterioration of compromise. This is similar all of the times when individual states attempted to secede from the Union for various reasons, such as states’ rights. Western Expansion in Polk’s presidency due to Manifest Destiny created problems if new territories should be slave or free states. Like always, the North opposed slave states in new territories, and South favored it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, after seizing Mexico and the spreading of territories westward the South depended highly on slavery because of the "cotton king". One of these territories included the Kansas-Nebraska where many newcomers and the proslavery settlers began to move into the territory. In this territory after the 1852 election, the temporary peace of the Compromise of 1850 came to an end. Senator Stephen Douglas passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act which created two new territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The status of slavery in the area was decided to be by popular sovereignty. This act wrecked two compromises The Compromise of 1820, and 1850, and the democratic party. While the act formed a new party: the Republicans.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Presidential Election of 1860 was one of the most significant and influential events in American history. The election of 1860 was actually the 19th presidential election in the United States of America, held on November 6, 1860. It was a year after John Brown’s confident revolt at Harper’s Ferry which started the national debate of slavery. Everything was reaching to its boiling wait, decisions had to be made. The election soon became a national crisis because the central issue surrounded on the topic of slavery. Prior to the election even coming to place, two groups had formed surrounding the expansion of slavery and also the rights of slave owners. Eventually by the election of 1860, the Democratic Party formed into two different fractions surrounding these two issues. In the end, these two groups had formed the Constitutional Union Party.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays